GPCR activation: a mutagenic spotlight on crystal structures.

The crystal structures of antagonist and agonist complexes of isolated ß(2) and ß(1) adrenoceptors have recently been supplemented by antagonist structures of M(2) and M(3) muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Importantly, a structure of an agonist-ligated ß(2) adrenoceptor complexed with its cognate G protein has provided the first view of a ternary complex representing the transition state in agonist-mediated G protein activation. This review interprets these G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) structures through the focus provided by extensive mutagenesis studies on muscarinic receptors, revealing an activation mechanism that is both modular and dynamic. Specific motifs, based around highly conserved residues, functionalise the seven-transmembrane architecture of these receptors. While exploiting conserved motifs, the ligand binding and signal transduction pathways work around and through water-containing cavities, an emerging feature of GPCR structures. These cavities may have undergone evolutionary selection to adapt GPCRs to particular signalling niches, and may provide targeting opportunities to enhance drug selectivity.

Helix 8 of the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor: scanning mutagenesis delineates a G protein recognition site.

We have used alanine-scanning mutagenesis followed by functional expression and molecular modeling to analyze the roles of the 14 residues, Asn422 to Cys435, C-terminal to transmembrane (TM) helix 7 of the M(1) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor. The results suggest that they form an eighth (H8) helix, associated with the cytoplasmic surface of the cell membrane in the active state of the receptor. We suggest that the amide side chain of Asn422 may act as a cap to the C terminus of TM7, stabilizing its junction with H8, whereas the side chain of Phe429 may restrict the relative movements of H8 and the C terminus of TM7 in the inactive ground state of the receptor. We have identified four residues, Phe425, Arg426, Thr428, and Leu432, which are important for G protein binding and signaling. These may form a docking site for the C-terminal helix of the G protein α subunit, and collaborate with G protein recognition residues elsewhere in the cytoplasmic domain of the receptor to form a coherent surface for G protein binding in the activated state of the receptor.

Ligand binding assays at equilibrium: validation and interpretation.

The focus of this review paper is factors affecting data interpretation in ligand binding assays under equilibrium conditions. Protocols for determining K(d) (the equilibrium dissociation constant) and K(dA) (the equilibrium inhibitor constant) for receptor ligands are discussed. The basic theory describing the interaction of a radiotracer and an unlabelled competitor ligand with a receptor is developed. Inappropriate experimental design may result in ligand depletion and non-attainment of equilibrium, distorting the calculation of K(d) and K(dA) . Strategies, both theoretical and practical, will be given to avoid and correct such errors, thus leading to the determination of reliable values for these constants. In determining K(dA) from competition binding studies, two additional concepts are discussed. First, the necessity to measure an adequate specific binding signal from the bound radiotracer ligand limits the range of affinity constants that can be measured: a particular set of assay conditions may lead to an upper limit on the apparent affinity of unlabelled ligands. Second, an extension of the basic assay methodology can indicate whether the interaction between the tracer and a test ligand is mediated by a competitive or an allosteric mechanism. Finally, the review ends with a discussion of two factors that are often overlooked: buffer composition and the temperature at which the assay is conducted, and the impact these can have on affinity measurements and the understanding of drug interactions.

Mutagenic mapping suggests a novel binding mode for selective agonists of M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.

Point mutations and molecular modeling have been used to study the activation of the M(1) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) by the functionally selective agonists 4-n-butyl-1-[4-(2-methylphenyl)-4-oxo-1-butyl]-piperidine (AC-42), and 1-[3-(4-butyl-1-piperidinyl)propyl]-3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-quinolinone (77-LH-28-1), comparing them with N-desmethylclozapine (NDMC) and acetylcholine (ACh). Unlike NDMC and ACh, the activities of AC-42 and 77-LH-28-1 were undiminished by mutations of Tyr404 and Cys407 (transmembrane helix 7), although they were reduced by mutations of Tyr408. Signaling by AC-42, 77-LH-28-1, and NDMC was reduced by L102A and abolished by D105E, suggesting that all three may interact with transmembrane helix 3 at or near the binding site Asp105 to activate the M(1) mAChR. In striking contrast to NDMC and ACh, the affinities of AC-42 and 77-LH-28-1 were increased 100-fold by W101A, and their signaling activities were abolished by Y82A. Tyr82 and Leu102 contact the indole ring of Trp101 in a structural model of the M(1) mAChR. We suggest the hypothesis that the side chain of Trp101 undergoes conformational isomerization, opening a novel binding site for the aromatic side chain of the AC-42 analogs. This may allow the positively charged piperidine nitrogen of the ligands to access the neighboring Asp105 carboxylate to activate signaling following a vector within the binding site that is distinct from that of acetylcholine. NDMC does not seem to use this mechanism. Subtype-specific differences in the free energy of rotation of the side chain and indole ring of Trp101 might underlie the M(1) selectivity of the AC-42 analogs. Tryptophan conformational isomerization may open up new avenues in selective muscarinic receptor drug design.

Roof and floor of the muscarinic binding pocket: variations in the binding modes of orthosteric ligands.

Alanine substitution mutagenesis has been used to investigate residues that make up the roof and floor of the muscarinic binding pocket and regulate ligand access. We mutated the amino acids in the second extracellular loop of the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor that are homologous to the cis-retinal contact residues in rhodopsin, the disulfide-bonded Cys178 and Cys98 that anchor the loop to transmembrane helix 3, the adjoining acidic residue Asp99, and the conserved aromatic residues Phe197 and Trp378 in the transmembrane domain. The effects on ligand binding, kinetics, and receptor function suggest that the second extracellular loop does not provide primary contacts for orthosteric ligands, including acetylcholine, but that it does contribute to microdomains that are important for the conformational changes that accompany receptor activation. Kinetic studies suggest that the disulfide bond between Cys98 and Cys178 may contribute to structures that regulate the access of positively charged ligands such as N-methyl scopolamine to the binding pocket. Asp99 may act as a gatekeeper residue to this channel. In contrast, the bulkier lipophilic ligand 3-quinuclidinyl benzilate may require breathing motions of the receptor to access the binding site. Trp378 is a key residue for receptor activation as well as binding, whereas Phe197 represents the floor of the N-methyl scopolamine binding pocket but does not interact with acetylcholine or 3-quinuclidinyl benzilate. Differences between the binding modes of N-methyl scopolamine, 3-quinuclidinyl benzilate, and acetylcholine have been modeled. Although the head groups of these ligands occupy overlapping volumes within the binding site, their side chains may follow significantly different directions.

Functional analysis of transmembrane domain 2 of the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor.

Ala substitution scanning mutagenesis has been used to probe the functional role of amino acids in transmembrane (TM) domain 2 of the M1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor, and of the highly conserved Asn43 in TM1. The mutation of Asn43, Asn61, and Leu64 caused an enhanced ACh affinity phenotype. Interpreted using a rhodopsin-based homology model, these results suggest the presence of a network of specific contacts between this group of residues and Pro415 and Tyr418 in the highly conserved NPXXY motif in TM7 that exhibit a similar mutagenic phenotype. These contacts may be rearranged or broken when ACh binds. D71A, like N414A, was devoid of signaling activity. We suggest that formation of a direct hydrogen bond between the highly conserved side chains of Asp71 and Asn414 may be a critical feature stabilizing the activated state of the M1 receptor. Mutation of Leu67, Ala70, and Ile74 also reduced the signaling efficacy of the ACh-receptor complex. The side chains of these residues are modeled as an extended surface that may help to orient and insulate the proposed hydrogen bond between Asp71 and Asn414. Mutation of Leu72, Gly75, and Met79 in the outer half of TM2 primarily reduced the expression of functional receptor binding sites. These residues may mediate contacts with TM1 and TM7 that are preserved throughout the receptor activation cycle. Thermal inactivation measurements confirmed that a reduction in structural stability followed the mutation of Met79 as well as Asp71.

Seven-transmembrane receptors: crystals clarify.

The X-ray structure of the photoreceptor rhodopsin has provided the first atomic-resolution structure of a seven-transmembrane (7-TM) G-protein-coupled receptor. This has provided an improved template for interpreting the huge body of structure--activity, mutagenesis and affinity labelling data available for related 7-TM receptors, such as muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Ligand contacts, and the intramolecular interactions that stabilize the ground state structure, can be identified with some degree of confidence. We now have a firm basis for attempts to predict the structure of the receptor--G-protein complex, and understand the mechanism by which the agonist--receptor complex activates the G protein.