A qualitative exploration of how midwives' and obstetricians' perception of risk affects care practices for low-risk women and normal birth.

BACKGROUND: Maternity care is facing increasing intervention and iatrogenic morbidity rates. This can be attributed, in part, to higher-risk maternity populations, but also to a risk culture in which birth is increasingly seen as abnormal. Technology and intervention are used to prevent perceived implication in adverse outcomes and litigation. QUESTION: Does midwives' and obstetricians' perception of risk affect care practices for normal birth and low-risk women in labour, taking into account different settings? METHODS: The research methods are developed within a qualitative framework. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews and analysed thematically. A purposive sample of 25 midwives and obstetricians were recruited from three maternity settings in Ireland. This included obstetric-led hospitals, an alongside midwifery-led unit and the community. FINDINGS: Midwifery is assuming a peripheral position with regard to normal birth as a progressive culture of risk and medicalisation affects the provision of maternity care. This is revealed in four themes; (1) professional autonomy and hierarchy in maternity care; (2) midwifery-led care as an undervalued and unsupported aspiration; (3) a shift in focus from striving for normality to risk management; and (4) viewing pregnancy through a 'risk-lens'. DISCUSSION: Factors connected to the increased medicalisation of birth contribute to the lack of midwifery responsibility for low-risk women and normal birth. Midwives are resigned to the current situation and as a profession are reluctant to take action. CONCLUSION: Improved models of care, distinct from medical jurisdiction, are required. Midwives must take responsibility for leading change as their professional identity is in jeopardy.

Midwives' and obstetricians' perceptions of risk and its impact on clinical practice and decision-making in labour: An integrative review.

BACKGROUND: Risk and risk assessment are increasingly affecting how maternity services are governed with rates of intervention continuing to rise in obstetric-led services for low-risk women. AIM: This review synthesises original research that examines how perceptions of risk impact on midwives' and obstetricians' facilitation of care for low-risk women in labour. METHODS: A five stage process for conducting integrative reviews was employed. A robust search strategy incorporated electronic searches in The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EBSCO, EMBASE and Scopus from 2009 to 2014. The initial search resulted in the retrieval of 2429 articles which were reduced to 14 through a systematic process. FINDINGS: The results of this review revealed an over-arching theme of an assumption of abnormality in the birthing process leading to unnecessary intervention and surveillance. Three sub-themes are presented under this central theme - (1) external influences on risk perception that include practice guidelines and professional responsibility; (2) influence of personal fears and values on risk perception focusing on differing attitudes to physiological birth; (3) impact of professionals' perceptions of risk on women's decision-making in labour. CONCLUSION: Practice is influenced by an assumption of birth as abnormal and is compounded by issues such as institutional risk management, lack of midwifery responsibility, fear of involvement in adverse outcomes and personal values regarding physiological birth. These findings suggest that a shift in focus away from risk and towards health and wellbeing in the planning of maternity care may go some way towards providing a solution to the increasing intervention rates for low-risk women.

The prevalence and pathological correlates of orthostatic hypotension and its subtypes when measured using beat-to-beat technology in a sample of older adults living in the community.

BACKGROUND: beat-to-beat technology is increasingly used for investigating orthostatic intolerance (OI) but the prevalence of orthostatic hypotension (OH) diagnosed with this technology is unclear. OBJECTIVES: (i) to use beat-to-beat technology to define the prevalence of OH, (ii) to investigate the pathological correlates of OH, (iii) to report the diversity of postural BP responses. METHODS: cross-sectional study of adults ≥ 65 years. BP responses to a 3-min head-up tilt were analysed. RESULTS: of 326 participants, 203(62.3%) were females. The median (IQR) age was 73 (70-78). One hundred and ninety-one (58.6%) met standard (20 mmHg systolic/10 mmHg diastolic) criteria for OH. The prevalence was higher in females (60.1% F versus 56.1% M); 47% were arteriolar subtype, 33% were venular, 9% were mixed and 11.0% could not be classified. Morphological analysis identified 102 subjects with 'small drop, overshoot', 131 with 'medium drop, slow recovery' and 31 with 'large drop, nonrecovery'. Those with OH had a lower BMI (P = 0.02), a higher resting heart rate (P = 0.005), were more likely to take a psychotropic (P = 0.02), have vertigo (P = 0.004) and report OI (P = 0.02). The 95th centile for the duration of systolic BP (SYSBP) decay >20 mmHg was 175 s and the slope of systolic BP decay was 4.75 mmHg/s. The 5th centile for percentage recovery of SYSBP was 81.4%. CONCLUSION: (i) beat-to-beat methods identify a higher prevalence of OH than sphygmomanometry, (ii) the pathological correlates of OH diagnosed in this manner are similar to those described for sphygmomanometry, (iii) there is a diverse pattern of orthostatic BP decay that could be used in future research to predict adverse outcomes in OH.