Real-world effectiveness of ixazomib combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: the REMIX study.

Ixazomib (IXA) is an oral proteasome inhibitor (PI) used in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IXA-Rd) for patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The REMIX study is one of the largest prospective, real-world analysis of the effectiveness of IXA-Rd in the setting of RRMM. Conducted in France between August 2017 and October 2019, the REMIX study, a non-interventional prospective study, included 376 patients receiving IXA-Rd in second line or later and followed for at least 24 months. Primary endpoint was the median progression-free survival (mPFS). Median age was 71 years (Q1-Q3 65.0 - 77.5) with 18.4% of participants older than 80 years. IXA-Rd was initiated in L2, L3 and L4 + for 60.4%, 18.1% and 21.5%, respectively. mPFS was 19.1 months (95% CI [15.9, 21.5]) and overall response rate (ORR) was 73.1%. mPFS was 21.5, 21.9 and 5.8 months in patients receiving IXA-Rd as L2, L3, L4 + respectively. Among patients receiving IXA-Rd in L2 and L3, mPFS was similar for patients previously exposed to lenalidomide (19.5 months) than for those lenalidomide naive (not exposed, 22.6 months, p = 0.29). mPFS was 19.1 months in patients younger than 80 years and 17.4 months in those 80 years or older (p = 0.06) with similar ORR (72.4% and 76.8%) in both subgroups. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 78.2% of patients including 40.7% of treatment-related AE. IXA discontinuation was due to toxicity in 21% of patients. To conclude, the results of the REMIX study are consistent with the results of Tourmaline-MM1 and confirm the benefit of IXA-Rd combination in real life. It shows the interest of IXA-Rd in an older and frailer population, with an acceptable effectiveness and tolerance.

Safe and prolonged survival with long-term exposure to pomalidomide in relapsed/refractory myeloma.

BACKGROUND: The IFM2009-02 trial studied pomalidomide (4 mg daily, 21/28 versus 28/28) and dexamethasone in very advanced relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We observed that 40% of patients had a prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and subsequently overall survival (OS). We sought to analyze the characteristics of these patients and study the effect of long exposure to pomalidomide. DESIGN: We separated the studied population into two groups: 3 months to 1 year (<1 year) and more than 1 year (≥1 year) of treatment with pomalidomide and dexamethasone based on clinical judgment and historical control studies. We then analyzed the characteristics of patients according to duration of treatment. RESULTS: The overall response rate (ORR) for the <1-year group was 43%, the median PFS 4.6 months [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 3.8-6.4] with only 6% at 12 months, and the median OS was 15 months (11.7-20.3) and 40% at 18 months. For the ≥1-year group, the response rate and survival were strikingly different, ORR at 83%, median PFS 20.7 months (14.7-35.4), median OS not reached, and 91% at 18 months. CONCLUSION: Pomalidomide and dexamethasone favored prolonged and safe exposure to treatment in 40% of heavily treated and end-stage RRMM, a paradigm shift in the natural history of RRMM characterized with a succession of shorter disease-free intervals and ultimately shorter survival. Although an optimization of pomalidomide-dexamethasone regimen is warranted in advanced RRMM, we claim that pomalidomide has proven once more to change the natural history of myeloma in this series, which should be confirmed in a larger study.

Cost-effectiveness of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone vs. bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone in transplant-ineligible U.S. patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a cost-effectiveness assessment of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (Rd) vs bortezomib plus melphalan and prednisone (VMP) as initial treatment for transplant-ineligible patients with newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM), from a U.S. payer perspective. METHODS: A partitioned survival model was developed to estimate expected life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), direct costs and incremental costs per QALY and LY gained associated with use of Rd vs VMP over a patient's lifetime. Information on the efficacy and safety of Rd and VMP was based on data from multinational phase III clinical trials and a network meta-analysis. Pre-progression direct costs included the costs of Rd and VMP, treatment of adverse events (including prophylaxis) and routine care and monitoring associated with MM. Post-progression direct costs included costs of subsequent treatment(s) and routine care and monitoring for progressive disease, all obtained from published literature and estimated from a U.S. payer perspective. Utilities were obtained from the aforementioned trials. Costs and outcomes were discounted at 3% annually. RESULTS: Relative to VMP, use of Rd was expected to result in an additional 2.22 LYs and 1.47 QALYs (discounted). Patients initiated with Rd were expected to incur an additional $78,977 in mean lifetime direct costs (discounted) vs those initiated with VMP. The incremental costs per QALY and per LY gained with Rd vs VMP were $53,826 and $35,552, respectively. In sensitivity analyses, results were found to be most sensitive to differences in survival associated with Rd vs VMP, the cost of lenalidomide and the discount rate applied to effectiveness outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Rd was expected to result in greater LYs and QALYs compared with VMP, with similar overall costs per LY for each regimen. Results of this analysis indicated that Rd may be a cost-effective alternative to VMP as initial treatment for transplant-ineligible patients with MM, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio well within the levels for recent advancements in oncology.

[Pomalidomide for multiple myeloma]. / Le pomalidomide dans le myélome multiple.

Once characterized by a very poor outcome, multiple myeloma (MM) now has a significantly prolonged survival, with major improvements allowed by the use of "novel agents": proteasome inhibitors (first-in-class bortezomib) and immunomodulatory compounds (IMiDs; first-in-class thalidomide and lenalidomide). However, the vast majority - if not all - of patients with MM ultimately end up being refractory to all existing drugs, including these efficient novel agents. There is a clear unmet medical need in this situation, which warrants the development of the next generation of proteasome inhibitors and IMiDs, as well as new drug classes. This review focuses on pomalidomide, the next generation IMiD, recently approved by the US FDA and the EMA for patients with relapsed or refractory MM who have received at least two prior therapies, including lenalidomide and bortezomib, and have demonstrated disease progression on their last therapy.

Deletion of the 1p32 region is a major independent prognostic factor in young patients with myeloma: the IFM experience on 1195 patients.

Deletions of the 1p region appear as a pejorative prognostic factor in multiple myeloma patients (especially 1p22 and 1p32 deletions) but there is a lack of data on the real impact of 1p abnormalities on an important and homogeneous group of patients. To address this issue we studied by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) the incidence and prognostic impact of 1p22 and 1p32 deletions in 1195 patients from the IFM (Institut Francophone du Myélome) cell collection. Chromosome 1p deletions were present in 23.3% of the patients (271): 15.1% (176) for 1p22 and 7.3% (85) for 1p32 regions. In univariate analyses, 1p22 and 1p32 appeared as negative prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS): 1p22: 19.8 months vs 33.6 months (P<0.001) and 1p32: 14.4 months vs 33.6 months (P<0.001); and overall survival (OS): 1p22: 44.2 months vs 96.8 months (P=0.002) and 1p32: 26.7 months vs 96.8 months (P<0.001). In multivariate analyses, 1p22 and 1p32 deletions still appear as independent negative prognostic factors for PFS and OS. In conclusion, our data show that 1p22 and 1p32 deletions are major negative prognostic factors for PFS and OS for patients with MM. We thus suggest that 1p32 deletion should be tested for all patients at diagnosis.

Minor clone provides a reservoir for relapse in multiple myeloma.

Recent studies have provided direct evidence for genetic variegation in subclones for various cancer types. However, little is known about subclonal evolutionary processes according to treatment and subsequent relapse in multiple myeloma (MM). This issue was addressed in a cohort of 24 MM patients treated either with conventional chemotherapy or with the proteasome inhibitor, bortezomib. As MM is a highly heterogeneous disease associated with a large number of chromosomal abnormalities, a subset of secondary genetic events that seem to reflect progression, 1q21 gain, NF-κB-activating mutations, RB1 and TP53 deletions, was examined. By using high-resolution single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays, subclones were identified with nonlinear complex evolutionary histories. Such reordering of the spectrum of genetic lesions, identified in a third of MM patients during therapy, is likely to reflect the selection of genetically distinct subclones, not initially competitive against the dominant population but which survived chemotherapy, thrived and acquired new anomalies. In addition, the emergence of minor subclones at relapse appeared to be significantly associated with bortezomib treatment. These data support the idea that new strategies for future clinical trials in MM should combine targeted therapy and subpopulations' control to eradicate all myeloma subclones in order to obtain long-term remission.

Risk of progression and survival in multiple myeloma relapsing after therapy with IMiDs and bortezomib: a multicenter international myeloma working group study.

Promising new drugs are being evaluated for treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), but their impact should be measured against the expected outcome in patients failing current therapies. However, the natural history of relapsed disease in the current era remains unclear. We studied 286 patients with relapsed MM, who were refractory to bortezomib and were relapsed following, refractory to or ineligible to receive, an IMiD (immunomodulatory drug), had measurable disease, and ECOG PS of 0, 1 or 2. The date patients satisfied the entry criteria was defined as time zero (T(0)). The median age at diagnosis was 58 years, and time from diagnosis to T(0) was 3.3 years. Following T(0), 213 (74%) patients had a treatment recorded with one or more regimens (median=1; range 0-8). The first regimen contained bortezomib in 55 (26%) patients and an IMiD in 70 (33%). A minor response or better was seen to at least one therapy after T(0) in 94 patients (44%) including ≥ partial response in 69 (32%). The median overall survival and event-free survival from T(0) were 9 and 5 months, respectively. This study confirms the poor outcome, once patients become refractory to current treatments. The results provide context for interpreting ongoing trials of new drugs.

Efficacy of bendamustine in relapsed/refractory myeloma patients: results from the French compassionate use program.

One hundred and ten patients with multiple myeloma were treated with bendamustine as part of a French compassionate use program. To receive bendamustine, patients had to present with relapsed or refractory disease after prior therapies that had to include alkylators, steroids, IMiDs and bortezomib. The median number of bendamustine cycles administered was 4 (1-13). The overall response rate (≥ partial response) was 30%, including 2% complete responses. The median progression-free and overall survival for the entire cohort were 9.3 and 12.4 months, respectively. In this series of patients with advanced disease, both the response rate and the duration of response are encouraging and indicate that bendamustine presents a feasible option, which should be considered for the treatment of relapsed/refractory patients.

Les Lymphomes T-NK extraganglionnaires de type nasal : experience du CHU de Nancy. A propos de 9 Cas

Cette etude retrospective et prospective a pour but de decrire les aspects cliniques; biologiques et evolutifs du lymphome T-NK extra-ganglionnaire de type Nasale de stade I et IV chez 9 patients au CHU de Nancy sur une periode de 4 ans (Decembre 2001 a Avril 2005). Chez ces patients ages de plus de 19 ans (19 et 78 ans); le nasosinus etait la localisation la plus frequente (56). Les signes B rencontres chez 6 patients etaient par contre absents chez les 3 autres patients. On note a l'analyse une mediane du taux serique des LDH a 742 UI/l. La recherche du virus d'Epstein Barr par la methode..montre une positivite a Ig G chez 5 patients soit 56 des cas. Le dosage biochimique de la beta2microglobuline montre un taux moyen de .chez 6 patients tandis que 3 patients affichaient un taux normal moyen de. On note a l'immunophenotypage 8 cas l'antigene CD3+; 4 cas de CD7+; 2 cas de CD45 et 3 cas de CD56+. Plusieurs protocoles therapeutiques de la chimiotherapie avec des methodes d'intensification par autogreffe apres irradiation corporelle totale; a la radiotherapie ont ete utilises. Parmi les 9 patients mis sous traitement; 2 etaient en RC; 6 patients etaient consideres en echec therapeutique; un deces lie a la toxicite medicamenteuse a ete constate. La mediane de survie de nos patients etait de 6 mois avec des extremes de 3 a 15 mois. En date de pointe 100 des patients etaient decedes. La recidive est apparue chez 2 patients. Notre etude suggere que la combinaison de la chimiotherapie a haute dose et les methodes d'intensification therapeutique par autogreffe peut etre salvatrice pour ameliorer la survie des patients

Management of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in French hospitals and estimation of associated direct costs: a multi-centre retrospective cohort study.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND BACKGROUND: For relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), a series of novel agents (thalidomide, bortezomib and lenalidomide) has emerged during the latest decade, but their use in routine clinical practice is not well documented as well as the cost of RRMM. OBJECTIVE: Our aim is to review the therapeutic management of such patients in France and to estimate the associated costs. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study, based on chart reviews, was conducted in French Haematology Departments over the period 2004-2007 and the associated direct costs estimated. RESULTS: One hundred and two patients with a relapse after first-line therapy were selected from five centres. The average follow-up from diagnosis or the date of first relapse to death or to the latest news was respectively 56.25 and 23.53 months. Novel agents were used in 73% of all cases, and in all cases of first relapse. Thalidomide and bortezomib were respectively the most frequently used second-line (57%) and third-line treatments (44%). The average number of lines of treatment received per patient as from first relapse was 2.75 (min 1; max 8) and the mean direct cost per month was estimated at 3130 € after the first relapse. This cost was represented in greater part by the cost of chemotherapy drugs (66%). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The use of novel agents such as thalidomide, bortezomib and lenalidomide for RRMM is highly prevalent in France from the first relapse. The associated medical cost is substantial mainly due to the cost of the new agents.

Impact of high-risk cytogenetics and prior therapy on outcomes in patients with advanced relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treated with lenalidomide plus dexaméthasone.

This retrospective analysis investigated the prognostic value of del(13) and t(4;14) abnormalities and the impact of prior treatment on outcomes in 207 heavily pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) treated with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone. Patients with relapsed or refractory MM who had either earlier received thalidomide or bortezomib, or for whom continuation of these agents was contraindicated, and who had fluorescence in situ hybridization data available were included in the analysis. Patients with relapsed or refractory MM who received treatment with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone in the presence of del(13) and t(4;14) chromosomal abnormalities had lower overall response rates (ORRs) and shorter median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with those who did not have these abnormalities. The results also showed that prior treatment with bortezomib was associated with shorter median PFS and OS. Progression during thalidomide therapy was the only significant independent predictor for OS and that the presence of del(13) and hemoglobin levels <10 g per 100 ml were prognostic factors for ORR and PFS, but not OS, in these heavily pretreated relapsed or refractory MM patients treated with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone.

Heterogeneity of t(4;14) in multiple myeloma. Long-term follow-up of 100 cases treated with tandem transplantation in IFM99 trials.

One hundred de novo multiple myeloma patients with t(4;14) treated with double intensive therapy according to IFM99 protocols were retrospectively analyzed. The median overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were 41.4 and 21 months, respectively, as compared to 65 and 37 for patients included in the IFM99 trials without t(4;14) (P<10(-7)). We identified a subgroup of patients presenting at diagnosis with both low beta(2)-microglobulin <4 mg/l and high hemoglobin (Hb) >/=10 g/l (46% of the cases) with a median OS of 54.6 months and a median EFS of 26 months, respectively, which benefits from high-dose therapy (HDT); conversely patients with one or both adverse prognostic factor (high beta(2)-microglobulin and/or low Hb) had a poor outcome. The achievement of either complete response or very good partial response after HDT was also a powerful independent prognostic factor for both OS and EFS.

[New treatment of multiple myeloma]. / Les nouveaux médicaments du myélome.

PURPOSE: After decades of minimal progress, two new classes of drugs with novels mechanisms of action: immunomodulatory drugs (thalidomide and lenalidomide) and proteasome inhibitors (bortezomib) have shown great activity for the treatment of multiple myeloma. CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS: Thalidomide acts by a variety of mechanisms; its efficacy is well known in disease relapse especially associated with dexamethasone. Recent results prove that combination of thalidomide with melphalan and prednisone should be considered as the first line standard of care in elderly patient. The main side effects are peripheral neuropathy and deep-vein thrombosis. Bortezomib is the first proteasome inhibitor. It is approved for the treatment in first disease relapse. The combination with glucocorticoids is synergistic. This combination in induction treatment before autologous stem cell transplantation is promising, as well as the combination with melphalan and prednisone in elderly patient. The main toxicities are fatigue and peripheral neuropathy. Lenalidomide is a structural analogue of thalidomide. Its efficacy in combination with dexamethasone has been proved in relapsing patients. The main toxicity is hematologic. Utilisation as first line treatment is also promising. FUTURE PROSPECTS AND PROJECTS: These three drugs have toxicities predictable and manageable and can be used successively or in combination for greater effectiveness. They have an impact on the multiple myeloma treatment strategies and on the disease course itself.

[Multifocal progressive leukoencephalitis in a patient given fludarabine for chronic lymphoid leukemia]. / Leucoencéphalopathie multifocale progressive après traitement par fludarabine dans une leucémie lymphoïde chronique.

A 74-year- man was hospitalized for subacute aphasia and right hemiparesis. He had had chronic lymphoid leukemia for 11 years and had been treated 5 months earlier with 3 courses of fludarabine. Magnetic resonance imaging showed lesions of the temporo-occipital white matter compatible with progressive multifocal leukoencephalitis (PML). The presence of JC virus was demonstrated first by in situ hybridation after a brain biopsy and second with polymerase chain reaction on CSF. The diagnosis of PML was confirmed. The causality of fludarabine treatment is discussed.

[Granulocyte sarcoma of the pancreas without extra-pancreatic location]. / Sarcome granulocytaire du pancréas sans autre localisation extra-pancréatique.

INTRODUCTION: Granulocyte sarcoma (GS), also known as chloroma, is a localized malignant tumor composed of myeloid cells, the diagnosis of which is difficult. The pancreatic location and recurrence, aside from any context of malignant hemopathy, are exceptional. OBSERVATION: A 31-year-old woman developed an isolated and recurrent granulocyte sarcoma of the pancreas, without any context of a malignant hemopathy. The diagnosis retained on extemporaneous examination was an adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, because of the non-specific necrotic nature of the tumor. The immuno-histochemical exploration corrected the diagnosis. Despite local surgery, an isolated tumor recurred 6 months later. This relapse was treated with radiotherapy followed by heavy chemotherapy, identical to that applied in acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML). Ten months later, remission was stable and complete. COMMENTS: Isolated granulocyte sarcomas located in the pancreas are exceptional and have often led to initial erroneous diagnosis. Immuno-histochemical methods are essential in order to obtain correct diagnosis. Despite the localized nature of the tumor, intensive AML-type chemotherapy is necessary.