Cervical length measurement for the prediction of preterm birth in multiple pregnancies: a systematic review and bivariate meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To review the literature on cervical length as a predictor of preterm birth in asymptomatic women with a multiple pregnancy. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase and reference lists of included articles to identify all studies that reported on the accuracy of cervical length for predicting preterm birth in asymptomatic women with a multiple pregnancy. We scored study characteristics and study quality, and extracted data in order to construct two-by-two tables cross-classifying cervical length and preterm delivery. Meta-analysis using a bivariate model was performed. Summary receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves were generated for various test characteristics and outcome definitions. RESULTS: We found 21 studies reporting on 2757 women. There was a large variation in gestational age at measurement, cut-off point for cervical length and definition of preterm birth. The summary ROC curve indicated a good predictive capacity of short cervical length for preterm birth. Summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity for preterm birth before 34 weeks' gestation were 78% and 66%, respectively, for 35 mm, 41% and 87% for 30 mm, 36% and 94% for 25 mm and 30% and 94% for 20 mm. CONCLUSIONS: In women with a multiple pregnancy, second-trimester cervical length is a strong predictor of preterm birth. In the absence of effective preventive strategies, there is currently no place in clinical practice for cervical length measurement in this population. However, future studies should evaluate preventive interventions in women with multiple pregnancies and a short cervix, and cervical length should be measured in any trial studying preventive strategies in multiple pregnancies.

Medical treatment after peripheral bypass surgery over the past decade.

OBJECTIVE: The Dutch Bypass and Oral anticoagulants or Aspirin (BOA) Study demonstrated that in patients with peripheral arterial disease after bypass surgery oral anticoagulants were more effective in preventing venous graft occlusions than aspirin, while aspirin was more effective in non-venous grafts. We evaluated if this finding was implemented in the clinical practice of former BOA participants by reconstructing a 10-year overview of their applied various drug treatments including anti-hypertensive and lipid-lowering drugs. METHODS: In 482 patients from six centers that contributed most patients anti-thrombotic, anti-hypertensive, and lipid-lowering drug use was recorded at baseline (n = 478), retrospectively up to two years after BOA (n = 388), and prospectively for patients still alive between 2005 and 2009 (n = 209). RESULTS: At baseline, 54% of patients received anti-thrombotics which increased to 96% at follow-up. At baseline 15% of patients were treated with lipid-lowering drugs and 49% with anti-hypertensives. This increased over time to 65% and 76%, respectively. CONCLUSION: After the BOA Study its recommendations were applied marginally. Despite improvements over time, current lipid-lowering and anti-hypertensive drug use remained suboptimal. Our trend analyses, however, should be interpreted with caution, because drug use and compliance in survivors might be better than average.