Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 22(4): 338-47, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26672401

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Americans spend more than 90% of their time indoors, so it is important that homes are healthy environments. Yet many homes contribute to preventable illnesses via poor air quality, pests, safety hazards, and others. Efforts have been made to promote healthy housing through code changes, but results have been mixed. In support of such efforts, we analyzed International Code Council's (ICC) building code change process to uncover patterns of content and context that may contribute to successful adoptions of model codes. OBJECTIVE: Discover patterns of facilitators and barriers to code amendments proposals. DESIGN: Mixed methods study of ICC records of past code change proposals. N = 2660. SETTING: N/A. PARTICIPANTS: N/A. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): There were 4 possible outcomes for each code proposal studied: accepted as submitted, accepted as modified, accepted as modified by public comment, and denied. RESULTS: We found numerous correlates for final adoption of model codes proposed to the ICC. The number of proponents listed on a proposal was inversely correlated with success. Organizations that submitted more than 15 proposals had a higher chance of success than those that submitted fewer than 15. Proposals submitted by federal agencies correlated with a higher chance of success. Public comments in favor of a proposal correlated with an increased chance of success, while negative public comment had an even stronger negative correlation. CONCLUSIONS: To increase the chance of success, public health officials should submit their code changes through internal ICC committees or a federal agency, limit the number of cosponsors of the proposal, work with (or become) an active proposal submitter, and encourage public comment in favor of passage through their broader coalition.


Subject(s)
Housing/standards , Internationality , Safety/standards , Air Pollution, Indoor/statistics & numerical data , Housing/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Logistic Models , Pest Control/standards , Pest Control/statistics & numerical data , Safety/statistics & numerical data , United States
2.
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci ; 5(3): 170-8, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26557487

ABSTRACT

Central venous access is a common procedure performed in many clinical settings for a variety of indications. Central lines are not without risk, and there are a multitude of complications that are associated with their placement. Complications can present in an immediate or delayed fashion and vary based on type of central venous access. Significant morbidity and mortality can result from complications related to central venous access. These complications can cause a significant healthcare burden in cost, hospital days, and patient quality of life. Advances in imaging, access technique, and medical devices have reduced and altered the types of complications encountered in clinical practice; but most complications still center around vascular injury, infection, and misplacement. Recognition and management of central line complications is important when caring for patients with vascular access, but prevention is the ultimate goal. This article discusses common and rare complications associated with central venous access, as well as techniques to recognize, manage, and prevent complications.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...