A Comparison of Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scores among Individuals with Normal Hearing and Cochlear Implants.

OBJECTIVES: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a cognitive screening tool that has 4 of 10 test items heavily dependent on auditory input, potentially leaving hearing-impaired (HI) individuals at a disadvantage. Previous work found that HI individuals scored lower than normal-hearing (NH) individuals on the MoCA, potentially attributed to the degraded auditory signals negatively impacting the ability to commit auditory information to memory. However, there is no research comparing how cochlear implant (CI) recipients perform on the MoCA relative to NH and HI individuals. This study aimed to (1) examine the effect of implementing three different hearing-adjusted scoring methods for a group of age-matched CI recipients and NH individuals, (2) determine if there is a difference between the two groups in overall scores and hearing-adjusted scores, and (3) compare scores across our CI and NH data to the published HI data for all scoring methods. We hypothesized that (1) scores for CI recipients would improve with implementation of the hearing-adjusted scoring methods over the original method, (2) CI recipients would score lower than NH participants for both original and adjusted scoring methods, and (3) the difference in scores between NH and CI listeners for both adjusted and unadjusted scores would be greater than that reported in the literature between NH and HI individuals due to the greater severity of hearing loss and relatively poor spectral resolution of CIs. DESIGN: A total of 94 adults with CIs and 105 adults with NH were initially enrolled. After age-matching the two groups and excluding those who self-identified as NH but failed a hearing screening, a total of 75 CI participants (mean age 61.2 y) and 74 NH participants (mean age 58.8 y) were administered the MoCA. Scores were compared between the NH and CI groups, as well as to published HI data, using the original MoCA scoring method and three alternative scoring methods that excluded various auditory-dependent test items. RESULTS: MoCA scores improved for all groups when two of the three alternative scoring methods were used, with no significant interaction between scoring method and group. Scores for CI recipients were significantly poorer than those for age-matched NH participants for all scoring methods. CI recipients scored better than the published data for HI individuals; however, the HI group was not age matched to the CI and NH groups. CONCLUSIONS: MoCA scores are only partly affected by the potentially greater cognitive processing required to interpret degraded auditory signals. Even with the removal of the auditory-dependent items, CI recipients still did not perform as well as the age-matched NH group. Importantly, removing auditory-dependent items significantly and fundamentally alters the test, thereby reducing its sensitivity. This has important limitations for administration and interpretation of the MoCA for people with hearing loss.

The Effects of Substance Misuse on Auditory and Vestibular Function: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Chronic substance misuse is an ongoing and significant public health concern. Among a myriad of health complications that can occur, substance misuse potentially causes ototoxic effects. Case reports, retrospective chart data, and a few cohort studies suggest that certain prescription opioids and illicit drugs can have either temporary or permanent effects on auditory and/or vestibular function. Given the steady rise of people with a substance-use disorder (SUD), it is of growing importance that audiologists and otolaryngologists have an insight into the potential ototoxic effects of substance misuse. OBJECTIVES: A systematic review was conducted to (1) synthesize the literature on the illicit drugs, prescription opioids, and alcohol misuse on the auditory and vestibular systems, (2) highlight common hearing and vestibular impairments for each substance class, and (3) discuss the limitations of the literature, the potential mechanisms, and clinical implications for clinicians who may encounter patients with hearing or vestibular loss related to substance misuse, and describe opportunities for further study. DESIGN: Systematic searches were performed via PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, and the final updated search was conducted through March 30, 2022. Inclusion criteria included peer-reviewed articles, regardless of study design, from inception until the present that included adults with chronic substance misuse and hearing and/or vestibular complaints. Articles that focused on the acute effects of substances in healthy people, ototoxicity from already known ototoxic medications, the relationship between hearing loss and development of a SUD, articles not available in English, animal work, and duplicates were excluded. Information on the population (adults), outcomes (hearing and/or vestibular data results), and study design (e.g., case report, cohort) were extracted. A meta-analysis could not be performed because more than 60% of the studies were single-case reports or small cohort. RESULTS: The full text of 67 studies that met the eligibility criteria were selected for the review. Overall, 21 studies reported associations between HL/VL related to illicit drug misuse, 28 studies reported HL/VL from prescription opioids, and 20 studies reported HL/VL related to chronic alcohol misuse (2 studies spanned more than one category). Synthesis of the findings suggested that the misuse and/or overdose of amphetamines and cocaine was associated with sudden, bilateral, and temporary HL, whereas HL from the combination of a stimulant and an opioid often presented with greater HL in the mid-frequency range. Reports of temporary vertigo or imbalance were mainly associated with illicit drugs. HL associated with misuse of prescription opioids was typically sudden or rapidly progressive, bilateral, moderately severe to profound, and in almost all cases permanent. The misuse of prescription opioids occasionally resulted in peripheral VL, especially when the opioid misuse was long term. Chronic alcohol misuse tended to associate with high-frequency sudden or progressive sensorineural hearing loss, or retrocochlear dysfunction, and a high occurrence of central vestibular dysfunction and imbalance. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, chronic substance misuse associates with potential ototoxic effects, resulting in temporary or permanent hearing and/or vestibular dysfunction. However, there are notable limitations to the evidence from the extant literature including a lack of objective test measures used to describe hearing or vestibular effects associated with substance misuse, small study sample sizes, reliance on case studies, lack of controlling for confounders related to health, age, sex, and other substance-use factors. Future large-scale studies with prospective study designs are needed to further ascertain the role and risk factors of substance misuse on auditory and vestibular function and to further clinical management practices.

A National Survey of the Infrastructure and Scope of Practice for Gastroenterology Hospitalists.

BACKGROUND: Hospital-based specialty-trained physicians have become more prevalent with emerging data suggesting benefit in consult and procedure volume, reduced complication rates, and increased practice productivity. Interest in gastroenterology (GI) hospitalist programs has increased in recent years. However, little is known regarding the types of GI hospitalist models that currently exist. AIMS: To characterize the infrastructure of GI hospitalist models across the USA. METHODS: A 50-question survey was distributed to the GI Hospitalist Special Interest Group of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Information on demographics, hospital infrastructure, and compensation were collected. RESULTS: 31 of 33 (94%) GI hospitalists completed the questionnaire. Respondents were mostly male (65%), white (48%) or Asian (42%). Most GI hospitalists spent at least half of their clinical time dedicated to the inpatient consultation service (73%), during which they had no other clinical duties. Most services had endoscopy suites with dedicated inpatient endoscopy rooms (66%), over 4 h allotted for procedures (83%), and were available on weekends (62%). Over half of GI hospitalists reported having outpatient duties, the most common being performance of direct access endoscopy (69%). Outside of clinical responsibilities, GI hospitalists were most frequently involved in clinical education or fellowship program leadership (48%). Most GI hospitalists were salaried with an incentive-based bonus based on work relative value units. CONCLUSION: GI hospitalist programs are varied throughout the USA but key commonalities exist between most programs.

Deprescription of aspirin for primary prevention is uncommon at discharge in hospitalised patients with gastrointestinal bleeding.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines recommend against aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events in individuals with a history of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). It is unknown how often patients on primary prevention aspirin hospitalised with GIB have aspirin discontinued at discharge. AIMS: To determine the rate of aspirin deprescription and explore long-term outcomes in patients taking aspirin for primary prevention of cardiovascular events. METHODS: We evaluated all patients hospitalised at Yale-New Haven Hospital between January 2014 and October 2021 with GIB who were on aspirin for primary prevention. Our primary endpoint was the frequency of aspirin deprescription at discharge. Our secondary endpoints were post-discharge hospitalisations for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) or GIB. Time-to-event analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test. RESULTS: We identified 320 patients with GIB on aspirin for primary prevention: median age was 72 (interquartile range [IQR] 61-81) years and 297 (92.8%) were on aspirin 81 mg daily. Only 25 (9.0%) patients surviving their hospitalisation were deprescribed aspirin at discharge. Among 260 patients with follow-up (median 1103 days; IQR 367-1670), MACE developed post-discharge in 2/25 (8.0%) with aspirin deprescription versus 37/235 (15.7%) with aspirin continuation (log-rank p = 0.28). 0/25 patients with aspirin deprescription had subsequent hospitalisation for GIB versus 17/235 (7.2%) who continued aspirin (log-rank p = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Aspirin for primary cardiovascular prevention was rarely deprescribed at discharge in patients hospitalised with GIB. Processes designed to ensure appropriate deprescription of aspirin are crucial to improve adherence to guidelines, thereby improving the risk-benefit ratio in patients at high risk of subsequent GIB hospitalisations with minimal increased risk of MACE.

Increased Mortality in Patients Undergoing Inpatient Endoscopy During the Early COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic led to the restructuring of most healthcare systems, but the impact on patients undergoing inpatient endoscopic procedures is unknown. We sought to identify factors associated with 30-day mortality among patients undergoing inpatient endoscopy before and during the first wave of the pandemic within an academic tertiary care center. METHODS: We studied patients who underwent inpatient endoscopic procedures from March 1-May 31 in 2020 (COVID-19 era), the peak of the pandemic's first wave across the care center studied, and in March 1-May 31, 2018 and 2019 (control). Patient demographics and hospitalization/procedure data were compared between groups. Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with 30-day mortality. RESULTS: Inpatient endoscopy volume decreased in 2020 with a higher proportion of urgent procedures, increased proportion of patients receiving blood transfusions, and a 10.1% mortality rate. In 2020, male gender, further distance from hospital, need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and procedures conducted outside the endoscopy suite were associated with increased risk of 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing endoscopy during the pandemic had higher proportions of ICU admission, more urgent indications, and higher rates of 30-day mortality. Greater proportions of urgent endoscopy cases may be due to hospital restructuring or patient reluctance to seek hospital care during a pandemic. Demographic and procedural characteristics associated with higher mortality risk may be potential areas to improve outcomes during future pandemic hospital restructuring efforts.

Hearing and Vestibular Loss with Misuse of Opioids and Illicit Drugs: A Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this review was to summarize the literature regarding the effects of opioids and illicit drugs on the auditory and vestibular systems. METHODS: Data were sourced from published papers reporting hearing loss (HL) and/or vestibular loss (VL) following misuse or overdose of opioids or illicit drugs. Most papers consisted of retrospective single-case reports, with few retrospective reviews or prospective cohort studies. Search terms included variations of HL, VL, opioids, and illicit drugs. Search results yielded 51 articles published between 1976 and 2021. A total of 44 articles were reviewed after excluding studies that were not available in English (n = 3), only described acute effects in healthy cohorts (n = 3) or only described general health aspects in a group on methadone maintenance (n = 1). RESULTS: Sixteen studies reported ototoxicity from illicit drugs, 27 from prescription opioids, and 1 was unspecified. This review shows that HL associated with amphetamines and cocaine was typically sudden, bilateral, and temporary. HL from cocaine/crack and heroin often presented with greatest losses in the mid-frequency range. HL associated with opioids was typically sudden, bilateral, moderately severe to profound, and in most cases permanent. The literature is sparse regarding VL from illicit drugs and opioids. CONCLUSION: Practitioners who see patients for sudden or rapidly progressive HL or VL with no apparent cause should inquire about misuse of illicit drugs and opioids, particularly when the HL does not respond to steroid treatment.

Characterizing Polarity Sensitivity in Cochlear Implant Recipients: Demographic Effects and Potential Implications for Estimating Neural Health.

Stimulus polarity can affect both physiological and perceptual measures in cochlear-implant recipients. Large differences between polarities for various outcome measures (e.g., eCAP threshold, amplitude, or slope) theoretically reflect poorer neural health, whereas smaller differences reflect better neural health. Therefore, we expect large polarity effects to be correlated with other measures shown to contribute to poor neural health, such as advanced age or prolonged deafness. Our earlier studies using the electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) demonstrated differences in polarity effects between users of Cochlear and Advanced Bionics devices when device-specific clinical pulse designs were used. Since the stimuli differed slightly between devices, the first goal of this study was to determine whether small, clinically relevant differences in pulse phase duration (PD) have a significant impact on eCAP polarity effects to potentially explain the device differences observed previously. Polarity effects were quantified as the difference in eCAP thresholds, mean normalized amplitudes, and slope of the amplitude growth function obtained for anodic-first versus cathodic-first biphasic pulses. The results showed that small variations in PD did not explain the observed differences in eCAP polarity effects between devices. Therefore, eCAP polarity sensitivity measures are relatively robust to small differences in pulse parameters. However, it remains unclear what underlies the observed manufacturer differences, which may limit the utility of eCAP polarity sensitivity measures. The second goal was to characterize polarity sensitivity in a large group of CI recipients (65 ears) to relate polarity sensitivity to age and duration of deafness as a proxy for neural health. The same pulse parameters were used for both device groups. The only significant predictors of eCAP polarity effects were age for threshold and amplitude polarity effects for Cochlear recipients and age and duration of deafness for slope for AB recipients. However, three of these four correlations were in the opposite direction of what was expected. These results suggest that eCAP polarity sensitivity measures likely reflect different mechanisms than the effects that age and duration of deafness induce on the peripheral auditory system.

The Role of the Gastrointestinal Hospitalist in Optimizing Endoscopic Operations.

The gastroenterology (GI) hospitalist model has improved endoscopic operations through improved interdisciplinary coordination, efficiencies introduced in endoscopy unit workflow, and increased patient access to both inpatient and outpatient GI care. The challenges and opportunities associated with a GI hospitalist model and supporting a GI hospitalist team are reviewed, especially in relation to advanced endoscopy. The roles of the GI hospitalist in endoscopy quality measurement and value-based care are also explored. Greater awareness of the GI hospitalist model and tailoring it to fit the needs of the GI practice or endoscopy unit will be key to practice sustainability and growth.

Testing Speech Perception with Cochlear Implants Through Digital Audio Streaming in a Virtual Sound Booth: A Feasibility Study.

OBJECTIVE: For patients who have received cochlear implants (CIs), speech-perception testing requires specialized equipment. This limits locations where these services can be provided, which can introduce barriers for provision of care. Providing speech test stimuli directly to the CI via wireless digital audio streaming (DAS) or wired direct audio input (DAI) allows for testing without the need for a sound booth (SB). A few studies have investigated the use of DAI for testing speech perception in CIs, but none have evaluated DAS. The goal of this study was to compare speech perception testing in CI users via DAS versus a traditional SB to determine if differences exist between the two presentation modes. We also sought to determine whether pre-processing the DAS signal with room acoustics (reverberation and noise floor) to emulate the SB environment would affect performance differences between the SB and DAS. DESIGN: In Experiment 1, speech perception was measured for monosyllabic words in quiet and sentences in quiet and in noise. Scores were obtained in a SB and compared to those obtained via DAS with unprocessed speech (DAS-U) for 11 adult CI users (12 ears). In Experiment 2, speech perception was measured for sentences in noise, where both the speech and noise stimuli were pre-processed to emulate the SB environment. Scores were obtained for 11 adult CI users (12 ears) in the SB, via DAS-U, and via DAS with the processed speech (DAS-P). RESULTS: For Experiment 1, there was no significant difference between SB and DAS-U conditions for words or sentences in quiet. However, DAS-U scores were significantly better than SB scores for sentences in noise. For Experiment 2, there was no significant difference between the SB and DAS-P conditions. Similar to Experiment 1, DAS-U scores were significantly better than SB or DAS-P scores. CONCLUSIONS: By pre-processing the test materials to emulate the noise and reverberation characteristics of a traditional SB, we can account for differences in speech-perception scores between those obtained via DAS and in a SB.

Evidence of Neural Microstructure Abnormalities in Type I Chiari Malformation: Associations Among Fiber Tract Integrity, Pain, and Cognitive Dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Previous case-control investigations of type I Chiari malformation (CMI) have reported cognitive deficits and microstructural white matter abnormalities, as measured by diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). CMI is also typically associated with pain, including occipital headache, but the relationship between pain symptoms and microstructure is not known. METHODS: Eighteen CMI patients and 18 adult age- and education-matched control participants underwent DTI, were tested using digit symbol coding and digit span tasks, and completed a self-report measure of chronic pain. Tissue microstructure indices were used to examine microstructural abnormalities in CMI as compared with healthy controls. Group differences in DTI parameters were then reassessed after controlling for self-reported pain. Finally, DTI parameters were correlated with performance on the digit symbol coding and digit span tasks within each group. RESULTS: CMI patients exhibited greater fractional anisotropy (FA), lower radial diffusivity, and lower mean diffusivity in multiple brain regions compared with controls in diffuse white matter regions. Group differences no longer existed after controlling for self-reported pain. A significant correlation between FA and the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status coding performance was observed for controls but not for the CMI group. CONCLUSIONS: Diffuse microstructural abnormalities appear to be a feature of CMI, manifesting predominantly as greater FA and less diffusivity on DTI sequences. These white matter changes are associated with the subjective pain experience of CMI patients and may reflect reactivity to neuroinflammatory responses. However, this hypothesis will require further deliberate testing in future studies.

Type I Chiari malformation, RBANS performance, and brain morphology: Connecting the dots on cognition and macrolevel brain structure.

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic descent of cerebellar tonsils into the cervical spine in Chiari malformation Type I (CMI) is typically associated with occipital headache. Accumulating evidence from experimental studies suggests cognitive effects of CMI. The aim of the current study was to examine the relationship between cognition and CMI using a battery of standardized neuropsychological and symptom inventory instruments. METHOD: Eighteen untreated adults with CMI, and 18 gender, age, and education matched healthy controls completed the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS), and standardized measures of pain, mood, and disability. Morphometric measurements of key neural and osseous elements were also obtained from structural brain magnetic resonance images, for correlation with symptom outcomes. RESULTS: CMI patients exhibited deficits in RBANS attention, immediate memory, delayed memory, and total score. After controlling for pain and associated affective disturbance, the significant group effect for RBANS attention remained. CMI patients also presented seven morphometric differences comprising the cerebellum and posterior cranial fossa compartment that differed from healthy controls, some of which were associated with self-reported pain and disability. Notably, group differences in tonsillar position were associated with self-reported pain, disability, and delayed memory. CONCLUSION: Adult CMI is associated with domain-specific cognitive change, detectable using a standard clinical instrument. The extent of cognitive impairment is independent of pain or affective symptomatology and may be related to the key pathognomonic feature of the condition. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Are There Age Differences in Consolidated Episodic Memory?

Background/Study Context: While most aging research on memory uses a retention interval of one hour or less, episodic consolidation takes longer (e.g., 6-24 hours for synaptic consolidation). In three experiments, we examined age differences in recall followed by recognition in which the retention interval was varied in younger and older adults. METHODS: In Experiment 1 (n = 24 for both age groups), zero-, 1- and 24-hour retention intervals were used for recall for all participants, and a 24-hour retention interval was used for recognition. In Experiment 2 (n = 24 for both age groups), just a 24-hour retention interval was used. In Experiment 3 (n = 20 for both age groups), a within-subjects design was used in which participants recalled one word list after one hour and again after 24 hours, and recalled another word list just after 24 hours (with recognition for both conditions after the 24-hour recall). RESULTS: In Experiment 1, older adults recalled fewer words at both the 1- and 24-hour retention intervals, but the magnitude of the age difference did not differ. In Experiment 2 (just 24-hour retention interval), there were no age differences in recall. In Experiment 3, in the two-recall condition, older adults showed lower recall at both 1-hour and 24-hour retention intervals (but the magnitude of the age difference remained constant across retention interval). In the single-recall just 24-hour retention condition, there were no age differences. There were no age differences in recognition in any of the three experiments. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that recall declines for a 24-hour retention interval relative to a zero or one-hour retention interval (Experiments 1 and 3) for both age groups. However, when the first recall attempt occurs after a 24-hour retention interval, there are no age differences. These replicated results suggest that older adults do not benefit as much as younger adults from pre-consolidated rehearsal, but that rehearsal-based age differences do not increase in magnitude from the last rehearsal to memory consolidation. Furthermore, (along with), the present results indicate that there are no age differences in recall when the first recall attempt occurs after a long retention interval - when memory consolidation is likely to have occurred before the first retrieval attempt.

The Effect of Stimulus Polarity on the Relation Between Pitch Ranking and ECAP Spread of Excitation in Cochlear Implant Users.

Although modern cochlear implants (CIs) use cathodic-leading symmetrical biphasic pulses to stimulate the auditory nerve, a growing body of evidence suggests that anodic-leading pulses may be more effective. The positive polarity has been shown to produce larger electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) amplitudes, steeper slope of the amplitude growth function, and broader spread of excitation (SOE) patterns. Polarity has also been shown to influence pitch perception. It remains unclear how polarity affects the relation between physiological SOE and psychophysical pitch perception. Using a within-subject design, we examined the correlation between performance on a pitch-ranking task and spatial separation between SOE patterns for anodic and cathodic-leading symmetric biphasic pulses for 14 CI ears. Overall, there was no effect of polarity on either ECAP SOE patterns, pitch ranking performance, or the relation between the two. This result is likely due the use of symmetric biphasic pulses, which may have reduced the size of the effect previously observed for pseudomonophasic pulses. Further research is needed to determine if a pseudomonophasic stimulus might further improve the relation between physiology and pitch perception.

Use of Direct-Connect for Remote Speech-Perception Testing in Cochlear Implants.

OBJECTIVES: Previous research has demonstrated the feasibility of programming cochlear implants (CIs) via telepractice. To effectively use telepractice in a comprehensive manner, all components of a clinical CI visit should be validated using remote technology. Speech-perception testing is important for monitoring outcomes with a CI, but it has yet to be validated for remote service delivery. The objective of this study, therefore, was to evaluate the feasibility of using direct audio input (DAI) as an alternative to traditional sound-booth speech-perception testing for serving people with CIs via telepractice. Specifically, our goal was to determine whether there was a significant difference in speech-perception scores between the remote DAI (telepractice) and the traditional (in-person) sound-booth conditions. DESIGN: This study used a prospective, split-half-design to test speech perception in the remote DAI and in-person sound-booth conditions. Thirty-two adults and older children with CIs participated; all had a minimum of 6 months of experience with their device. Speech-perception tests included the consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) words, Hearing-in-Noise test (HINT) sentences, and Arizona Biomedical Institute at Arizona State University (AzBio) sentences. All three tests were administered at levels of 50 and 60 dBA in quiet. Sentence stimuli were also presented in 4-talker babble at signal to noise ratios (SNRs) of +10 and +5 dB for both the 50- and 60-dBA presentation levels. A repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to assess the effects of location (remote, in person), stimulus level (50, 60 dBA), and SNR (if applicable; quiet, +10, +5 dB) on each outcome measure (CNC, HINT, AzBio). RESULTS: The results showed no significant effect of location for any of the tests administered (p > 0.1). There was no significant effect of presentation level for CNC words or phonemes (p > 0.2). There was, however, a significant effect of level (p < 0.001) for both HINT and AzBio sentences, but the direction of the effect was opposite of what was expected-scores were poorer for 60 dBA than for 50 dBA. For both sentence tests, there was a significant effect of SNR, with poorer performance for worsening SNRs, as expected. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that speech-perception testing via telepractice is feasible using DAI. There was no significant difference in scores between the remote and in-person conditions, which suggests that DAI testing can be used as a valid alternative to standard sound-booth testing. The primary limitation is that the calibration tools are presently not commercially available.