ABSTRACT
While transcatheter valve-in-valve (ViV) implantation may reduce the number of lifetime surgical reinterventions in some patients with congenital heart disease, in other patients the bioprosthetic valve ring can lead to patient-prosthesis mismatch due to reduction of internal diameter if a transcatheter valve is implanted. A 49-year-old woman with multiple prior cardiac surgeries presented with heart failure due to bioprosthetic tricuspid valve stenosis. Initial predilation valvuloplasty suggested conventional ViV implant would produce patient-prosthesis mismatch, therefore, we intentionally fractured the bioprosthetic valve ring to facilitate optimal hemodynamics with implantation of a 29 mm transcatheter valve.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Bioprosthesis , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Heart Valve Prosthesis , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Female , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Humans , Middle Aged , Prosthesis Design , Prosthesis Failure , Treatment Outcome , Tricuspid Valve/diagnostic imaging , Tricuspid Valve/surgeryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare a novel technique using a torque device to manage figure-of-eight suture tension for venous access hemostasis in patients who have undergone atrial septal defect (ASD) or patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure. BACKGROUND: Large bore venous access has become increasingly important in transcatheter procedures, but management of hemostasis can be time-consuming and/or resource intensive. As such, various techniques have sought to provide cost effective and safe alternatives to manual compression. We describe a modification of the figure-of-eight suture technique wherein we apply a torque device to manage variable suture tension instead of tying a knot and compare it to the standard figure-of-eight suture technique. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of 40 consecutive patients who underwent ASD or PFO closure, 20 of whom underwent standard figure-of-eight technique and 20 of whom underwent figure-of-eight with torque device modification. Bleeding Academic Research Consortium definitions were used to categorize bleeding events. RESULTS: The groups were similar in age, gender, weight, aspirin use, platelet count, procedure time, hemoglobin, and international normalized ratio. Standard figure-of-eight suture had seven patients with bleeding, with six classified as BARC II and one as BARC I. Figure-of-eight plus torque device had three patients with bleeding, with two classified BARC II and one as BARC I. There were no incidences of hematoma in either group. CONCLUSION: The torque device suture technique is a unique modification of the figure-of-eight suture technique to achieve venous hemostasis. In addition, the modification allows secure and variable suture tension as well as easy removal by nursing staff.