Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
PLoS One ; 16(3): e0236770, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33711041

ABSTRACT

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is formed by brain capillary endothelial cells (BECs) supported by pericytes and astrocytes. The BBB maintains homeostasis and protects the brain against toxic substances circulating in the blood, meaning that only a few drugs can pass the BBB. Thus, for drug screening, understanding cell interactions, and pathology, in vitro BBB models have been developed using BECs from various animal sources. When comparing models of different species, differences exist especially in regards to the transendothelial electrical resistance (TEER). Thus, we compared primary mice, rat, and porcine BECs (mBECs, rBECs, and pBECs) cultured in mono- and co-culture with astrocytes, to identify species-dependent differences that could explain the variations in TEER and aid to the selection of models for future BBB studies. The BBB models based on primary mBECs, rBECs, and pBECs were evaluated and compared in regards to major BBB characteristics. The barrier integrity was evaluated by the expression of tight junction proteins and measurements of TEER and apparent permeability (Papp). Additionally, the cell size, the functionality of the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) efflux transporter, and the expression of the transferrin receptor were evaluated and compared. Expression and organization of tight junction proteins were in all three species influenced by co-culturing, supporting the findings, that TEER increases after co-culturing with astrocytes. All models had functional polarised P-gp efflux transporters and expressed the transferrin receptor. The most interesting discovery was that even though the pBECs had higher TEER than rBECs and mBECs, the Papp did not show the same variation between species, which could be explained by a significantly larger cell size of pBECs. In conclusion, our results imply that the choice of species for a given BBB study should be defined from its purpose, instead of aiming to reach the highest TEER, as the models studied here revealed similar BBB properties.


Subject(s)
Blood-Brain Barrier/metabolism , ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B/genetics , ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B/metabolism , Animals , Astrocytes/cytology , Astrocytes/metabolism , Cell Culture Techniques , Cell Size , Cells, Cultured , Endothelial Cells/cytology , Endothelial Cells/metabolism , Mice , Models, Biological , Permeability , Rats , Receptors, Transferrin/genetics , Receptors, Transferrin/metabolism , Swine , Tight Junction Proteins/genetics , Tight Junction Proteins/metabolism
2.
Exp Cell Res ; 379(1): 73-82, 2019 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30922921

ABSTRACT

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and malignant type of primary brain tumor and is characterized by its sudden onset and invasive growth into the brain parenchyma. The invasive tumor cells evade conventional treatments and are thought to be responsible for the ubiquitous tumor regrowth. Understanding the behavior of these invasive tumor cells and their response to therapeutic agents could help improve patient outcome. In this study, we present a GBM tumorsphere migration model with high biological complexity to study migrating GBM cells in a quantitative and qualitative manner. We demonstrated that the in vitro migration model could be used to investigate both inhibition and stimulation of cell migration with oxaliplatin and GBM-derived extracellular vesicles, respectively. The intercellular heterogeneity within the GBM tumorspheres was examined by immunofluorescent staining of nestin/vimentin and GFAP, which showed nestin and vimentin being highly expressed in the periphery of tumorspheres and GFAP mostly in cells in the tumorsphere core. We further showed that this phenotypic gradient was present in vivo after implanting dissociated GBM tumorspheres, with the cells migrating away from the tumor being nestin-positive and GFAP-negative. These results indicate that GBM tumorsphere migration models, such as the one presented here, could provide a more detailed insight into GBM cell biology and prove highly relevant as a pre-clinical platform for drug screening and assessing drug response in the treatment of GBM.


Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Cell Movement/physiology , Glioblastoma/pathology , Animals , Brain Neoplasms/metabolism , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Proliferation/physiology , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic/physiology , Glioblastoma/metabolism , Humans , Mice , Mice, Nude , Nestin/metabolism , Vimentin/metabolism
3.
Curr Pharm Des ; 22(35): 5487-5504, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27464719

ABSTRACT

This review presents the present-day literature on the anatomy and physiological mechanisms of the blood-brain barrier and the problematic of cerebral drug delivery in relation to malignant brain tumors. First step in treatment of malignant brain tumors is resection, but there is a high risk of single remnant infiltrative tumor cells in the outer zone of the brain tumor. These infiltrative single-cells will be supplied by capillaries with an intact BBB as opposed to the partly leaky BBB found in the tumor tissue before resection. Even though BBB penetrance of a chemotherapeutic agent is considered irrelevant though the limited success rate for chemotherapeutic treatability of GBM tumors indicate otherwise. Therefore drug delivery strategies to cerebral cancer after resection should be tailored to being able to both penetrate the intact BBB and target the cancer cells. In this review the intact bloodbrain barrier and cerebral cancer with main focus on glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is introduced. The GBM induced formation of a blood-tumor barrier and the consequences hereof is described and discussed with emphasis on the impact these changes of the BBB has on drug delivery to GBM. The most commonly used drug carriers for drug delivery to GBM is described and the current drug delivery strategies for glioblastoma multiforme including possible routes through the BBB and epitopes, which can be targeted on the GBM cells is outlined. Overall, this review aims to address targeted drug delivery in GBM treatment when taking the differing permeability of the BBB into consideration.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Drug Delivery Systems , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Antineoplastic Agents/chemistry , Blood-Brain Barrier/drug effects , Blood-Brain Barrier/pathology , Brain Neoplasms/pathology , Glioblastoma/pathology , Humans
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...