ABSTRACT
Stored biological materials should have minimal pre-analytical variations in order to provide researchers with high-quality samples that will give reliable and reproducible results, yet methods of storage should be easy to implement, with minimal cost and health hazard. Frozen tissue samples are a valuable biological resource. Here we compare different methods, such as liquid nitrogen (LN) or dry ice (DI), to a cheap and safe alternative using an aluminum platform (AP). Murine fresh liver and pancreas tissues were used with varying lengths of warm ischemia time. Quality assessment was based on histological evaluation, DNA and RNA extraction and quantification, and RNA degradation analysis, as well preservation of antigens for immunofluorescence, in a blinded manner. Both in superficial and deep tissue sections, based on histological assessment, AP is superior to DI, or as good as LN techniques in terms of presence of ice crystals, cutting artifacts, and overall quality/structural preservation. DNA and RNA were successfully extracted in reasonable quantities from all freezing techniques, but RNA degradation was seen for pancreas samples across all techniques. Immunofluorescence with cytokeratin8 (CK-8), alpha smooth muscle actin (αSMA), CD3, and B220 shows equally good outcomes for AP and LN, which are better than DI. The aluminum platform is a cheap, yet reliable method to freeze samples, rapidly preserving histological, antigenic, and DNA/RNA quality. Wider testing is required across different sample types. © 2020 The Authors. Basic Protocol: Flash-freezing fresh tissue with aluminum platform Alternate Protocol 1: Freezing fresh tissue with liquid nitrogen Alternate Protocol 2: Freezing fresh tissue with dry ice.
ABSTRACT
Recently, stromal targeting, by agents such as All trans retinoic acid (ATRA), has been regarded as a promising avenue for the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The intra-cellular transportation of ATRA to the nuclear receptors is performed by either: fatty acid binding protein 5 (FABP5) or cellular retinoic acid binding protein 2 (CRABP2), dictating the transcription of downstream genes and, thus, eventual cell phenotype. Here, we explored the levels of each protein, in pancreatic tissues of patients presenting with a range of pancreatic diseases (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), chronic pancreatitis (CP), cholangiocarcinoma (CC)). We demonstrate that there is a significantly lower CRABP2 and FABP5 expression in activated fibroblasts or pancreatic stellate cells (PSC) in PDAC, as well as other diseased pancreas as in CC and CP, versus quiescent fibroblasts. The quiescent fibroblasts consistently show a pattern of high FABP5:CRABP2 ratio, whereas PSC in all non-PDAC tissues showed a low FABP5:CRABP2 ratio. PSC in PDAC patients had a range of FABP5:CRABP2 ratios (high, even and low). There was a lower CRABP2 expression in cancerous epithelial cells (PDAC) versus normal epithelial cells. This is also present in other disease states (CP, CC). Contrasting to the patterns seen for fibroblasts, the FABP5 expression in PDAC epithelial cells matched that of the normal epithelial cells. However, the normal epithelial cells had a high FABP5:CRABP2 ratio, compared to the PDAC epithelial cells. These ratios may have correlation with tumor progression, and overall survival. These findings could be confirmed in in vitro cell lysates. CRABP2 and FABP5 levels and ratios could serve as valuable biomarkers.
