Psychometric evaluation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (Fact/GOG-Ntx) questionnaire for patients receiving systemic chemotherapy.

The purpose of this study was to validate the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx) questionnaire. The FACT/GOG-Ntx is the FACT-G plus an eleven-item subscale (Ntx subscale) that evaluates symptoms and concerns associated specifically with chemotherapy-induced neuropathy. Two groups of women with ovarian cancer completed the FACT/GOG-Ntx: one group with known neurotoxicities and one group of chemotherapy-naive women newly diagnosed with ovarian cancer. Levels of patient neuropathy, severity of toxicity, and patient quality of life from diagnosis of ovarian cancer to 12 months post-diagnosis were assessed. The Ntx subscale significantly differentiated the two groups at baseline and 3- and 6-month follow-ups, demonstrating significantly fewer problems among chemotherapy-naive patients than among patients with known neuropathy. The FACT/GOG-Ntx is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing the impact of neuropathy on health-related quality of life. The Ntx subscale demonstrated sensitivity to meaningful clinical distinctions and change over time.

Prevalence and burden of overactive bladder in the United States.

CONTEXT: the National Overactive BLadder Evaluation (NOBLE) Program was initiated to better understand the prevalence and burden of overactive bladder in a broad spectrum of the United States population. OBJECTIVE: to estimate the prevalence of overactive bladder with and without urge incontinence in the US, assess variation in prevalence by sex and other factors, and measure individual burden. DESIGN: US national telephone survey using a clinically validated interview and a follow-up nested study comparing overactive bladder cases to sex- and age-matched controls. SETTING: noninstitutionalized US adult population. PARTICIPANTS: a sample of 5,204 adults >/=18 years of age and representative of the US population by sex, age, and geographical region. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: prevalence of overactive bladder with and without urge incontinence and risk factors for overactive bladder in the US. In the nested case-control study, SF-36, CES-D, and MOS sleep scores were used to assess impact. RESULTS: the overall prevalence of overactive bladder was similar between men (16.0%) and women (16.9%), but sex-specific prevalence differed substantially by severity of symptoms. In women, prevalence of urge incontinence increased with age from 2.0% to 19% with a marked increase after 44 years of age, and in men, increased with age from 0.3% to 8.9% with a marked increase after 64 years of age. Across all age groups, overactive bladder without urge incontinence was more common in men than in women. Overactive bladder with and without urge incontinence was associated with clinically and significantly lower SF-36 quality-of-life scores, higher CES-D depression scores, and poorer quality of sleep than matched controls. CONCLUSIONS: the NOBLE studies do not support the commonly held notion that women are considerably more likely than men to have urgency-related bladder control problems. The overall prevalence of overactive bladder does not differ by sex; however, the severity and nature of symptom expression does differ. Sex-specific anatomic differences may increase the probability that overactive bladder is expressed as urge incontinence among women compared with men. Nonetheless, overactive bladder, with and without incontinence, has a clinically significant impact on quality-of-life, quality-of-sleep, and mental health, in both men and women.

Coping strategies and health care-seeking behavior in a US national sample of adults with symptoms suggestive of overactive bladder.

BACKGROUND: Although millions of individuals have symptoms suggestive of overactive bladder (OAB), few ever seek or receive medical treatment for their condition. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe coping strategies and health care-seeking behavior in a community-based sample of adults with symptoms suggestive of OAB. METHODS: A cross-sectional household telephone survey of an age- and sex-stratified sample of adults was conducted. The survey consisted of general health-related questions as well as questions related to OAB symptoms. A total of 4896 adults completed the interview Respondents were considered to have OAB if they reported > or = 1 symptom of urinary urgency, frequency, or urge incontinence. A follow-up questionnaire was then mailed to a subsample of the telephone interview respondents. The mailed questionnaire contained questions related to type and severity of OAB symptoms, coping strategies, medical care/treatment, feelings/beliefs about OAB, and quality of life. Half of the phone respondents with urinary incontinence (n = 638) and a random sample of all other phone respondents received the mailed questionnaire (n = 873); 1,034 questionnaires were returned. RESULTS: Of the respondents with OAB, 69.6% tried > or = 1 nonmedical coping strategy. Respondents with incontinent OAB were significantly more likely than those with continent OAB or those with no OAB (controls) to use nonmedical coping strategies (incontinent OAB, 76.1%; continent OAB, 59.0%; controls, 31.9%; P < 0.001). Fewer than half of the respondents with OAB (43.5%) had spoken with a provider about OAB in the previous 12 months. Medical consultation was associated with sex, type and severity of OAB, number of nonmedical coping strategies tried, number of OAB information sources consulted, inclination to try new OAB medications, and feelings/beliefs about OAB. In 90% of patient-provider discussions about OAB, the patient initiated the topic. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals manage symptoms suggestive of OAB primarily by using nonmedical coping strategies rather than consulting health care providers. Results of this study support the need for improved clinical recognition of OAB and increased patient-provider communication about this condition.

Health-related quality of life among adults with symptoms of overactive bladder: results from a U.S. community-based survey.

OBJECTIVES: To assess, by means of a survey, the impact of the symptoms of overactive bladder (urinary frequency, urgency, and urge incontinence) on the quality of life in a community-based sample of the U.S. population. METHODS: A telephone survey was conducted in the United States among an age and sex-stratified sample of 4896 noninstitutionalized adults 18 years of age and older. From the responses to the telephone survey, a total of 483 individuals with symptoms of overactive bladder and 191 controls completed a mailed follow-up questionnaire to assess their quality of life using the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 20. RESULTS: After adjustment for age, sex, and the use of medical care, the greatest differences in the quality-of-life scores between the patients with incontinent overactive bladders and the controls were in the health perception (17.6 points; P <0.001) and role functioning (13.0 points; P <0.001) scales. Those with an overactive bladder with the symptoms of frequency or urgency, or both, but without incontinence, also had significantly lower scores than did the controls in mental health (P = 0.026), health perception (P = 0.01), and bodily pain (P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that individuals with an overactive bladder experience decrements in their quality of life relative to community controls. An important new finding from this study is that individuals with an overactive bladder, even without demonstrable urine loss, also have a poorer quality of life than that of controls.

The effect of rofecoxib on the pharmacodynamics and pharmcokinetics of warfarin.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to examine the effect of 3 doses of rofecoxib (12.5, 25, and 50 mg) on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of warfarin. METHODS: Two single-dose (12.5 or 50 mg of rofecoxib with 25 mg or 30 mg of oral warfarin, respectively, on day 7 of each period) trials (N = 12 men) and 1 steady-state warfarin trial (25 mg rofecoxib; N = 15, 13 men and 2 women) were completed as two-period, randomized, balanced, crossover, double-blind designs. The prothrombin time international normalized ratio (INR) and S(-) and R(+) warfarin enantiomers were assessed during 144 hours after the single warfarin doses. In the steady-state warfarin trial, after the attainment of a stable INR (1.4-1.7), the stable warfarin dose was co-administered with rofecoxib (25 mg) and placebo over two 21-day periods. After the dose of warfarin on day 21, INR and S(-) and R(+) warfarin were assessed during 24 hours. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, rofecoxib slightly increased the INR by approximately 5% (90% confidence interval on the geometric ratio, 1.03, 1.08) and 11% (1.04, 1.19) for the two single-dose warfarin trials with 12.5 and 50 mg of rofecoxib, respectively. In the steady-state warfarin study with 25 mg of rofecoxib, the INR was increased by 8% (1.02, 1.15). Rofecoxib had no significant effect (versus placebo) on the pharmacokinetics of S(-) warfarin. However, in the 3 studies, treatment with 12.5, 25, and 50 mg of rofecoxib was associated with a 27%, 38%, and 40% increase in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of the biologically less active R(+) warfarin. CONCLUSIONS: Rofecoxib increased plasma concentrations of the biologically less active R(+) warfarin, which accounted for a small increase in INR. The approximately 8% increase in INR at steady state with warfarin co-administered with 25 mg of rofecoxib is not likely to be clinically important in most patients taking warfarin. However, standard monitoring of INR values should be conducted when therapy with rofecoxib is initiated or changed, particularly in the first few days, for patients receiving warfarin.

Absence of pharmacokinetic interaction between orally co-administered naproxen sodium and diphenhydramine hydrochloride.

The potential for a pharmacokinetic interaction between naproxen and diphenhydramine was examined in a randomized three-way crossover design with a 1-week washout between dosing. Single oral doses of 220 mg of naproxen sodium and 50 mg of diphenhydramine hydrochloride were given separately and together to 30 healthy male and female subjects. Heparinized blood samples obtained for 48 h postdose were assayed for plasma naproxen and diphenhydramine concentrations using validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and gas chromatography (GC) assay methods, respectively. The area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), maximum plasma concentrations (C(max)), time of C(max) (T(max)) and terminal exponential half-life (t(1/2,z)), were analysed for significant treatment differences by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Based on absence of significant treatment effects on AUC and C(max), single-dose oral co-administration of 220 mg of naproxen sodium with 50 mg of diphenhydramine hydrochloride does not alter the pharmacokinetics of either naproxen or diphenhydramine. Significant treatment differences seen for naproxen T(max) (0.3 h, males only) and diphenhydramine t(1/2,z) (0.8 h, females only) were minor and are unlikely to have therapeutic consequences. Thus, efficacy and safety of concomitant naproxen and diphenhydramine should not be altered due to a pharmacokinetic interaction.

Celecoxib, a specific COX-2 inhibitor, has no significant effect on methotrexate pharmacokinetics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of celecoxib, a specific inhibitor of cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) on the renal clearance and plasma pharmacokinetic profile of stable methotrexate (MTX) doses in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Fourteen adult female patients with RA taking a stable weekly dose of MTX (5 to 15 mg/wk) for a minimum of 3 months were randomized to receive concomitantly either celecoxib (200 mg BID) or placebo for a period of 7 days in a single blind, 2 period crossover study of MTX pharmacokinetics and renal clearance. RESULTS: The plasma pharmacokinetic profile of MTX did not change significantly when celecoxib or a placebo was coadministered. The mean renal clearance of MTX alone, 7.98+/-2.18 l/h, was virtually unchanged by coadministration of celecoxib (7.94+/-1.61 l/h) or placebo (7.97+/-1.19 l/h). CONCLUSION: Celecoxib has no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics or renal clearance of MTX in patients with RA, although these results should be confirmed in prospective studies of elderly and renally impaired patients.

Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of single intravenous infusions of an adenosine agonist, AMP 579, in healthy male volunteers.

The pharmacokinetics of an adenosine agonist, AMP 579, following intravenous administration were evaluated. Single AMP 579 doses of 20 to 150 micrograms/kg were infused intravenously over 6 hours using a constant-rate or two-step rate of infusion to healthy male volunteers. Plasma and urine samples were collected for measurement of AMP 579 concentration using a validated HPLC assay. An assessment of safety and tolerability was also performed. Based on a noncompartmental method of analysis, the pharmacokinetics of AMP 579 were characterized by rapid systemic clearance (0.77 to 0.85 L/h/kg), a moderate steady-state volume of distribution (0.80 to 0.94 L/kg), and a short terminal elimination half-life (0.84 to 1.13 h). AMP 579 exhibited dose (infusion rate)-proportional pharmacokinetics over the dose range. In addition, little or no unchanged AMP 579 was found in the urine. The primary cardiovascular pharmacodynamic response that was observed was a dose-related increase in mean ventricular heart rate. Fifteen minutes prior to the end of the infusion, volunteers administered the highest dose (150 micrograms/kg) exhibited a mean (range) 59% (36%-69%) increase in heart rate as compared to a mean (range) 18% (0%-73%) increase for the placebo group. No clinically relevant changes in the systolic or diastolic blood pressure were observed. The information obtained in this study should allow the design of AMP 579 dosage regimens that would maximize plasma AMP 579 concentrations and minimize the incidence of adverse events.

Effects of food on the pharmacokinetics of sparfloxacin.

Sparfloxacin, a fluoroquinolone with a broad antimicrobial spectrum and long elimination half-life, is indicated for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia and acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis in adult patients. The present study was undertaken to determine the effects of skim milk and a high-fat breakfast without milk on the single-dose pharmacokinetic characteristics of this antibiotic. The pharmacokinetics of a single 200-mg dose of sparfloxacin were assessed in a 3-way crossover study that included 23 healthy male volunteers who had fasted, had ingested 240 mL of skim milk, or had consumed a standard high-fat breakfast. The subjects' mean age and weight were 26.5 years and 73.2 kg, respectively; 17 were white, 5 Hispanic, and 1 black. Neither skim milk nor the high-fat breakfast had a statistically significant effect on sparfloxacin absorption, as reflected in the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). Ninety percent confidence limits for logarithmically transformed AUC from time zero to infinity and Cmax were within the 80% to 125% range, demonstrating that the rate and extent of sparfloxacin absorption with skim milk or a high-fat breakfast were not different from those under fasted conditions. As indicated by an increase in the time to Cmax from 3.6 to 5.4 hours, the high-fat breakfast slightly delayed the onset of sparfloxacin absorption. Skim milk and the high-fat breakfast did not significantly affect the elimination kinetics of sparfloxacin. Sparfloxacin was well tolerated in all 3 treatment groups. Despite the apparent delay in the onset of absorption, the bioavailability of sparfloxacin in the healthy male subjects in this study population was not affected by concomitant administration with skim milk or a high-fat meal. Accordingly, the results suggest that sparfloxacin can be administered without regard to the ingestion of milk or meals.

Pharmacokinetic interaction of sparfloxacin and digoxin.

Sparfloxacin, a broad-spectrum, oral fluoroquinolone antimicrobial agent, has a long elimination half-life that permits once-daily administration. Antibiotics may increase the oral bioavailability of digoxin, leading to increases in its plasma concentration. Since patients treated with sparfloxacin may be receiving concurrent treatment with digoxin, the possibility of an interaction between sparfloxacin and digoxin was examined in a double-masked, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose, two-way crossover study in 24 healthy male volunteers between 20 and 49 years of age. All subjects were given digoxin 0.3 mg once daily throughout the 20-day study. Sparfloxacin (or placebo) was given as a 400-mg loading dose on day 1, followed by single 200-mg daily doses for 9 days, with crossover to the alternate treatment on days 11 through 20. Plasma levels of digoxin were analyzed by validated radioimmunoassay, and plasma levels of sparfloxacin were analyzed by validated high-performance liquid chromatography. Concomitant administration of sparfloxacin and digoxin was generally well tolerated. Mean values for steady-state area under the concentration-time curve over 24 hours for the 2 treatments were virtually identical: 28.4 ng/h per mL(-1) for digoxin administered with placebo and 28.9 ng/h per mL(-1) for digoxin administered concomitantly with sparfloxacin. Mean steady-state maximum plasma concentrations were 3.91 and 3.59 ng/mL for digoxin with placebo and digoxin with sparfloxacin, respectively. Mean steady-state trough plasma digoxin concentrations for the 2 treatments were 0.87 and 0.89 ng/mL, respectively. Mean times to steady-state maximum plasma concentrations were identical at 0.89 hours for both treatments. Mean steady-state oral clearance was 10.6 L/h for digoxin alone and 10.4 L/h for digoxin with sparfloxacin. Thus administration of sparfloxacin in combination with digoxin did not alter the pharmacokinetics of digoxin in healthy male volunteers aged 20 to 49 years. Steady-state plasma sparfloxacin concentrations were consistent with those obtained in other multiple-dose phase I studies, suggesting that digoxin does not alter the steady-state pharmacokinetics of sparfloxacin.

Effect of infusion rate on the pharmacokinetics and tolerance of intravenous dolasetron mesylate.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of dolasetron mesylate and its active metabolite hydrodolasetron when dolasetron mesylate was administered intravenously at increasing infusion rates. DESIGN: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. METHODS: Forty-nine healthy nonsmoking male volunteers were randomly assigned to receive intravenous doses of dolasetron mesylate 100 mg or placebo. Three groups of 16 subjects each (12 dolasetron mesylate, 4 placebo) received escalating infusion rates (50, 100, then 200 mg/min). Physical examinations, vital signs, laboratory tests, and adverse events were recorded before and after administration of the study drug. Serial blood samples and 12-lead electrocardiogram measurements were obtained for 24 hours after the infusion. Plasma samples were analyzed for dolasetron and hydrodolasetron. RESULTS: Dolasetron mesylate was well tolerated, with no apparent differences in vital signs or adverse event profiles among the different rates of infusion. In general, the pharmacokinetics of dolasetron and hydrodolasetron were superimposable among the three infusion rate groups. Plasma dolasetron concentrations declined rapidly in all three infusion rate groups, with mean elimination half-life (t1/2) of less than 10 minutes. The reduced metabolite hydrodolasetron, which accounts for most pharmacologic activity, formed rapidly, with maximum concentrations occurring between 0.4 and 0.5 hours and disappeared with a mean t1/2 of 8-9 hours. The correlation coefficients of least-squares regression analysis between the pharmacokinetic parameters and the infusion rate of dolasetron were less than 0.083 and the slopes were not significantly different from 0, suggesting that none of the hydrodolasetron pharmacokinetic parameters were affected by rate of infusion. CONCLUSIONS: The intravenous administration of dolasetron 100 mg over 0.5-2 minutes did not significantly alter the pharmacokinetic profiles of either dolasetron or hydrodolasetron. In addition, the safety profile of dolasetron did not change with increasing rate of infusion. Therefore, the rate of infusion of dolasetron mesylate appears to have no pharmacokinetic or clinical implications when assessed over a 0.5-2-minute time period.

Effect of montelukast on single-dose theophylline pharmacokinetics.

The effect of montelukast (MK-0476), a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist in development for treatment of asthma, on single-dose theophylline plasma concentrations was studied in three separate clinical trials. Montelukast was evaluated at 10 mg once daily (the clinical dosage), 200 mg once daily, and 600 mg (200 mg three times daily). At the clinical dosage, montelukast did not change single-dose theophylline plasma concentration in a clinically important manner. The geometric mean ratios for theophylline area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC0-->infinity ) (0.92) and maximal plasma concentration (Cmax ) (1.04) were well within the predefined and generally accepted bioequivalence range of 0.80 and 1.25. Montelukast decreased theophylline Cmax by 12% and 10%, AUC0-->infinity by 43% and 44%, and elimination half-time by 44% and 39% at 200 mg/d (oral and intravenous, respectively), and at 600 mg/d, montelukast decreased theophylline Cmax by 25%, AUC0-->infinity by 66%, and elimination half-time by 63%. These results show that montelukast at the clinical dosage did not change theophylline pharmacokinetics in a clinically important manner, but at 20- to 60-fold higher dosages, montelukast significantly reduced the theophylline pharmacokinetics parameters; an apparent dosage dependence is suggested.

Multiple-dose, placebo-controlled, phase I study of oral dolasetron.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of increasing dose levels of oral dolasetron mesylate, a new 5-HT3 antagonist. DESIGN: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging phase I study. SETTING: A clinical research center. PATIENTS: Forty healthy male volunteers. INTERVENTIONS: Eight subjects at each dose level were randomized in a ratio of 3:1 to receive either dolasetron mesylate 25, 50, 100, 150, or 200 mg in a single oral dose on days 1 and 9, and twice/day on days 2-8, or placebo for 9 days. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Dolasetron was well tolerated at all dose levels. The adverse event rates for dolasetron- and placebo-treated subjects who experienced at least one adverse event were 80% and 50%, respectively. Most frequently reported by subjects receiving dolasetron were headache, constipation, flatulence, and lightheadedness. They generally were mild, and none was severe. No dose-response relationship was apparent for any adverse event. There were no clinically significant changes in mean laboratory values or vital signs. Asymptomatic treatment-related electrocardiographic changes were consistent with the drug's electrophysiologic properties. These changes have been well characterized and have thus far been clinically unimportant. Pharmacokinetics of the reduced metabolite were dose independent, and multiple-dose exposure of this metabolite can be predicted from its single-dose values. CONCLUSION: Oral dolasetron mesylate was well tolerated when administered in doses up to 200 mg/day for 9 days in healthy volunteers.

Safe coadministration of terbinafine and terfenadine: a placebo-controlled crossover study of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions in healthy volunteers.

The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions of terbinafine (Lamisil) and terfenadine (Seldane) were assessed in 26 healthy volunteers randomized to receive either terbinafine (250 mg tablet) or its placebo (terbinafine placebo), which were administered in a double-blind manner once daily for 18 days. On days 12 through 18, terfenadine was coadministered (60 mg twice daily, unblinded). Pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained for terbinafine and its desmethyl metabolite on day 11 (in the absence of terfenadine), day 12, and day 18. Terfenadine and terfenadine acid metabolite levels were also assayed on days 12 and 18. After a 4-week washout period, subjects were crossed over to the alternate treatment (terbinafine or terbinafine placebo). Pharmacodynamic measures were electrocardiographic (ECG) rhythm abnormalities, corrected QT interval (QTc), and plasma ALT levels. Terfenadine levels were evaluated; however, only eight of 1502 samples assayed were above the limit of quantitation. No effect of terbinafine administration on pharmacokinetic parameters for the terfenadine acid metabolite was observed, except for a decrease of approximately 20% in through terbinafine concentrations (C0hr; p < 0.05) on the last day of terfenadine plus terbinafine coadministration. Pharmacokinetic parameters for terbinafine were unchanged on the first day of terfenadine coadministration, and only small increases in area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from 0 to 24 hours and peak plasma concentrations (16.1%[p < 0.01] and 6.63% [p < 0.05]) were observed on the last day of terfenadine and terbinafine coadministration. Values for C0hr were also about 20% to 25% higher (p < 0.05). Steady-state levels of the terfenadine acid metabolite were achieved after 2 days of terfenadine coadministration, and steady-state levels of terbinafine and its desmethyl metabolite were achieved after 14 days of terbinafine administration. The incidence of ECG rhythm abnormalities was not significantly higher in any treatment group; however, the incidence of prolongation of QTc > 10% above baseline was significantly higher in the groups treated with terfenadine. No QTc prolongation occurred in the absence of terfenadine treatment. Both terbinafine and terfenadine were well tolerated when coadministered during this study, as indicated by the low incidence of complaints, abnormalities, and adverse events. The results of this study indicate that terbinafine and terfenadine can be safely coadministered.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging safety evaluation of single-dose intravenous dolasetron in healthy male volunteers.

The safety and tolerability of dolasetron mesylate, a potent and selective 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, were evaluated after single intravenous doses in healthy male volunteers. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, phase I study, 80 subjects received either placebo or dolasetron in escalating doses (0.6 to 5.0 mg/k). Subjects were monitored for adverse events, vital sign and laboratory alterations, and changes in electrocardiographic (ECG) intervals and electroencephalographic (EEG) patterns. Overall, the percentage of subjects reporting adverse events was similar in those receiving dolasetron (44/64; 68.8%) or placebo (10/16; 62.5%); most adverse events were mild in severity. Subjects receiving dolasetron reported a higher incidence of central nervous system (headache and dizziness/lightheadedness), gastrointestinal (increased appetite and nausea), and visual adverse events and taste alterations. No clinically significant changes in laboratory variables were observed. Transient and asymptomatic ECG changes (small mean increases in PR interval and QRS complex duration versus baseline) were noted in several subjects at 1 to 2 hours after infusion at doses > or = 3.0 mg/kg. Transient, mild blood pressure decreases were observed in five subjects, including one on placebo. Dolastron mesylate was well tolerated in single intravenous doses up to 5.0 mg/kg in healthy male volunteers. Clinical studies of the drug are ongoing for antiemetic indications.

Effect of the acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase inhibitor DuP 128 on cholesterol absorption and serum cholesterol in humans.

Intestinal cholesterol esterification by the enzyme acyl-CoA:cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT) is a presumed prerequisite for cholesterol absorption. We evaluated the effect of a potent, poorly absorbed ACAT inhibitor (DuP 128: N'-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-N-[5-(4,5-diphenyl-1H-imidazol-2-ylthio)pe ntyl]- N-heptylurea) on cholesterol absorption in a randomized trial. Thirty subjects received DuP 128 for 7 weeks, 10 each at 900 mg per day, 1800 mg per day, and 3600 mg per day; six subjects received placebo; and nine subjects received 1 gm neomycin twice a day. Cholesterol absorption determinations used a continuous dual isotope 14C-cholesterol and 3H-beta sitosterol method. DuP 128 (pooled doses) induced at 14.4% +/- 11.4% reduction in cholesterol absorption (p < 0.05 versus placebo): 17.6% +/- 8.4% at 900 mg, 9.1% +/- 11.4% at 1800 mg, and 17.1% +/- 12.9% at 3600 mg. Neomycin induced a 26.4% +/- 10.7% reduction (p < 0.01). After 6 weeks, neomycin reduced serum total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 22.4% +/- 9.2% and 24.0% +/- 11.6%, respectively (p < 0.01 versus placebo). DuP 128 induced reductions of 3.9% +/- 11% (difference not significant) and 4.95% +/- 14.3% (p = 0.05). ACAT inhibitors limit cholesterol absorption in humans; however, the magnitude of the effect, as exemplified by DuP 128, is small.

Bioequivalence of verapamil hydrochloride extended-release pellet-filled capsules when opened and sprinkled on food and when swallowed intact.

A study was performed to determine whether verapamil hydrochloride administered in extended-release pellet-filled capsules is bioequivalent to the same formulation administered by sprinkling the contents of the capsules onto food. Thirty-two healthy subjects participated in the randomized, two-way crossover study. In treatment A, the subjects swallowed the contents of a verapamil hydrochloride extended-release pellet-filled capsule, 240 mg, that had been sprinkled on applesauce. In treatment B, the subjects swallowed the same type of capsule intact. Blood samples were drawn at baseline, every hour for 10 hours, and at 12, 15, 24, 30, 36, and 48 hours after each dose administration. The plasma was analyzed for verapamil and norverapamil by high-performance liquid chromatography. The following calculations were performed: AUC0-48, AUC0-infinity, Cmax, tmax, and k. Results for the two treatments were compared by analysis of variance. There were no significant differences between the AUC0-48, AUC0-infinity, Cmax, tmax, and k for the two methods of dose administration. For verapamil the differences for all variables were less than 5%, and for norverapamil the differences were less than 4% for all variables except tmax (9.5%). The 90% confidence intervals were within acceptable limits for all variables except the norverapamil tmax comparison. Sprinkling the contents of extended-release pellet-filled capsules onto food provides verapamil hydrochloride that is bioequivalent to that obtained from the intact capsules.

Comparison of the pharmacokinetic profiles of two oral controlled-release morphine formulations in healthy young adults.

The pharmacokinetic profiles of two oral controlled-release morphine formulations, MS Contin tablets and Roxanol SR tablets, were compared to evaluate their bioequivalence. In a sequential, crossover study, 18 healthy young male volunteers received single 60-mg doses (two 30-mg tablets) of each formulation and provided 15 serial blood samples over 24 hours, which were assayed to determine their morphine concentrations by high-performance liquid chromatography. Analysis of variance revealed significant differences between the treatments for maximum plasma concentration (P less than 0.001), area under the plasma concentration curve from zero to 12 hours (P less than 0.01), and apparent elimination half-life (P less than 0.001). No significant differences were found for time required to reach maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to 24 hours. The results show that the two morphine preparations are not bioequivalent.