ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To grade the pathological response of lymph nodes (LNs) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) and investigate its prognostic significance. METHODS: This retrospective study included 196 patients who underwent NAC, followed by radical gastrectomy for LAGC between January 2010 and October 2019. Pathological responses were evaluated based on the proportion of residual tumor cells within the tumor area in the primary tumor (PT) and LNs and included the following categories: 1a (0%), 1b (< 10%), 2 (10-50%), and 3 (> 50%). RESULTS: Among 166 patients with clinically node-positive disease, 38/27/39/62 were classified as having LN regression grade (LRG) 1a/1b/2/3, respectively. Compared to LN non-responders (LRG 2 or 3), LN responders (LRG 1a or 1b) had significantly higher 5-year overall survival (72.5% vs. 19.0%, P < 0.001) and recurrence-free survival rates (67.8% vs. 22.2%, P < 0.001), irrespective of PT response. Furthermore, a multivariate analysis revealed that the LN response was an independent risk factor for the overall survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.417, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.181-0.962, P = 0.040) and recurrence-free survival (HR 0.490, 95% CI 0.242-0.991, P = 0.047), but not the PT response (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The pathological LN response may be a reliable prognostic prediction tool in patients with LAGC who received NAC.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To explore the clinical study of glutamine combined with early enteral nutrition support on the nutritional status of gastric cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: Divided into control and observation groups, a control group received routine enteral nutrition, while the observation group received an additional 0.5 g/kg/d of glutamine. The researchers measured nutritional indicators, immunoglobulins, T lymphocyte subsets, and stress indexes such as fasting blood sugar and C-reactive protein throughout the study. Results: Before nutritional support, there was no significant difference in the HGB, TP, and ALB levels. During nutritional support, however, the observation group began registering significantly higher levels of HGB, TP, and ALB, suggesting that glutamine intervention can improve the nutritional status of patients. Throughout the study, the CD4+ level showed a consistent increase in the observation group. The levels of IgA and IgG in the observation group also grew significantly higher. Both groups had higher blood glucose levels before nutritional support. However, on day 8 and day 15, the levels decreased. The observation group had significantly lower fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels than the control group. By day 15, the FBG levels in the observation group were close to normal. The CRP level showed a consistent decrease in the observation group compared to the control group on day 8 and day 15. Glutamine intervention appears to improve the stress capacity of gastric cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Overall, the findings suggest that glutamine intervention in enteral nutrition can significantly improve immune function, nutritional status, and stress capacity in gastric cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and appears to be more effective than conventional enteral nutrition. Conclusion: The combination of glutamine and early enteral nutrition support can significantly improve gastric cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy's nutritional status and immune function levels. It is a safe and reliable enteral nutrition support method worthy of clinical promotion.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Research has confirmed that transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) is one of the cytokines related to radiation pneumonitis. But the level of TGF-beta1 in serum needed to predict radiation pneumonitis is still not clear. This study assessed the value of TGF-beta1 in both serum and induced sputum in predicting radiation pneumonitis, providing a reference for the radiotherapy of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: A total of 23 patients with NSCLC treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in our department between November 2007 and January 2009 were analyzed and evaluated. TGF-beta1 levels in both serum and sputum were detected before and near the end of radiotherapy for all the patients. The TGF-beta1 level in serum was measured with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Immunocytochemistry assays were used to detect TGF-beta1 expression in sputum sediment. Radiation pneumonitis was graded according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) radiation scoring criteria every 3 weeks from the start to 3 months after the end of treatment. RESULTS: Radiation pneumonitis was noted in 9 patients in this cohort. The total incidence of radiation pneumonitis was 39.1% (9/23) and those with Grade II or worse was 30.4% (7/23). The absolute TGF-beta1 level in serum after radiotherapy was higher than before radiotherapy, but there was no statistical difference (P = 0.139). Patients with increased levels of TGF-beta1 had a higher incidence of radiation pneumonitis (45.5%) than those with decreased TGF-beta1 levels post-radiotherapy (40.0%). Though there was a tendency of higher incidence of radiation pneumonitis with increases in TGF-beta1 level, no statistical difference was found (P = 1.000). Patients with tumor response had higher incidence of radiation pneumonitis (50.0%) than patients without when TGF-beta1 levels in serum increased, but there was no statistical difference (P = 0.792). TGF-beta1 was positively expressed (brown yellow) in sputum on immunocytochemistry assays and located in the cytoplasm of either macrophages or epithelial cells. Macrophages were the main cells expressing TGF-beta1. A significantly higher positive expression rate (71.4%) was found in sputum post-radiotherapy than pre-radiotherapy (28.6%) (P = 0.015). The higher incidence of radiation pneumonitis (46.7%) was found in patients with positive TGF-beta1 expression in sputum post-radiotherapy than those with negative expression post-radiotherapy (14.3%) (P = 0.193). CONCLUSION: It may be more reasonable to predict radiation pneumonitis by combining the change of TGF-beta1 levels in serum with tumor response than just the change of TGF-beta1 levels in serum alone. TGF-beta1 can positively express in the sputum of patients with NSCLC, located in macrophages and epithelial cells, with macrophages as the main areas of expression. Patients with positively expressed TGF-beta1 in sputum after radiotherapy have a higher incidence of radiation pneumonitis than those with negative expressions. The positive expression of TGF-beta1 in sputum is expected to become a factor for predicting radiation pneumonitis.
