Survivorship of the fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: mean 14-year follow-up in a single medical center.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to report the long-term survival of fixed-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) with a mean of 14-year follow-up, and to determine possible risk factors of failure. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 337 fixed-bearing medial UKAs implanted between 2003 and 2014. Demographic and radiographic parameters were measured, including pre-operative and post-operative anatomical femorotibial angle (aFTA), posterior tibial slope (PTS), and anatomical medial proximal tibial angle (aMPTA). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied to figure out risk factors. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 14.0 years. There were 32 failures categorized into implant loosening (n = 11), osteoarthritis progression (n = 7), insert wear (n = 7), infection (n = 4), and periprosthetic fracture (n = 3). Cumulative survival was 91.6% at 10 years and 90.0% at 15 years. No statistically significant parameters were found between the overall survival and failure groups. Age and hypertension were significant factors of implant loosening with odds ratio (OR) 0.909 (p = 0.02) and 0.179 (p = 0.04) respectively. In the insert wear group, post-operative aFTA and correction of PTS showed significance with OR 0.363 (p = 0.02) and 0.415 (p = 0.03) respectively. Post-operative aMPTA was a significant factor of periprosthetic fracture with OR 0.680 (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The fixed-bearing medial UKA provides successful long-term survivorship. Tibial component loosening is the major cause of failure. Older age and hypertension were factors with decreased risk of implant loosening.

Older age and varus alignment lead to early failure in treating patellofemoral osteoarthritis with Fulkerson osteotomy.

Background: It is unclear the risk factors for the failure of modified Fulkerson osteotomy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 40 patients who underwent the modified Fulkerson osteotomy from 1998 to 2015. There were 4 males and 36 females. The mean age of the study group was 50.2 ± 11.2 years. We used standard anteriorization measuring 10-15 mm and medialization measuring 10 mm while maintaining an intact periosteal sleeve. Results: Both the patellofemoral angle and the congruence angle improved significantly after 5.9 years. Preoperatively, the mean preoperative Lysholm score was 56.12, and the Knee Society score was 60.52. At the final follow-up, these scores improved significantly to 88.75 and 86.49, respectively. However, eight patients (20%) underwent total knee arthroplasty in the follow-up period, five of whom underwent the operation within 5 years. Comparing the survival and non-survival groups, there was a significant difference of an older age in the TKA conversion group (survival: 48.3 ± 11.1; non-survival: 57.8 ± 8.7, p = 0.03). For knee alignment, the non-survival group had a mean valgus femorotibial angle of 1.8° ± 4.9° preoperatively, and the survival group had a mean valgus angle of 6.4° ± 4.5° (p = 0.03). Conclusions: we found that patients with older age and those with varus alignment have an increased risk of deteriorated medial femorotibial cartilage.

Using MRI Measurement to Improve Accuracy of Femoral Component Sizing in Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) can achieve better kinematics and faster recovery than total knee arthroplasty. The Phase III Oxford UKA system has five sizes of femoral components to approximate the normal knee geometry. However, these different sizes may also induce problems, such as the misselection of component size. Different criteria have been proposed to predict the ideal size preoperatively. However, no single method can be applied universally. Therefore, this study aimed to develop a preoperative measurement using knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to predict femoral component size. A total of 68 patients who underwent UKA were investigated from June 2019 to April 2020. 16 knees using a different MRI protocol were excluded. We developed an MRI measurement method to determine femoral size instead of gender- and height-based methods. The accuracy of different methods was compared using postoperative true lateral view radiographs. Three different kinds of gender- and height-based criteria, preoperative templating and intraoperative spoon measurement were compared. The accuracy of MRI measurement was 90.3%. Therefore, a significant difference was found between MRI measurements and all other methods, such as templating or gender- and height-based methods. In conclusion, the MRI measurement method can be concluded to accurately predict femoral component size in UKA. This method could be used regardless of different ethnic groups, individual knee geometry, or soft tissue tension.

Clinical Outcomes of Meniscus Repair with or without Multiple Intra-Articular Injections of Platelet Rich Plasma after Surgery.

Preservation of the meniscal volume is crucial in meniscus repair. The goal of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of repeated intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections after arthroscopic repair of a traumatic meniscal tear. We retrospectively reviewed 61 primary meniscal repairs in 61 patients (PRP group: 30; non-PRP: 31) from 2017 to 2018. Patients in the PRP group received repeated intra-articular PRP injections in week 2,4,6 after the primary meniscus repair. Subsequent meniscal repair treatment or meniscectomy, knee arthroplasty, and IKDC changes of less than 11.5 points were defined as healing failures. After following up for at least 24 months, the IKDC score was 75.1 ± 13.6, and the Lysholm score was 80.6 ± 14.9 in the PRP group and 72.6 ± 15.8 (IKDC) and 77.7 ± 17.2 (Lysholm) in the non-PRP group. Healing rates of the PRP and the non-PRP groups were 93.3% (Kaplan-Meier 91.6%) and 87.1% (Kaplan-Meier 84.7%), respectively (log rank test p = 0.874). Our study is the first to use multiple intra-articular PRP injections to facilitate meniscal healing after meniscal repair. Though selection bias may be present in this study, the PRP group had similar functional outcome and healing rate compared to non-PRP group.