Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 18(7): 2145102, 2022 12 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36471629

ABSTRACT

Cancer patients with autoimmune disease (AID) are usually excluded from clinical trials involving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The available electronic databases were systematically searched from inception until July 3, 2022. We recorded the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) data of included studies. This meta-analysis included 14 studies comprising 11511 participants; however, only 8716 participants were treated with ICI. Therefore, the analysis was conducted on 8716 patients (769 patients with AID compared to 7947 patients without AID). The pooled risk ratio (RR) for any grade and grade ≥3 irAEs was 1.74 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.27-2.37) and 1.43 (95% CI: 1.10-1.88), respectively. The irAEs in the same system as that of the AID were referred to as AID-homogeneous irAEs; in the other cases, there were referred to as AID-heterogeneous irAEs. Subgroup analysis found that the higher risk of AID-homogeneous irAEs contributed to the higher risk of overall irAEs among patients with AID. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) for PFS and OS was 1.09 (95% CI: 0.96-1.24) and 1.07 (95% CI: 0.94-1.22), respectively. The results of PFS and OS subgroup analyses matched the overall results. Patients with AID had a significantly higher risk of developing any grade and ≥3 grade irAEs under ICI therapy, specifically AID-homogeneous irAEs; however, the frequency of AID-heterogeneous irAEs in patients with AID was similar to irAEs in patients without AID. No statistically significant differences in PFS and OS were observed between the two groups.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological , Autoimmune Diseases , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Neoplasms , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Autoimmune Diseases/drug therapy , Autoimmune Diseases/chemically induced
2.
Open Med (Wars) ; 16(1): 728-736, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34013044

ABSTRACT

This study evaluates the impact of the use of antibiotics on the effectiveness of nivolumab in the treatment of advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A literature search was conducted in various electronic databases to identify studies, which evaluated the impact of antibiotic use on the survival of patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC who have been treated with nivolumab. Six studies, comprising a total of 787 patients with 37.2% females and of age range 30-90 years, were included in the study. A lack of smoking history was reported in 14.4% of the patients. A meta-analysis was conducted in 678 and 713 patients for PFS and OS, respectively. The pooled HR was 1.95 (95% CI: 1.13-3.37, P = 0.016) for PFS and 2.70 (95% CI: 1.81-4.02, P < 0.001) for OS. Among patients exposed to antibiotics, the median PFS and OS were reduced by 1.6 months (95% CI: 1.5-1.7) and 8.8 months (95% CI: 8.5-9.1), respectively. Our study indicates that, among patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC, the use of antibiotics with nivolumab led to a decrease in the median OS by more than 8 months. Studying the mechanism of the effect of antibiotics on the efficacy of nivolumab in patients with NSCLC should also be prioritized.

3.
Transl Cancer Res ; 10(7): 3389-3403, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35116644

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluates the incidence of the gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events with the use of PD-1 inhibitors among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: The PICOs (participants, intervention, comparison, and outcomes) elements were used for the selection of studies to meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Google Scholar, PubMed, Science Direct and proceedings of major oncology conferences were systematically searched from their inception to December 2020, to identify studies which reported the GI adverse events of PD-1 inhibitors among patients with NSCLC. Risks of bias were assessed by using a revised methodological index for nonrandomized studies (MINORS). Pooled incidences and weighted relative risk (RR) estimate for GI adverse events, the incidence of treatment discontinuation due to GI adverse events was also calculated. To perform the analysis of qualified studies, the model of random effects was used and the inconsistency of studies with the I2 index was investigated. OpenMeta 10.10, Stata 11.0 and RevMan 5.3 software were used for data analysis. RESULTS: The research included 15 studies comprising of a total of 3,716 patients. The incidences of all-grade GI symptoms were: diarrhea 8.6% (95% CI: 6.6-10.6%), nausea 9.2% (95% CI: 7.3-11.0%), vomiting 3.2% (95% CI: 1.9-4.5%), constipation 2.8% (95% CI: 1.8-3.9%), colitis 0.7% (95% CI: 0.4-1.1%), stomatitis (95% CI: 1.0-2.7%), and decreased appetite 10.0% (95% CI: 8.3-11.7%). Therapy using PD-1 inhibitors was discontinued in 2.5% (95% CI: 0.0-5.1%) of patients with nausea, in 3.0% (95% CI: 0.7-5.3%) of those with diarrhea, and in 45.7% (95% CI: 20.6-70.7%) of patients with colitis. Compared with chemotherapy, the use of PD-1 inhibitors showed significant increase in the occurrence of grade 1-4 colitis (RR =3.90, 95% CI: 1.41-10.81, P=0.009) and grade 3-4 colitis (RR =3.76, 95% CI: 1.07-13.26, P=0.04). DISCUSSION: This meta-analysis provides a reliable estimate of the incidences of GI adverse events among NSCLC patients. Especially when colitis does occur, it often results in therapy discontinuation. Use of PD-1 inhibitors led to a higher incidence of colitis as compared to the use of chemotherapy.

4.
Open Med (Wars) ; 15(1): 447-456, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33313405

ABSTRACT

This study evaluates the efficacy of pembrolizumab for the treatment of advanced/metastatic melanoma. The literature search was conducted in electronic databases for studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab either alone or in combination with other treatments advanced/metastatic melanoma patients. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to achieve pooled effect sizes of response and survival rates. The overall objective response rate (ORR) was 34.2% [95% confidence interval (CI): 30.4, 38.0]. However, ORR differed with respect to the history of prior systemic therapy. ORR was lower in studies with over 50% patients with prior therapy (25.5% [22.4, 28.5]) than in studies with under 50% patients with prior therapy (40.1% [34.1, 46.1]). ORR was higher in pembrolizumab monotherapy (32.9% [28.1, 37.7]) than in pembrolizumab-ipilimumab combination (27.6% [24.0, 31.2]). Overall ORR was inversely associated with visceral metastasis and prior systemic therapy. With pembrolizumab treatment, either alone or in combination, the progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.73 months; 12-, 24-, and 60-month PFS rate were 44%, 27%, and 25%, respectively; and 12-, 24-, and 60-month overall survival rates were 65%, 50%, and 41%, respectively. The percentage of AEs that led to treatment discontinuation was 13%. Pembrolizumab monotherapy is a valuable option for the treatment of advanced/metastatic melanoma patients.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...