Does Anterior Impaction Affect Radiographic Outcomes of Pilon Fractures?

Background: The outcomes of pilon fractures are multifactorial. Anterior articular impaction requires sagittal plane correction (anterior distal tibia angle (ADTA)) with articular reduction. However, there is a risk of avascular necrosis of the articular fragments and postoperative tibiotalar arthritis. The purpose of this study was to determine if the presence of anterior impaction affects radiographic alignment after definitive fixation. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent operative management for pilon fractures at two academic, level 1 trauma centers between September 2005-September 2016. Fractures were categorized as having anterior impaction or no anterior impaction after review of preoperative radiographic and computer tomography imaging. Patient demographics and postoperative time to union was recorded. Quality of reduction was measured using (ADTA) (degrees), lateral distal tibia angle (LDTA) (degrees), and lateral talar station (LTS) (millimeters) from postoperative radiographs. Statistical analysis compared fracture patterns with anterior impaction to those without. Results: 208 patients met inclusion criteria. 132 fractures (63.4%) were determined to have anterior impaction. Cohorts were similar in demographics and medical comorbidities (p>0.05). Mean ADTA, LTDA, and LTS for the anterior impaction group 83.5°, 89.7°, and 2.4mm versus 84.6°, 89.9°, and 2.0mm in the group without anterior impaction. Cohorts significantly differed in ADTA(p=0.01), but not LDTA(p=0.12) or LTS(p=0.44). No significant differences were found between cohorts with infection (>0.05), nonunion(p=0.76), unplanned reoperation(p=0.56), or amputation(p=0.34). Conclusion: This study demonstrated no significant differences in the coronal or sagittal plane alignment when comparing definitively fixed pilon fractures with and without anterior impaction. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the longterm clinical impact of failing to restore ADTA. Level of Evidence: III.

Does surgical approach affect sagittal plane alignment and pilon fracture outcomes?

PURPOSE: Sagittal plane alignment beyond articular reduction and its effect on clinical outcomes has not been emphasized. Surgical approach may influence a surgeon's ability to correct the sagittal plane alignment. The purpose of our study was to evaluate how surgical approach impacts anterior distal tibial angle (ADTA) and lateral talar station (LTS). Our hypothesis was that the anterolateral (AL) approach would improve the sagittal plane parameters due to the primary plate placement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent operative management for pilon fractures at 2 ACS Level 1 Academic Trauma Centers. Clinical data points including demographics, comorbidities, AO/OTA classification, surgical approach, and complications were recorded. Quality of reduction was measured using the ADTA, lateral distal tibia angle (LDTA), and lateral talar station (LTS) from radiographs. RESULTS: 580 pilon fractures met inclusion criteria. When compared to the AL approach, the modified anteromedial (AM) approach had decreased rates of local wound care, and unplanned reoperations. The AM approach had increased rates of superficial infection, deep infection, non-union, and amputations. There was no difference in ADTA, LDTA, or LTS between the AM and AL approach (P = 0.49, P = 0.41, P = 0.85). There was a difference in LTS with tobacco users (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The sagittal plane alignment does not appear to be affected by the surgical approach. Therefore, the surgical approach to pilon fractures should be based on the fracture pattern and the patient's soft tissue envelope. This study shows that the AM is a relatively safe and effective approach to complex fractures and the surgeon should consider the specific fracture pattern and patient soft tissue envelope when choosing the specific approach.

Extent and Morbidity of Lateralization of a Trochanteric Fixation Nail Blade.

This study examined the incidence and risk factors associated with lateral helical blade migration and trochanteric pain with the trochanteric fixation nail. A retrospective review was performed of 141 cases of pertrochanteric femur fracture treated with a trochanteric fixation nail at a level I trauma center over a period of 42 months. Exclusion criteria included follow-up of less than 60 days, preexisting osteonecrosis of the femoral head, and prophylactic trochanteric fixation nail treatment. Patient demographics, operative findings, and radiographic findings were recorded. Medical records were reviewed to identify symptomatic hardware. Overall, 27 patients (19.1%) were symptomatic, and 3 (2.1%) required revision surgery for blade prominence. Of the patients, 42 (30%) had lateralization of greater than 1 cm, and 16 of these (38.1%) were symptomatic (P<.02). A risk factor for lateralization was AO classification, with 46.1% of type A2 fractures showing lateralization of greater than 1 cm. The quality of calcar reduction nearly reached statistical significance, and 44.8% of patients who had inadequate reduction had lateralization of greater than 1 cm compared with 26.4% of patients who had adequate reduction (P=.054). Lateralization of greater than 1 cm was directly associated with the presence of symptoms (P<.001) and removal of hardware because of trochanteric pain (P=.007). Multivariate analysis showed that increasing tip-apex distance, inadequate calcar reduction, and greater fracture severity were predictive of excessive lateralization of greater than 1 cm. Nearly 20% of patients had lateral hip pain associated with cephalomedullary fixation. Final lateralization of the helical blade of greater than 1 cm was a very strong predictor of symptoms. During preoperative counseling, surgeons should caution patients about this relatively frequent and likely underreported complication. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(5):e886-e891.].