Major adverse cardiovascular events of enzalutamide versus abiraterone in prostate cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: While the cardiovascular risks of androgen receptor pathway inhibitors have been studied, they were seldom compared directly. This study compares the risks of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) between enzalutamide and abiraterone among prostate cancer (PCa) patients. METHODS: Adult PCa patients receiving either enzalutamide or abiraterone in addition to androgen deprivation therapy in Hong Kong between 1 December 1999 and 31 March 2021 were identified in this retrospective cohort study. Patients who switched between enzalutamide and abiraterone, initiated abiraterone used without steroids, or experienced prior cardiac events were excluded. Patients were followed-up until 30 September 2021. The primary outcomes were MACE, a composite of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), Heart failure (HF), or all-cause mortality and a composite of adverse cardiovascular events (CACE) not including all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes were individual components of MACE. Inverse probability treatment weighting was used to balance covariates between treatment groups. RESULTS: In total, 1015 patients were analyzed (456 enzalutamide users and 559 abiraterone users; mean age 70.6 ± 8.8 years old) over a median follow-up duration of 11.3 (IQR: 5.3-21.3) months. Enzalutamide users had significantly lower risks of 4P-MACE (weighted hazard ratio (wHR) 0.71 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.59-0.86], p < 0.001) and CACE (wHR 0.63 [95% CI: 0.42-0.96], p = 0.031), which remained consistent in multivariable analysis. Such an association may be stronger in patients aged ≥65 years or without diabetes mellitus and was independent of bilateral orchidectomy. Enzalutamide users also had significantly lower risks of MI (wHR 0.57 [95% CI: 0.33-0.97], p = 0.040) and all-cause mortality (wHR 0.71 [95% CI: 0.59-0.85], p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Enzalutamide was associated with lower cardiovascular risks than abiraterone in PCa patients.

Attitudes, beliefs, and practices toward end-of-life care among physicians in sub-Saharan Africa.

Introduction: as the opportunity to receive life-sustaining treatments expands in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), so do potential ethical dilemmas. Little is known regarding the attitudes, beliefs, and practices of physicians in SSA regarding end-of-life care ethics. Methods: we used validated survey items addressing physician end-of-life care views and added SSA-context specific items. We identified a convenience sample using the authors' existing African professional contacts and snowball recruitment. Participants were invited via email to an anonymous online survey. Results: we contacted 78 physicians who practice critical care in Africa, and 68% (n=53) completed the survey. Of those, 66% were male, 55% were aged 36-45, 75% were Christian. They were from Kenya (30%), Zambia (28%), Rwanda (25%), Botswana (11%), and other countries (6%). Most (75%) agreed that competent patients can refuse even life-saving care. Only 32% agreed that their hospital had clear policies regarding withdrawing and withholding care, 11% agreed that their country had legal precedent for end-of-life care, and 43% believed that doctors could face legal or financial consequences for allowing patients to die by forgoing treatment. Pain control at the end of life, even if it may hasten death, was supported by 83%. However, 75% felt that clinicians undertreat pain due to fear of hastening death. Conclusion: participants strongly supported patient autonomy and end-of-life pain control but expressed concern that inadequate policy and legal frameworks exist to guide care and that pain is undertreated. Humane and actionable end-of-life care frameworks are needed to guide decisions in SSA.

A small animal model of chronic hepatitis E infection using immunocompromised rats.

Background & Aims: HEV variants such as swine genotypes within Paslahepevirus species balayani (HEV-A) and rat HEV (Rocahepevirus ratti; HEV-C1) cause chronic hepatitis E in immunocompromised individuals. There are few reliable and accessible small animal models that accurately reflect chronic HEV infection. We aimed to develop an immunocompromised rat model of chronic hepatitis E infection. Methods: In this animal model infection study, rats were immunosuppressed with a drug combination (prednisolone, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil) commonly taken by transplant recipients. Rats were challenged with human- and rat-derived HEV-C1 strains or a human-derived HEV-A strain. Viral load, liver function, liver histology, humoural, and cellular immune responses were monitored. Results: A high-dose (HD) immunosuppressive regimen consistently prolonged human- and rat-derived HEV-C1 infection in rats (up to 12 weeks post infection) compared with transient infections in low-dose (LD) immunosuppressant-treated and immunocompetent (IC) rats. Mean HEV-C1 viral loads in stool, serum, and liver tissue were higher in HD regimen-treated rats than in LD or IC rats (p <0.05). Alanine aminotransferase elevation was observed in chronically infected rats, which was consistent with histological hepatitis and HEV-C1 antigen expression in liver tissue. None (0/6) of the HD regimen-treated, 5/6 LD regimen-treated, and 6/6 IC rats developed antibodies to HEV-C1 in species-specific immunoblots. Reversal of immunosuppression was associated with clearance of viraemia and restoration of HEV-C1-specific humoural and cellular immune responses in HD regimen-treated rats, mimicking patterns in treated patients with chronic hepatitis E. Viral load suppression was observed with i.p. ribavirin treatment. HD regimen-treated rats remained unsusceptible to HEV-A infection. Conclusions: We developed a scalable immunosuppressed rat model of chronic hepatitis E that closely mimics this infection phenotype in transplant recipients. Lay summary: Convenient small animal models are required for the study of chronic hepatitis E in humans. We developed an animal model of chronic hepatitis E by suppressing immune responses of rats with drugs commonly taken by humans as organ transplant rejection prophylaxis. This model closely mimicked features of chronic hepatitis E in humans.

Risk of New-Onset Prostate Cancer for Metformin Versus Sulfonylurea Use in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the risks of new-onset prostate cancer between metformin and sulfonylurea users with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). METHODS: This population-based retrospective cohort study included male patients with T2DM presenting to public hospitals/clinics in Hong Kong between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2009. We only included patients prescribed either, but not both, metformin or sulfonylurea. All patients were followed up until December 31, 2019. The primary outcome was new-onset prostate cancer and the secondary outcome was all-cause mortality. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed between metformin and sulfonylurea users based on demographics, comorbidities, antidiabetic and cardiovascular medications, fasting blood glucose level, and hemoglobin A1c level. Subgroup analyses based on age and use of androgen deprivation therapy were performed. RESULTS: The final study cohort consisted of 25,695 metformin users (mean [SD] age, 65.2 [11.8] years) and 25,695 matched sulfonylurea users (mean [SD] age, 65.3 [11.8] years) with a median follow-up duration of 119.6 months (interquartile range, 91.7-139.6 months) after 1:1 propensity score matching of 66,411 patients. Metformin users had lower risks of new-onset prostate cancer (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69-0.93; P=.0031) and all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.86-0.92; P<.0001) than sulfonylurea users. Metformin use was more protective against prostate cancer but less protective against all-cause mortality in patients aged <65 years (P for trend <.0001 for both) compared with patients aged ≥65 years. Metformin users had lower risk of all-cause mortality than sulfonylurea users, regardless of the use of androgen deprivation therapy (P for trend <.0001) among patients who developed prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Metformin use was associated with significantly lower risks of new-onset prostate cancer and all-cause mortality than sulfonylurea use in male patients with T2DM.