Detection of polyreactive immunoglobulin G facilitates diagnosis in children with autoimmune hepatitis.

OBJECTIVE: The detection of autoantibodies is essential to diagnose autoimmune hepatitis (AIH). Particularly in children, specificity of autoantibodies decreases due to lower titers being diagnostic and being present not only in AIH but also in other liver diseases. Recently, quantification of polyreactive IgG (pIgG) for detection of adult AIH showed the highest overall accuracy compared to antinuclear antibodies (ANA), anti-smooth muscle antibodies (anti-SMA), anti-liver kidney microsomal antibodies (anti-LKM) and anti-soluble liver antigen/liver pancreas antibodies (anti-SLA/LP). We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic value of pIgG for pediatric AIH. DESIGN: pIgG, quantified using HIP1R/BSA coated ELISA, and immunofluorescence on rodent tissue sections were performed centrally. The diagnostic fidelity to diagnose AIH was compared to conventional autoantibodies of AIH in training and validation cohorts from a retrospective, European multi-center cohort from nine centers from eight European countries composed of existing biorepositories from expert centers (n = 285). RESULTS: IgG from pediatric AIH patients exhibited increased polyreactivity to multiple protein and non-protein substrates compared to non-AIH liver diseases and healthy children. pIgG had an AUC of 0.900 to distinguish AIH from non-AIH liver diseases. pIgG had a 31-73% higher specificity than ANA and anti-SMA and comparable sensitivity that was 6-20 times higher than of anti-SLA/LP, anti-LC1 and anti-LKM. pIgG had a 21-34% higher accuracy than conventional autoantibodies, was positive in 43-75% of children with AIH and normal IgG and independent from treatment response. CONCLUSION: Detecting pIgG improves the diagnostic evaluation of pediatric AIH compared to conventional autoantibodies, primarily owing to higher accuracy and specificity.

Clinical long-term outcome of hepatitis D compared to hepatitis B monoinfection.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection causes the most severe form of chronic viral hepatitis. However, it is still unclear to what extent the underlying cirrhosis may contribute to disease progression. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term outcome of HDV infection with HBV monoinfection in a single-center cohort of both non-cirrhotic and cirrhotic patients. METHOD: We retrospectively studied 175 patients with chronic hepatitis D (CHD) who were followed for at least 6 months (median of 6.3 (0.6-23.6) years). In addition, we selected 175 patients with HBV monoinfection (CHB) who were matched for gender, age, region of origin, HBeAg status, and bilirubin. Liver-related clinical end points were defined as hepatic decompensation (ascites, encephalopathy, variceal bleeding), liver transplantation, HCC, or liver-related death. RESULTS: Clinical complications developed earlier (4.6 vs. 6.2 years) and more frequently (35.4% vs. 12.6%, p < 0.01) in CHD patients. In a multivariate Cox regression, HDV infection was independently associated with the development of end points (p < 0.01; HR: 3.0; 95% CI 1.4-6.4). However, in cirrhotic patients there were no significant differences between HBV and HDV in the development of end points. Besides, CHB patients with cirrhosis developed more frequently HCC (35.5%) than CHD patients with cirrhosis (18.5%). CONCLUSION: Our results confirmed that HDV leads to a faster progression to cirrhosis compared to HBV. However, once cirrhosis is present, not HDV but the underlying cirrhosis is the dominate intrinsic risk factor for the development of liver-related end points and for the progression to HCC.

Dulaglutide Alone and in Combination with Empagliflozin Attenuate Inflammatory Pathways and Microbiome Dysbiosis in a Non-Diabetic Mouse Model of NASH.

Dysregulation of glucose homeostasis plays a major role in the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) as it activates proinflammatory and profibrotic processes. Beneficial effects of antiglycemic treatments such as GLP-1 agonist or SGLT-2 inhibitor on NASH in patients with diabetes have already been investigated. However, their effect on NASH in a non-diabetic setting remains unclear. With this aim, we investigated the effect of long-acting GLP1-agonist dulaglutide and SGLT-2 inhibitor empagliflozin and their combination in a non-diabetic mouse model of NASH. C57BL/6 mice received a high-fat-high-fructose (HFHC) diet with a surplus of cholesterol for 16 weeks. After 12 weeks of diet, mice were treated with either dulaglutide, empagliflozin or their combination. Dulaglutide alone and in combination with empagliflozin led to significant weight loss, improved glucose homeostasis and diminished anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic pathways. Combination of dulaglutide and empagliflozin further decreased MoMFLy6CHigh and CD4+Foxp3+ T cells. No beneficial effects for treatment with empagliflozin alone could be shown. While no effect of dulaglutide or its combination with empaglifozin on hepatic steatosis was evident, these data demonstrate distinct anti-inflammatory effects of dulaglutide and their combination with empagliflozin in a non-diabetic background, which could have important implications for further treatment of NASH.

Novel therapeutic targets in autoimmune hepatitis.

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is an orphan disease characterized by an autoimmune attack against hepatocytes. The exact sequence of events that leads to a breach of tolerance is incompletely understood. Current hypotheses suggest that environmental agents such as toxins or infectious agents like viruses cause a tissue damage that initiates autoimmunity in genetically susceptible individuals. The growing knowledge of the multi-facetted immune dysregulation, which involves Th1/Th17 polarization and the suspected inability of regulatory T cells to revert autoimmunity in the otherwise tolerogenic milieu of the liver, offers multiple new therapeutic approaches and targets. Standard of care (SOC) is treatment with corticosteroids with or without azathioprine, which is sufficient to induce remission in the majority of patients. However, it rarely cures AIH or restores intrahepatic immune tolerance. Hence, life-long therapy is required in the majority of patients. In addition, several studies suggest a weakening of immune regulation mediated by intrahepatic T cells under current therapies. Furthermore, second line therapies for non-responders, intolerant or otherwise difficult to treat patients are urgently needed as this is relevant for at least one fifth of all patients with inefficacy or intolerance to SOC. Current second line therapies are mainly based on single center retrospective experiences and none of them have been approved by regulatory authorities for AIH, yet. This article highlights new therapeutic approaches based on our growing knowledge on the pathophysiology of AIH. It focuses on cell-based therapies that strengthen or restore immune tolerance. An additional focus lies on new therapeutic agents showing promising results in non-hepatic autoimmune diseases that have a potential for treating AIH. The dynamics in the whole field of innovative therapies for non-hepatic autoimmune diseases will hopefully improve the therapeutic armamentarium for AIH patients in the future.