Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 78(12): 2849-2858, 2023 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37864515

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Treatment of slowly growing non-tuberculous mycobacteria (SGM) is challenging. In vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is needed to optimize a multidrug regimen but requires weeks to result. Aggregated AST patterns, or an antibiogram, of SGM would be helpful to providers. OBJECTIVES: We aggregated and analysed human SGM isolates sent to our laboratory from across the USA between 2018 and 2022 to describe their in vitro susceptibility patterns and construct an antibiogram. METHODS: SGM isolates' species/subspecies and mutations in rrs or rrl were identified by a line probe assay. AST was done primarily by broth microdilution and interpreted using the latest CLSI guideline. Mutational and AST results for SGM with ≥15 isolates were collated and analysed with descriptive statistics. RESULTS: There were 32 different species/subspecies of SGM from 10 131 isolates between January 2018 and December 2022 from across the USA, 80% of which were from organisms in Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC). Most specimens were sputum and came from Florida (2892). MAC ranged from 94% to 100% susceptible to clarithromycin, 64% to 91% to amikacin, 2% to 31% to linezolid, and 4% to 41% to moxifloxacin. Non-MAC SGM ranged from 82% to 100% susceptible to clarithromycin, 49% to 100% to amikacin, and 76% to 100% to rifabutin, but susceptibilities to other antimicrobials varied widely. WT rrs and rrl predicted >96% of phenotypic non-resistance to amikacin and clarithromycin, respectively, whereas mutant genotypes predicted >90% of phenotypic resistance. CONCLUSIONS: Most SGM are likely to be susceptible to clarithromycin and amikacin, complementing their treatment guidance by mycobacterial experts. Molecular identification of resistant genotypes is accurate and helpful. This antibiogram for SGM will help providers.


Subject(s)
Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous , Nontuberculous Mycobacteria , Humans , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Clarithromycin/therapeutic use , Amikacin , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous/microbiology , Mycobacterium avium Complex , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Drug Resistance, Bacterial
2.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 105(3): 115882, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36610383

ABSTRACT

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing for rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM) is uncommon or only performed in large reference laboratories. Here we developed a cumulative antibiogram for 14 RGM using the largest sample size to date (N = 3860). All RGM showed 82% to 100% susceptibility to amikacin. Mycobacterium abscessus showed low percentages of susceptibility to most antimicrobials; of antimicrobials without interpretations, the minimum inhibitory concentration-90 for clofazimine was low (≤0.5mg/L). All three subspecies had ≤2.6% rrl resistance mutations, however intact erm(41) was detected in 70% to100% of M. abscessus abscessus and bolletii. Mycobacterium chelonae had a similar susceptibility pattern to M. abscessus subsp. massiliense and Mycobacterium immunogenum except that it was susceptible to tobramycin (87%). Mycobacterium fortuitum complex and similar organisms showed higher frequency of susceptibility to fluoroquinolones, beta-lactams, linezolid, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Although relatively small published RGM antibiograms showed substantial variance, a comprehensive antibiogram can help influence treatment and monitoring patterns of resistance.


Subject(s)
Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous , Mycobacterium , Humans , United States , Nontuberculous Mycobacteria/genetics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Mycobacterium Infections, Nontuberculous/microbiology , Amikacin , Microbial Sensitivity Tests
3.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 27(11): 2836-2846, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34670648

ABSTRACT

Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) species constitute most mycobacteria infections in persons with cystic fibrosis (CF) in the United States, but little is known about their genomic diversity or transmission. During 2016-2020, we performed whole-genome sequencing on 364 MAC isolates from 186 persons with CF from 42 cystic fibrosis care centers (CFCCs) across 23 states. We compared isolate genomes to identify instances of shared strains between persons with CF. Among persons with multiple isolates sequenced, 15/56 (27%) had >1 MAC strain type. Genomic comparisons revealed 18 clusters of highly similar isolates; 8 of these clusters had patients who shared CFCCs, which included 27/186 (15%) persons with CF. We provide genomic evidence of highly similar MAC strains shared among patients at the same CFCCs. Polyclonal infections and high genetic similarity between MAC isolates are consistent with multiple modes of acquisition for persons with CF to acquire MAC infections.


Subject(s)
Cystic Fibrosis , Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare Infection , Cystic Fibrosis/complications , Cystic Fibrosis/epidemiology , Genomics , Humans , Metagenomics , Mycobacterium avium Complex/genetics , Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare Infection/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...