Peripheral blood stem cell transplantation from haploidentical related donor could achieve satisfactory clinical outcomes for intermediate- or high-risk adult acute myeloid leukemia patients.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the most important curative method for intermediate- and high-risk adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. We aimed to identify the clinical outcomes of haploidentical related donor (HID) peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) who receiving peripheral blood (G-PB) harvest, and the patients receiving bone marrow (BM) plus G-PB harvest (BM + PB) as grafts were enrolled as control. The engraftments of neutrophil and platelet in G-PB group were both faster than those in BM + PB group. The cumulative incidences of grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), and moderate to severe chronic GVHD (cGVHD) were all comparable between G-PB and BM + PB groups. The cumulative incidence of relapse and non-relapse mortality at 3 years after HID HSCT was 12.6% versus 13.7% (p = 0.899) and 3.6% versus 7.3% (p = 0.295), respectively, in G-PB and BM + PB group. While the probabilities of GVHD-free/relapse-free survival, leukemia-free survival, and overall survival at 3 years after HID HSCT were 60.6% versus 53.4% (p = 0.333), 83.8% versus 79.0% (p = 0.603), and were 87.3% versus 82.9% (p = 0.670), respectively. We confirmed the safety and efficacy of HID PBSCT in intermediate- and high-risk AML patients in a large cohort.

Outcomes of haploidentical haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for adolescent and young adults with acute myeloid leukaemia.

We aimed to identify the efficacy of haploidentical related donor (HID) haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in adolescent and young adults (AYAs) with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) in a large cohort. Consecutive AML AYAs (15-39 years old, n = 599) receiving HID HSCT in complete remission (CR) were included. The 3-year cumulative incidence of measurable residual disease occurrence, relapse and non-relapse mortality after HID HSCT was 28.6% (95% CI: 25.0-32.2), 11.6% (95% CI: 9.0-14.2) and 6.7% (95% CI: 4.7-8.7) respectively. The 3-year probability of event-free survival, leukaemia-free survival (LFS) and overall survival (OS) after HID HSCT was 60.7% (95% CI: 56.9-64.8), 81.7% (95% CI: 78.7-84.9) and 85.6% (95% CI: 82.8-88.4) respectively. In multivariable analysis, AML risk category at diagnosis and comorbidity burdens before HID HSCT were independently associated with LFS and OS. Compared to the older adults (≥ 40 years, n = 355) with AML receiving HID HSCT in CR during the same time period, AYAs have a lower incidence of non-relapse mortality and higher probabilities of LFS and OS. Thus, we firstly confirmed the safety and efficacy of HID HSCT in AYAs with AML-CR.

Prognostic factors for patients with hematologic malignancies admitted to the intensive care unit: is allogeneic transplantation still a risk factor?

The rate of intensive care unit (ICU) mortality in patients with hematologic malignancies is high. The risk factors for this were inconsistent across several previous studies, and there is currently no accepted consensus around risk factors for these patients. We aimed to identify which prognostic factors were associated with ICU mortality in critically ill patients with hematologic malignancies, nearly half of which were allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients. In addition, we aimed to compare the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with and without allogenic allo-HSCT. In total, 217 patients with hematologic malignancies were enrolled consecutive, 119 (54.8%) of whom underwent HSCT (allo-HSCT: n = 115). All survivors were followed up with until August 1, 2022. The rate of ICU mortality in this cohort was 54.4%: 55.5 and 53.1% for the patients with and without HSCT, respectively (p = 0.724). The probabilities of survival after ICU admission were also comparable between the patients who had allo-HSCT and those who did not. A multivariable analysis revealed that cerebrovascular disease, hyperlactic acidemia on the day of ICU admission, lower platelet count, use of vasoactive drugs, and absence of noninvasive ventilation on the day of ICU admission were independent risk factors for ICU mortality. For patients with three to five of these risk factors, the rate of ICU mortality was as high as 84.6%, which was significantly higher than that of other patients. In this study, the ICU mortality rate in patients with hematologic malignancies was still high, particularly for those with multiple risk factors. However, allo-HSCT was not found to be a risk factor for ICU mortality.

Efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease: A meta-analysis.

Ruxolitinib is an important treatment for steroid refractory graft-versus-host disease (SR-GVHD). Therefore, we reported the updated results of a systematic review and meta-analysis of ruxolitinib as treatment for SR-GVHD. In addition, we wanted to compare the efficacy and safety between children and adults with SR-GVHD. Overall response rate (ORR) after ruxolitinib treatment was chosen as the primary end point. Complete response rate (CRR), infection, myelosuppression, and overall survival (OS) were chosen as secondary end points. A total of 37 studies were included in this meta-analysis, and 1,580 patients were enrolled. ORR at any time after ruxolitinib treatment was 0.77 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68-0.84] and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.74-0.81), respectively, for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD. CRR at any time after ruxolitinib treatment was 0.49 (95% CI: 0.40-0.57) and 0.15 (95% CI: 0.10-0.23), respectively, for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD. The ORRs at any time after treatment was highest in mouth SR-cGVHD, followed by skin, gut, joints and fascia, liver, eyes, esophagus, and lung SR-cGVHD. The incidence rate of infections after ruxolitinib treatment was 0.61 (95% CI: 0.45-0.76) and 0.47 (95% CI: 0.31-0.63), respectively, for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD. The incidence rates of overall (grades I-IV) and severe (grades III-IV) cytopenia were 53.2% (95% CI: 16.0%-90.4%) and 31.0% (95% CI: 0.0-100.0%), respectively, for SR-aGVHD, and were 28.8% (95% CI:13.0%-44.6%) and 10.4% (95% CI: 0.0-27.9%), respectively, for SR-cGVHD. The probability rate of OS at 6 months after treatment was 63.9% (95% CI: 52.5%-75.2%) for SR-aGVHD. The probability rates of OS at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after treatment were 95% (95% CI: 79.5%-100.0%), 78.7% (95% CI: 67.2%-90.1%), and 75.3% (95% CI: 68.0%-82.7%), respectively, for SR-cGVHD. The ORR, CRR, infection events, and myelosuppression were all comparable between children and adults with SR-GVHD. In summary, this study suggests that ruxolitinib is an effective and safe treatment for SR-GVHD, and both children and adults with SR-GVHD could benefit from ruxolitinib treatment.