Pulmonary Artery Pseudoaneurysms: Clinical Features and CT Findings.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical and CT features of pulmonary artery pseudoaneurysms (PAPs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A database search of chest CT examinations performed from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2014 identified 24 patients with findings consistent with PAPs. A CT finding consistent with a PAP was defined as a focal saccular outpouching of a pulmonary artery. Medical records were reviewed to determine clinical presentations, treatments, and outcomes. CT scans were reviewed by two board-certified fellowship-trained chest radiologists. RESULTS: A total of 35 PAPs were identified in 24 patients. Hemoptysis and shortness of breath were the most common presenting symptoms. The most commonly identified causes of PAPs were infection (33%), neoplasms (13%), and trauma (17%). Of the 35 PAPs, 29 (83%) were located in segmental or subsegmental pulmonary arteries. A solitary PAP was identified in 20 (83%) patients, and multiple PAPs were identified in three patients with endocarditis and one patient with pulmonary metastases. Only three of 35 (9%) PAPs were associated with a ground-glass halo. Endovascular treatment was successfully performed in 12 patients, and only one patient had immediate recurrent hemoptysis after treatment. PAP was clinically suspected by the referring clinicians in only three patients. Sixteen of the 35 (46%) PAPs were not reported on the initial CT studies. CONCLUSION: PAPs showed a strong predilection for the peripheral pulmonary arteries. Multiplicity of PAPs can be seen in the settings of endocarditis and pulmonary metastatic disease. Most PAPs were not associated with a ground-glass halo. PAPs can be lethal but were often not suspected clinically and were underreported by radiologists.

To do or not to do: axillary nodal evaluation after ACOSOG Z0011 Trial.

Methods of axillary evaluation in invasive breast cancer continue to evolve. The recent American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 Trial is a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial that compared the survival and locoregional recurrence rates after complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) versus sentinel node biopsy (SNB) alone in women with a positive sentinel node in an effort to avoid the complications associated with ALND. As the results of this trial are implemented clinically, affecting surgical management of axillary metastatic disease, radiologists may need to redefine their role in the preoperative assessment of the axilla. Before the Z0011 trial, breast imagers worked to identify axillary metastases preoperatively, allowing appropriate patients to proceed directly to ALND and avoiding the need for SNB. However, the Z0011 trial concluded that ALND may not be necessary in women with metastatic axillary disease who meet the trial criteria. In the Z0011 trial, after 6 years of median follow-up there was no difference in either locoregional recurrence or survival among the women who underwent SNB alone compared with those who underwent ALND, suggesting that ALND is unnecessary in a subset of women with a positive node at SNB. These results raise questions about how aggressively radiologists should pursue percutaneous sampling of axillary nodes, as some practitioners conclude that, in an otherwise eligible woman, positive results from imaging-guided percutaneous biopsy preclude a Z0011 trial-directed pathway. Debate about the best way to implement the results of the Z0011 trial into daily clinical practice exists. It is important for breast imagers to work closely with breast surgeons to provide the most appropriate treatment course for each patient.

Percutaneous breast biopsy: effect on short-term quality of life.

PURPOSE: To examine the effects of percutaneous breast biopsy on short-term quality of life. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant prospective study. From December 1, 2007, through February 28, 2010, women undergoing percutaneous breast biopsy in an academic medical center were recruited to participate in a mixed-mode survey 2-4 days after biopsy. Patients described their biopsy experience by using the Testing Morbidities Index (TMI), a validated instrument for assessing short-term quality of life related to diagnostic testing. The scale ranged from 0 (worst possible experience) to 100 (no adverse effects). Seven attributes were assessed: pain or discomfort before and during testing, fear or anxiety before and during testing, embarrassment during testing, and physical and mental function after testing. Demographic and clinical information were also collected. Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to identify significant predictors of TMI score. RESULTS: In 188 women (mean age, 51.4 years; range, 22-80 years), the mean TMI score (±standard deviation) was 82 ± 12. Univariate analysis revealed age and race as significant predictors of the TMI score (P < .05). In the multivariate model, only patient age remained a significant independent predictor (P = .001). TMI scores decreased by approximately three points for every decade decrease in patient age, which suggests that younger women were more adversely affected by the biopsy experience. CONCLUSION: Younger patient age is a significant predictor of decreased short-term quality of life related to percutaneous breast biopsy procedures. Tailored prebiopsy counseling may better prepare women for percutaneous biopsy procedures and improve their experience.

Addition of tomosynthesis to conventional digital mammography: effect on image interpretation time of screening examinations.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of implementing a screening tomosynthesis program on real-world clinical performance by quantifying differences between interpretation times for conventional screening mammography and combined tomosynthesis and mammography for multiple participating radiologists with a wide range of experience in a large academic center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this HIPAA-compliant, institutional review board-approved study, 10 radiologists prospectively read images from screening digital mammography or screening combined tomosynthesis and mammography examinations for 1-hour-long uninterrupted sessions. Images from 3665 examinations (1502 combined and 2163 digital mammography) from July 2012 to January 2013 were interpreted in at least five sessions per radiologist per modality. The number of cases reported during each session was recorded for each reader. The experience level for each radiologist was also correlated to the average number of cases reported per hour. Analysis of variance was used to assess the number of studies interpreted per hour. A linear regression model was used to evaluate correlation between breast imaging experience and time taken to interpret images from both modalities. RESULTS: The mean number of studies interpreted in hour was 23.8 ± 0.55 (standard deviation) (range, 14.4-40.4) for combined tomosynthesis and mammography and 34.0 ± 0.55 (range, 20.4-54.3) for digital mammography alone. A mean of 10.2 fewer studies were interpreted per hour during combined tomosynthesis and mammography compared with digital mammography sessions (P < .0001). The mean interpretation time was 2.8 minutes ± 0.9 (range, 1.5-4.2 minutes) for combined tomosynthesis and mammography and 1.9 minutes ± 0.6 (range, 1.1-3.0) for digital mammography; interpretation time with combined tomosynthesis and mammography was 0.9 minute longer (47% longer) compared with digital mammography alone (P < .0001). With the increase in years of breast imaging experience, the overall additional time required to read images from combined tomosynthesis and mammography examinations decreased (R(2) = 0.52, P = .03). CONCLUSION: Addition of tomosynthesis to mammography results in increased time to interpret images from screening examinations compared with time to interpret images from conventional digital mammography alone.

Outcome of recommendations for radiographic follow-up of pneumonia on outpatient chest radiography.

OBJECTIVE: Follow-up chest radiographs are frequently recommended by radiologists to document the clearing of radiographically suspected pneumonia. However, the clinical utility of follow-up radiography is not well understood. The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence of important pulmonary pathology revealed during follow-up imaging of suspected pneumonia on outpatient chest radiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Reports of 29,138 outpatient chest radiography examinations performed at an academic medical center in 2008 were searched to identify cases in which the radiologist recommended follow-up chest radiography for presumed community-acquired pneumonia (n = 618). Descriptions of index radiographic abnormalities were recorded. Reports of follow-up imaging (radiography and CT) performed during the period from January 2008 to January 2010 were reviewed to assess the outcome of the index abnormality. Clinical history, demographics, microbiology, and pathology reports were reviewed and recorded. RESULTS: Compliance with follow-up imaging recommendations was 76.7%. In nine of 618 cases (1.5%), a newly diagnosed malignancy corresponded to the abnormality on chest radiography initially suspected to be pneumonia. In 23 of 618 cases (3.7%), an alternative nonmalignant disease corresponded with the abnormality on chest radiography initially suspected to be pneumonia. Therefore, in 32 of 618 patients (5.2%), significant new pulmonary diagnoses were established during follow-up imaging of suspected pneumonia. CONCLUSION: Follow-up imaging of radiographically suspected pneumonia leads to a small number of new diagnoses of malignancy and important nonmalignant diseases, which may alter patient management.

Radiographic follow-up of suspected pneumonia: survey of Society of Thoracic Radiology membership.

PURPOSE: To examine the current radiographic follow-up recommendations of thoracic radiologists after detection of a new opacity, suspected to be "pneumonia," on chest radiography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An anonymized, Institutional Review Board-approved, Internet-based survey was sent to the 735 members of the Society of Thoracic Radiology by e-mail. Questions focused on individual practices and institutional policies after radiographic detection of suspected pneumonia. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate for possible associations between recommendation practices and demographic variables, various clinical situations, and radiographic features. RESULTS: Of the 209 radiologists who responded, 42% "always" recommended follow-up radiographs for new opacities detected on chest radiographs, 55% "sometimes" recommended follow-up, and 2% "never" recommended follow-up. Univariate logistic regression analysis revealed that "years in practice" (P=0.0043) and "number of outpatient posterior-anterior and lateral chest radiographs interpreted per week" (P=0.027) were significant predictors of the recommendation practices. In addition, the multivariable logistic regression analysis pointed to the type of practice (academic vs. private) as an additional independent predictor of the recommendation practices (P=0.0294). The recommendations of those radiologists recommending follow-up "sometimes" were most often influenced by the radiographic appearance of the opacity and patient age. Only 4% reported an institutional policy. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of responding radiologists recommended follow-up on a case-by-case basis, influenced by multiple factors. Only a small minority reported a standardized practice at their institution. This lack of consistency demonstrates the need for a uniform, evidence-based approach.