Coronary artery bypass grafting with Y-saphenous vein grafts.

INTRODUCTION: The saphenous vein is one of the indispensible grafts for coronary revascularization despite the advantages of arterial grafts over veins. It can be used in different configurations with different anastomosis (eg, sequential, composite, or Y-graft) techniques. Our aim was to investigate early and midterm results of Y-type anastomosis of saphenous vein grafts for complete coronary revascularization. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with Y-graft technique was performed in 512 patients between February 1998 and June 2007. In total, 608 saphenous Y coronary anastomoses were performed. These anastomoses were on first and second obtuse marginal arteries (n: 323), first diagonal and first obtuse marginal arteries (n: 187), posterolateral and posterior descending artery (n: 79), and right coronary artery and posterior descending artery (n: 19). Endareterectomy was performed in 28 patients with severely calcified coronary arteries. Patients were evaluated for early and late survival, newly developing cardiac events, recurring angina, and reinterventions. RESULTS: In the early postoperative period, new myocardial infarction (MI) occurred in 27 (5.2%) patients and mortality in 13 (2.5%). Follow-up included the results of 487 (98%) patients. Mean follow-up duration was 56 +/- 24 months. Late mortality occurred in 36 (7.3%) patients, and in 13 (2.6%) patients new MI developed in the remote follow-up. Overall survival including all deaths at 3, 5, and 7 years was 94 +/- 0.6%, 86 +/- 1.3%, and 83 +/- 2.1%, respectively, and actuarial freedom from angina recurrence at 3, 5, and 7 years was 95.2 +/- 2.5%, 86.4 +/- 3%, and 84.7 +/- 4.6%, respectively. Among long-term survivors, 116 patients (25.7%), 49 being symptomatic, with 123 saphenous Y-type anastomoses having undergone angiography studies. Saphenous vein Y grafts were completely patent in 94 anastomoses (76.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Saphenous vein Y-type anastomosis technique can safely be used in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) with successful long-term outcomes. As with sequential anastomosis, the safety of the technique may be attributed to the distribution of inflow from aorta into multiple vessels.

Carotid and coronary artery occlusion in a patient with Takayasu arteritis.

Takayasu arteritis (TA) is a chronic inflammatory disease involving the aorta and its principal branches, leading to narrowing and occlusion of the vessels. Since the clinical manifestations depend on the location and severity of the lesions, stroke may be the initial presentation of the disease. Here we report the case of a young man with TA and complete thrombotic occlusion of the right common carotid artery who underwent surgical intervention at our institution. His postoperative computed tomography angiogram performed after 3 months revealed also total occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery from its proximal portion.

Is saphenofemoral junction reconstruction necessary during stripping of the saphenous vein?

BACKGROUND: Patients who had undergone complete ankle-to-groin stripping of the greater saphenous vein were evaluated retrospectively to assess the necessity of saphenofemoral junction reconstruction during the stripping procedure. Since 1996, in addition to the conventional complete stripping operation, we routinely perform a saphenofemoral junction reconstruction in patients presenting with greater saphenous vein reflux associated with low-grade (grades I-II) saphenofemoral junctional reflux. In this method, the size of the common femoral vein was adjusted to the desired diameter by a running linear suture technique after division of the greater saphenous vein. METHODS: Retrospective evaluation revealed that 73 limbs in 56 patients treated with this technique (group I). This group of patients was matched to another group of 65 patients (78 limbs) with similar characteristics and symptoms (group II) in whom the conventional complete ankle-to-groin stripping of greater saphenous vein was the treatment. The 2 groups were compared with respect to the incidence of complications, including recurrence of varicosities, ecchymosis, lymphocele, lymphorrhagia, wound infection, and paresthesia in the operated extremity. All patients also were evaluated by Doppler ultrasonography at 6 months, 12 months, and annually thereafter to determine the saphenofemoral junction reflux time (valve reflux time). The mean duration +/- SD of follow-up was 6.7 +/- 1.6 years (range, 2.1-10.8 years). RESULTS: Recurrence of varicosity was noted in 14 patients, 3 in group I and 11 in group II (P = .02). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of ecchymosis, hematoma, lymphocele, lymphorrhagia, wound infection, and paresthesia. At 6 months, a rapid decrease in valve reflux time was noted in group I (P = .0001). In addition, there was a significant improvement in valve reflux time at each subsequent Doppler examination in group I. Group II showed a decrease in valve reflux time, compared with the preoperative value (P = .068). During subsequent Doppler examinations, a decrease in valve reflux time also was noted in group II; this difference reached statistical significance only at 24 months (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: We believe that saphenofemoral junction reconstruction is a simple technique to perform and that addition of this method to the conventional stripping provides more durable results with a lesser incidence of recurrence. This method should be considered as a treatment modality in patients with greater saphenous vein reflux associated with low-grade (grades I-II) saphenofemoral junctional reflux.