Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Pers Assess ; 76(3): 421-47, 2001 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11499456

ABSTRACT

We adapted self-report measures of attachment style to the psychological assessment of women in specialized inpatient treatment for trauma-related disorders. The study employed 2 measures of adult attachment style, the Relationship Questionnaire (Bartholomew & Horowitz, 1991) and the Adult Attachment Scale (Collins & Read, 1990) as well as our Current Attachment Relationships questionnaire, which assesses the extent of social support in secure attachments. We administered these measures to 99 patients and to a convenience sample of 154 women in the community. We found modest correspondence between the 2 attachment style measures and substantial relations between attachment styles and range of secure attachment relationships. Women in the trauma sample reported insecure attachment styles and relatively few secure attachment figures. We discuss the implications of these findings for clinical assessment.


Subject(s)
Inpatients/psychology , Interpersonal Relations , Object Attachment , Social Support , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Case-Control Studies , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Psychometrics , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology
2.
Bull Menninger Clin ; 63(3): 429-42, 1999.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10452200

ABSTRACT

The authors developed the Trauma History Screen to screen for potentially traumatic events in women admitted for specialized treatment of trauma-related disorders. The questionnaire contains 14 items assessing commonly occurring traumas, and respondents indicate the frequency with which they have experienced the traumas as well as the age at which the trauma occurred. Six items pertaining to interpersonal trauma form an internally consistent subscale. The authors present normative data for a sample of 102 traumatized patients as well as correlations with scores from the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, the Impact of Event Scale, and the Dissociative Experiences Scale. The findings provide some indication of convergent validity for the Trauma History Screen, and the authors recommend using the questionnaire to alert clinicians to trauma that should be explored more fully in the context of a clinical relationship.


Subject(s)
Life Change Events , Medical History Taking , Patient Admission , Personality Inventory/statistics & numerical data , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/therapy
3.
J Pers Assess ; 73(3): 449-71, 1999 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10689654

ABSTRACT

Herman's (1992a) clinical formulation of complex posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) captures the extensive diagnostic comorbidity seen in patients with a history of repeated interpersonal trauma and severe psychiatric disorders. Yet the sheer breadth of symptoms and personality disturbance encompassed by complex PTSD limits its descriptive usefulness. This study employed cluster analysis of the MCMI-III (Millon, 1994) personality disorder scales to determine whether there is meaningful heterogeneity within a group of 227 severely traumatized women who were treated in a specialized inpatient program. The analysis distinguishes 5 clinically meaningful clusters, which we label alienated, withdrawn, aggressive, suffering, and adaptive. The study examined differences among these 5 personality disorder clusters on the MCMI-III clinical syndrome scales, as well as on the Brief Symptom Inventory (Derogatis, 1993), Dissociative Experiences Scale (E. M. Bernstein & Putnam, 1986), Adult Attachment Scale (Collins & Read, 1990), and Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (D.P. Bernstein, 1995). We present a classification-tree method for determining the cluster membership of new cases and discuss the implications of the findings for diagnostic assessment, treatment, and research.


Subject(s)
Personality Disorders/diagnosis , Personality Inventory , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/complications , Adult , Cluster Analysis , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Predictive Value of Tests , Psychometrics/statistics & numerical data , Severity of Illness Index , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/rehabilitation
4.
Psychol Rep ; 83(2): 499-513, 1998 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9819925

ABSTRACT

The Brief Symptom Inventory was administered to 228 women (M age: 37) consecutively admitted to specialized inpatient treatment for trauma-related disorders. Subsamples of patients were administered different posttraumatic stress disorder scales, the Impact of Events Scale-Revised, the Posttraumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale, and the PTSD scale of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III, as well as a measure of child abuse and neglect, the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. In this severely traumatized group, every scale of the Brief Symptom Inventory was significantly more elevated than the inpatient female norms, with the five most highly elevated scales being Depression, Obsessive-Compulsive, Anxiety, Interpersonal Sensitivity, and Psychoticism. Different indicators of trauma (Childhood Trauma Questionnaire, PTSD scales, and PTSD diagnosis) show different patterns of relationships with the individual scales of the Brief Symptom Inventory. There is no simple relationship between trauma and BSI symptoms, but clinicians should consider severe interpersonal trauma to be one pathway to pervasively elevated profiles of the Brief Symptom Inventory.


Subject(s)
Patient Admission , Personality Inventory/statistics & numerical data , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Adult , Child , Child Abuse/psychology , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Psychometrics , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology
5.
J Pers Assess ; 70(2): 277-98, 1998 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9697331

ABSTRACT

Herman's (1992a) formulation of complex PTSD was not incorporated into the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed. [DSM-IV]; American Psychiatric Association, 1994), but finds ample confirmation in personality assessment of women in inpatient treatment for trauma-related disorders. This study relates MCMI-III and Adult Attachment Scale scores to a self-report measure of childhood abuse and neglect, the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. Consistent with Herman's formulation, the data reveal a wide array of symptoms coupled with two facets of relationship disturbance: (a) enmeshment in ambivalence (depressive, dependent, and self-defeating personality as well as ambivalent attachment), and (b) more profound isolation (avoidant and schizoid personality coupled with profoundly insecure attachment). We present a model for using such psychometric findings in patient education and diagnostic evaluations.


Subject(s)
Child Abuse/psychology , Personality Inventory , Psychometrics , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Adult , Child , Child Abuse/diagnosis , Female , Humans , Models, Psychological , Object Attachment , Patient Education as Topic , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/rehabilitation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...