Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 11 de 11
Filter
1.
J Nurs Adm ; 53(1): 57-62, 2023 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36542444

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the differences in effectiveness between nurse educator-led and clinical coach-led intensive care unit (ICU) training programs for new graduate nurses. BACKGROUND: New graduate ICU nurses require substantial clinical training, which is often provided by peers serving as clinical coaches who have not been formally trained for an educator role. Our medical center successfully transitioned from a nurse educator-led to clinical coach-led model for initial ICU education after formally training the clinical coaches. METHODS: Nurses enrolled in nurse educator-led (n = 114) or clinical coach-led (n = 166) ICU clinical training programs were compared on program pass rate, satisfaction, preparedness, turnover, and competence. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups on any of the identified measures of program effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Both educator-led and clinical coach-led models, with appropriate training, effectively prepared ICU nurses in this setting. Implementing a clinical coaching model for ICU training of new graduate nurses could assuage common resource issues, such as a shortage of nurse educators, as well as address the increasing demand for well-trained ICU nurses.


Subject(s)
Education, Nursing, Graduate , Humans , Faculty, Nursing , Intensive Care Units , Program Evaluation , Critical Care
3.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 37(5): 512-8, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26856378

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether surgical teams with greater stability among their members (ie, members have worked together more in the past) experience lower rates of sharps-related percutaneous blood and body fluid exposures (BBFE) during surgical procedures. DESIGN: A 10-year retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A single large academic teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Surgical teams participating in surgical procedures (n=333,073) performed during 2001-2010 and 2,113 reported percutaneous BBFE were analyzed. METHODS: A social network measure (referred to as the team stability index) was used to quantify the extent to which surgical team members worked together in the previous 6 months. Poisson regression was used to examine the effect of team stability on the risk of BBFE while controlling for procedure characteristics and accounting for procedure duration. Separate regression models were generated for percutaneous BBFE involving suture needles and those involving other surgical devices. RESULTS The team stability index was associated with the risk of percutaneous BBFE (adjusted rate ratio, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.88-0.97]). However, the association was stronger for percutaneous BBFE involving devices other than suture needles (adjusted rate ratio, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.85-0.99]) than for exposures involving suture needles (0.96 [0.88-1.04]). CONCLUSIONS: Greater team stability may reduce the risk of percutaneous BBFE during surgical procedures, particularly for exposures involving devices other than suture needles. Additional research should be conducted on the basis of primary data gathered specifically to measure qualities of relationships among surgical team personnel.


Subject(s)
Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Needlestick Injuries/epidemiology , Occupational Injuries/epidemiology , Operating Rooms , Personnel, Hospital , Blood-Borne Pathogens , Body Fluids , Hospitals, Teaching , Humans , North Carolina , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Workforce
4.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 37(1): 80-7, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26434696

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE To use a unique multicomponent administrative data set assembled at a large academic teaching hospital to examine the risk of percutaneous blood and body fluid (BBF) exposures occurring in operating rooms. DESIGN A 10-year retrospective cohort design. SETTING A single large academic teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS All surgical procedures (n=333,073) performed in 2001-2010 as well as 2,113 reported BBF exposures were analyzed. METHODS Crude exposure rates were calculated; Poisson regression was used to analyze risk factors and account for procedure duration. BBF exposures involving suture needles were examined separately from those involving other device types to examine possible differences in risk factors. RESULTS The overall rate of reported BBF exposures was 6.3 per 1,000 surgical procedures (2.9 per 1,000 surgical hours). BBF exposure rates increased with estimated patient blood loss (17.7 exposures per 1,000 procedures with 501-1,000 cc blood loss and 26.4 exposures per 1,000 procedures with >1,000 cc blood loss), number of personnel working in the surgical field during the procedure (34.4 exposures per 1,000 procedures having ≥15 personnel ever in the field), and procedure duration (14.3 exposures per 1,000 procedures lasting 4 to <6 hours, 27.1 exposures per 1,000 procedures lasting ≥6 hours). Regression results showed associations were generally stronger for suture needle-related exposures. CONCLUSIONS Results largely support other studies found in the literature. However, additional research should investigate differences in risk factors for BBF exposures associated with suture needles and those associated with all other device types. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2015;37(1):80-87.


Subject(s)
Blood Loss, Surgical , Body Fluids , Needlestick Injuries/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Occupational Injuries/epidemiology , Blood Volume , General Surgery/statistics & numerical data , Humans , North Carolina/epidemiology , Operating Rooms , Operative Time , Orthopedics/statistics & numerical data , Personnel, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Surgical Equipment/statistics & numerical data
5.
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract ; 27(3): 124-30, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25044820

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Nurse practitioners (NPs) are in a prime position to educate women about initial signs and symptoms of ovarian cancer (OC) and perform appropriate screening tests. However, little is known about NPs knowledge regarding OC. This article's purpose is to present the outcomes of a focused OC awareness program for NP students. DATA SOURCES: NP students (N = 104) participated in this longitudinal one group pre-post study. Knowledge was calculated based on the number of correct answers for a total knowledge score and subscales related to OC incidence, risk, screening, symptoms, and treatment. An item related to the effectiveness of the Pap test to screen for OC was evaluated separately. CONCLUSION: Knowledge deficits continue to exist related to OC, emphasizing the need for NPs to be aware of risk factors, symptoms, and early detection options for women with average risk. Many NP students erroneously believed a Pap test was an effective screening tool for OC. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Many NPs are inadequately prepared to assess risk, detect early symptoms, and perform screening tests for OC. Continuing education and reinforcement about OC is essential if NPs are to provide appropriate education to clients and detect this deadly disease as early as possible.


Subject(s)
Nurse Practitioners/education , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Papanicolaou Test/standards , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Nurse's Role , Ovarian Neoplasms/prevention & control , Papanicolaou Test/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
J Interprof Care ; 28(1): 40-4, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24010772

ABSTRACT

Healthcare reform has led to an increased emphasis on interprofessional healthcare models for older adults. Unfortunately, best practice education that focuses on the interprofessional healthcare of the elderly does not yet exist. As a prelude to implementing interprofessional geriatric educational initiatives, we developed a survey to identify potential attitudinal differences among graduate healthcare students regarding personal aging, caring for older adults, healthcare reform and the role of the physician on the interprofessional team. We surveyed third-year medical students, nurse practitioner students and graduate social work students. Attitudes regarding personal aging were similar among the professions. Nurse practitioner and social work students had higher positive attitudes toward the care of older adults. Concerns about the impact of healthcare reform on quality and healthcare costs differed significantly. There was also a significant difference in attitudes concerning the role of the physician as the leader of the interprofessional team. These results provide insights into gerontologic-focused attitudes of graduate healthcare professional students. In an era of dramatic healthcare change, these findings will assist educators in the development and implementation of educational programs to prepare graduate students for the interprofessional care of elderly patients.


Subject(s)
Aging , Attitude of Health Personnel , Cooperative Behavior , Health Care Reform , Students, Health Occupations/psychology , Adult , Aged , Female , Geriatrics , Humans , Interdisciplinary Studies , Male , Patient Care Team , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
7.
J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv ; 49(4): 28-33, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21410087

ABSTRACT

It is estimated that more than a half million people in the United States are living with young-onset dementia and another half million with mild cognitive impairment, a precursor of dementia. Relatively little has been written about the psychosocial needs of these people, but information can be extrapolated from the literature on dementia in older adults and the developmental tasks and roles of middle age. This article synthesizes this literature and provides information to help psychiatric nurses and other health care professionals better understand individuals living with young-onset dementia.


Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease/nursing , Autoimmune Diseases/nursing , Cognition Disorders/nursing , Dementia, Vascular/nursing , Frontotemporal Dementia/nursing , Age Factors , Aged , Alzheimer Disease/diagnosis , Autoimmune Diseases/diagnosis , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Dementia, Vascular/diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Frontotemporal Dementia/diagnosis , Humans , Middle Aged , Needs Assessment , Nursing Assessment
9.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 29(12): 1139-48, 2008 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18991506

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The risk of percutaneous blood and body fluid (BBF) exposures in operating rooms was analyzed with regard to various properties of surgical procedures. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A single university hospital. METHODS: All surgical procedures performed during the period 2001-2002 (n=60,583) were included in the analysis. Administrative data were linked to allow examination of 389 BBF exposures. Stratified exposure rates were calculated; Poisson regression was used to analyze risk factors. Risk of percutaneous BBF exposure was examined separately for events involving suture needles and events involving other device types. RESULTS: Operating room personnel reported 6.4 BBF exposures per 1,000 surgical procedures (2.6 exposures per 1,000 surgical hours). Exposure rates increased with an increase in estimated blood loss (17.5 exposures per 1,000 procedures with 501-1,000 cc blood loss and 22.5 exposures per 1,000 procedures with >1,000 cc blood loss), increased number of personnel ever working in the surgical field (20.5 exposures per 1,000 procedures with 15 or more personnel ever in the field), and increased surgical procedure duration (13.7 exposures per 1,000 procedures that lasted 4-6 hours, 24.0 exposures per 1,000 procedures that lasted 6 hours or more). Associations were generally stronger for suture needle-related exposures. CONCLUSIONS: Our results support the need for prevention programs that are targeted to mitigate the risks for BBF exposure posed by high blood loss during surgery (eg, use of blunt suture needles and a neutral zone for passing surgical equipment) and prolonged duration of surgery (eg, double gloving to defend against the risk of glove perforation associated with long surgery). Further investigation is needed to understand the risks posed by lengthy surgical procedures.


Subject(s)
Body Fluids , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Needlestick Injuries/epidemiology , Operating Rooms/statistics & numerical data , Risk Assessment , Cohort Studies , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Humans , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/statistics & numerical data , North Carolina/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Personnel, Hospital , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors
11.
Am J Ind Med ; 46(6): 637-48, 2004 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15551378

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Health care workers (HCWs) are at risk of exposures to human blood and body fluids (BBF). Needlestick injuries and splashes place HCWs at risk for numerous blood-borne infections including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B (HBV), and hepatitis C (HCV). Utilizing a new comprehensive occupational health surveillance system, the objective of this research was to better define the BBF exposure risk and risk factors among employees of a large tertiary medical center. METHODS: A population of 24,425 HCWs employed in jobs with potential BBF exposures was followed for BBF exposure events from 1998 to 2002. BBF exposure rates were calculated for strata defined by age, race, gender, occupation, work location, and duration of employment. Poisson regression was used for detailed analyses of risk factors for BBF exposure. RESULTS: The study population reported 2,730 BBF exposures during the study period, resulting in an overall annual rate of 5.5 events/100 FTEs and a rate of 3.9 for percutaneous exposures. Higher rates were observed for males, persons employed less than 4 years, Hispanic employees, and persons less than 45 years of age. Much higher rates were observed for house staff, nurse anesthetists, inpatient nurses, phlebotomists, and surgical/operating room technicians. Poisson regression results strengthened and extended results from stratified analyses. Rates of percutaneous exposures from hollow needles were found to decrease over the study period; however, exposure rates from suture needles appear to be increasing. CONCLUSION: While continued training efforts need to be directed toward new HCWs, our data also suggest that employees who have been in their job 1-4 years continue to be at higher risk of BBF exposures. This research also points to the need for better safety devices/products and work practices to reduce suture-related injuries.


Subject(s)
Blood-Borne Pathogens , Body Fluids/microbiology , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/statistics & numerical data , Needlestick Injuries/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/analysis , Occupational Health , Adult , Age Distribution , Female , Health Surveys , Humans , Incidence , Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional/prevention & control , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Probability , Risk Assessment , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...