ABSTRACT
The cerebral cortex comprises many distinct regions that differ in structure, function, and patterns of connectivity. Current approaches to parcellating these regions often take advantage of functional neuroimaging approaches that can identify regions involved in a particular process with reasonable spatial resolution. However, neuroanatomical biomarkers are also very useful in identifying distinct cortical regions either in addition to, or in place of functional measures. For example, differences in myelin density are thought to relate to functional differences between regions, are sensitive to individual patterns of experience, and have been shown to vary across functional hierarchies in a predictable manner. Accordingly, the current study provides quantitative stereological estimates of myelin density for each of the 13 regions that make up the feline auditory cortex. We demonstrate that significant differences can be observed between auditory cortical regions, with the highest myelin density observed in the regions that comprise the auditory core (i.e., the primary auditory cortex and anterior auditory field). Moreover, our myeloarchitectonic map suggests that myelin density varies in a hierarchical fashion that conforms to the traditional model of spatial organization in auditory cortex. Taken together, these results establish myelin as a useful biomarker for parcellating auditory cortical regions, and provide detailed estimates against which other, less invasive methods of quantifying cortical myelination may be compared.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Brain entropy is a measure of the complexity of brain activity that has been linked to various cognitive abilities. The measure is based on Shannon Entropy, a measure from Information Theory that quantifies the information capacity of a system from the probability distribution of its states. Most fMRI studies measure brain entropy at the voxel level as time-series entropy and assume that entropic time-series indicate complex large-scale spatiotemporal patterns of activity. NEW METHOD: We developed a novel measure of brain entropy called Activity-State Entropy. The method quantifies entropy based on underlying patterns of coactivation identified using Principal Components Analysis. These patterns, termed eigenactivity states, combine in time-varying proportions. RESULTS: We showed that Activity-State Entropy is sensitive to the complexity of the spatiotemporal patterns of activity in simulated fMRI data. We then applied this measure to real resting-state fMRI data and found that the eigenactivity states that explained the most variance in the data were comprised of large clusters of coactivating voxels, including clusters within Default Mode Network regions. More entropic brains were increasingly influenced by eigenactivity states comprised of smaller and more sparsely distributed clusters. COMPARISON TO EXISTING METHODS: We compared Activity-State Entropy to Sample Entropy and Dispersion Entropy, two time-series entropy measures commonly used in neuroimaging research, and found all three measures were positively correlated. CONCLUSIONS: Activity-State Entropy provides a measure of the spatiotemporal complexity of brain activity that complements time-series based measures of brain entropy.
