ABSTRACT
Verheij syndrome (VRJS) is a rare craniofacial spliceosomopathy presenting with craniofacial dysmorphism, multiple congenital anomalies and variable neurodevelopmental delay. It is caused by single nucleotide variants (SNVs) in PUF60 or interstitial deletions of the 8q24.3 region. PUF60 encodes a splicing factor which forms part of the spliceosome. To date, 36 patients with a sole diagnosis of VRJS due to disease-causing PUF60 SNVs have been reported in peer-reviewed publications. Although the depth of their phenotyping has varied greatly, they exhibit marked phenotypic heterogeneity. We report 10 additional unrelated patients, including the first described patients of Khmer, Indian, and Vietnamese ethnicities, and the eldest patient to date, with 10 heterozygous PUF60 variants identified through exome sequencing, 8 previously unreported. All patients underwent deep phenotyping identifying variable dysmorphism, growth delay, neurodevelopmental delay, and multiple congenital anomalies, including several unique features. The eldest patient is the only reported individual with a germline variant and neither neurodevelopmental delay nor intellectual disability. In combining these detailed phenotypic data with that of previously reported patients (n = 46), we further refine the known frequencies of features associated with VRJS. These include neurodevelopmental delay/intellectual disability (98%), axial skeletal anomalies (74%), appendicular skeletal anomalies (73%), oral anomalies (68%), short stature (66%), cardiac anomalies (63%), brain malformations (48%), hearing loss (46%), microcephaly (41%), colobomata (38%), and other ocular anomalies (65%). This case series, incorporating three patients from previously unreported ethnic backgrounds, further delineates the broad pleiotropy and mutational spectrum of PUF60 pathogenic variants.
Subject(s)
Abnormalities, Multiple , Intellectual Disability , Microcephaly , RNA Splicing Factors , Repressor Proteins , Humans , Abnormalities, Multiple/diagnosis , Abnormalities, Multiple/genetics , Intellectual Disability/diagnosis , Intellectual Disability/genetics , Microcephaly/diagnosis , Microcephaly/genetics , Phenotype , Repressor Proteins/genetics , RNA Splicing Factors/genetics , Spliceosomes/genetics , Spliceosomes/pathologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Clinical genetics is an evolving specialty impacted by the availability of increasingly sophisticated investigational technologies. Methods for monitoring the changes in workload and workflow are necessary to ensure adequate service resourcing. METHODS: A literature search of known workload and workflow studies was completed, identifying metrics of value. A framework of metrics to allow consistent capture in clinical genetics practice was developed. This framework was then applied to local general genetics service data to evaluate recent changes in service delivery. RESULTS: Literature regarding service delivery metrics in clinical genetics services is limited and inconsistent in application. The metric framework generated is a useful tool for consistent and ongoing evaluation of general genetics services. Through application of the framework, new service delivery trends and significant changes in workload were identified. CONCLUSION: Studies of clinical genetics service delivery suffer from the use of inconsistent metrics. This framework will allow for monitoring of changes to service delivery, caseload volume, caseload complexity, and workforce over time. Local data presented demonstrate the significant effect that implementing clinical genomic sequencing has had on clinical service delivery. Applying this framework produces a comprehensive service characterization, enabling funding bodies to justify resourcing that addresses the growing demand of clinical genetics.
