Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging ; 11(11): 1625-1636, 2018 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29248657

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the effectiveness, efficiency, and safety of a tiered, comprehensive cardiac computed tomography (CT) protocol in comparison with functional testing. BACKGROUND: Although CT angiography accurately rules out coronary artery disease (CAD), incorporation of CT myocardial perfusion imaging as part of a tiered diagnostic approach could improve the clinical value and efficiency of cardiac CT in the diagnostic work-up of patients with angina pectoris. METHODS: Between July 2013 and November 2015, 268 patients (mean age 58 years; 49% female) with stable angina (mean pre-test probability 54%) were prospectively randomized between cardiac CT and standard guideline-directed functional testing (95% exercise electrocardiography). The tiered cardiac CT protocol included a calcium scan, followed by CT angiography if calcium was detected. Patients with ≥50% stenosis on CT angiography underwent CT myocardial perfusion imaging. RESULTS: By 6 months, the primary endpoint, the rate of invasive coronary angiograms without a European Society of Cardiology class I indication for revascularization, was lower in the CT group than in the functional testing group (2 of 130 [1.5%] vs. 10 of 138 [7.2%]; p = 0.035), whereas the proportion of invasive angiograms with a revascularization indication was higher (88% vs. 50%; p = 0.017). The median duration until the final diagnosis was 0 (0 of 0) days in the CT group and 0 (0 of 17) in the functional testing group (p < 0.001). Overall, 13% of patients randomized to CT required further testing, compared with 37% in the functional testing group (p < 0.001). The adverse event rate was similar (3% vs. 3%; p = 1.000), although the median cumulative radiation dose was higher for the CT group (3.1 mSv [interquartile range: 1.6 to 7.8] vs. 0 mSv [interquartile range: 0.0 to 7.1]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with suspected stable CAD, a tiered cardiac CT protocol with dynamic perfusion imaging offers a fast and efficient alternative to functional testing. (Comprehensive Cardiac CT Versus Exercise Testing in Suspected Coronary Artery Disease 2 [CRESCENT2]; NCT02291484).


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Circulation , Coronary Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Myocardial Perfusion Imaging/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Aged , Computed Tomography Angiography , Coronary Angiography , Coronary Artery Disease/physiopathology , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Coronary Stenosis/physiopathology , Coronary Stenosis/therapy , Coronary Vessels/physiopathology , Electrocardiography , Exercise Test , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Revascularization , Netherlands , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Severity of Illness Index
2.
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging ; 10(2)2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28174196

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cardiac computed tomography (CT) represents an alternative diagnostic strategy for women with suspected coronary artery disease, with potential benefits in terms of effectiveness and cost-efficiency. METHODS AND RESULTS: The CRESCENT trial (Calcium Imaging and Selective CT Angiography in Comparison to Functional Testing for Suspected Coronary Artery Disease) prospectively randomized 350 patients with stable angina (55% women; aged 55±10 years), mostly with an intermediate coronary artery disease probability, between cardiac CT and functional testing. The tiered cardiac CT protocol included a calcium scan followed by CT angiography if the Agatston calcium score was between 1 and 400. Patients with test-specific contraindications were not excluded from study participation. Sex differences were studied as a prespecified subanalysis. Enrolled women presented more frequently with atypical chest pain and had a lower pretest probability of coronary artery disease compared with men. Independently of these differences, cardiac CT led in both sexes to a fast final diagnosis when compared with functional testing, although the effect was larger in women (P interaction=0.01). The reduced need for further testing after CT, compared with functional testing, was most evident in women (P interaction=0.009). However, no sex interaction was observed with respect to changes in angina and quality of life, cumulative diagnostic costs, and applied radiation dose (all P interactions≥0.097). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac CT is more efficient in women than in men in terms of time to reach the final diagnosis and downstream testing. However, overall clinical outcome showed no significant difference between women and men after 1 year. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01393028.


Subject(s)
Angina, Stable/etiology , Computed Tomography Angiography/statistics & numerical data , Coronary Angiography/statistics & numerical data , Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Coronary Vessels/diagnostic imaging , Healthcare Disparities , Vascular Calcification/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Coronary Angiography/methods , Coronary Artery Disease/complications , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure , Reproducibility of Results , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Factors , Time Factors , Vascular Calcification/complications
3.
Eur Heart J ; 37(15): 1232-43, 2016 Apr 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26746631

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To compare the effectiveness and safety of a cardiac computed tomography (CT) algorithm with functional testing in patients with symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease (CAD). METHODS AND RESULTS: Between April 2011 and July 2013, 350 patients with stable angina, referred to the outpatient clinic of four Dutch hospitals, were prospectively randomized between cardiac CT and functional testing (2 : 1 ratio). The tiered cardiac CT protocol included a calcium scan followed by CT angiography if the Agatston calcium score was between 1 and 400. Patients with test-specific contraindications were not excluded from study participation. By 1 year, fewer patients randomized to cardiac CT reported anginal complaints (P = 0.012). The cumulative radiation dose was slightly higher in the CT group (6.6 ± 8.7 vs. 6.1 ± 9.3 mSv; P < 0.0001). After 1.2 years, event-free survival was 96.7% for patients randomized to CT and 89.8% for patients randomized to functional testing (P = 0.011). After CT, the final diagnosis was established sooner (P < 0.0001), and additional downstream testing was required less frequently (25 vs. 53%, P < 0.0001), resulting in lower cumulative diagnostic costs (€369 vs. €440; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: For patients with suspected stable CAD, a tiered cardiac CT protocol offers an effective and safe alternative to functional testing. Incorporating the calcium scan into the diagnostic workup was safe and lowered diagnostic expenses and radiation exposure.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging , Vascular Calcification/diagnostic imaging , Computed Tomography Angiography/methods , Coronary Artery Disease/physiopathology , Coronary Artery Disease/therapy , Electrocardiography , Exercise Test/methods , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Revascularization/statistics & numerical data , Radiation Dosage , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Calcification/physiopathology , Vascular Calcification/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...