ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether depressive symptoms in older adults are associated with an increased risk for hospitalization. DESIGN: A 6 month cohort study. SETTING: Five counties in the northern Piedmont of North Carolina from the Duke University site of the Established Populations for Epidemiological Studies of the Elderly project. PARTICIPANTS: The sample included 3486 community-dwelling adults, aged 65 and older. MEASUREMENTS: Crude risk ratios for the effect of depressive symptoms on 6 month risk for hospitalization were calculated, followed by a multivariable analysis controlling for demographics and health status. RESULTS: Three hundred participants were hospitalized during the 6 month follow-up period. The crude risk ratio for the effect of depressive symptoms on hospitalization was 1.95 (95% CI = 1.47-2.58). Subgroup analysis showed significant positive risk ratios for men aged 65 to 74 and > or =75, and women aged 65 to 74. After a multivariable analysis, however, these associations remained significant only among men > or =75 (RR = 3.43; 95% CI = 1.33-8.86). CONCLUSIONS: Depressive symptoms were independently associated with a more than threefold increased risk for hospitalization among men aged > or =75. This result reflects differences in the effects of depressive symptoms across age and gender groups, and emphasizes that symptoms of depression influence overall health and medical utilization among, at the very least, the oldest subset of men.
Subject(s)
Aged/psychology , Depression/psychology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Age Distribution , Aged/statistics & numerical data , Aged, 80 and over , Depression/diagnosis , Female , Health Status , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Multivariate Analysis , North Carolina , Odds Ratio , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex DistributionABSTRACT
This article describes a three-year effort to facilitate the development of a university health maintenance organization (HMO) into an effective clinical teaching site for the team practice of primary care. Project staff initiated several activities to promote team development in the HMO. These included review and development of algorithms to guide physician/nurse teams in the care of patients with common problems, workshops on communication and role negotiating skills, and preceptor training. A variety of objective and subjective methods were employed to assess HMO team development and the effectiveness of the HMO as a primary care teaching site. Initial resistance to both team practice and teaching have been overcome. Students who were trained in the project not only acquired good clinical skills but also, perhaps more importantly, developed skills in professional role negotiation and communication as well.
Subject(s)
Education, Medical , Education, Nursing , Health Maintenance Organizations/organization & administration , Primary Health Care , District of Columbia , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Patient Care Team , PreceptorshipABSTRACT
Key research in the area of quality assessment is reviewed and a method for periodic assessment in primary care organizations is proposed. The suggested approach is designed for administrative, rather than research, purposes. Therefore, it focuses on indicators that are both practical and realistic for use in periodic monitoring. The proposed method is two-staged and includes both technical performance (curing) and satisfaction (caring). At the first level of evaluation, general areas of performance are examined; these are key performance indicators in prevention, diagnosis, and management of illness, and questionnaires dealing with the accessibility and acceptability of care, coupled with objective measures of satisfaction. Those areas of performance that are not up to management standards are then examined in greater detail at the second level of evaluation. Using this approach, organizations can build a longitudinal picture of performance and chart their progress annually.
