Single isocenter HyperArc treatment of multiple intracranial metastases: Targeting accuracy.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: (A) To examine the alignment accuracy of CBCT guidance for brain metastases with off centered isocenters, (B) to test dose delivery and targeting accuracy for single isocenter treatments with multiple brain metastases. We report the results of the end-to-end test for Truebeam stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). MATERIALS/METHODS: An anthropomorphic CT head phantom was drilled with five MOSFET inserts and two PTW Pinpoint chamber inserts. The phantom was simulated, planned, and delivered. For the purpose of comparing the accuracy of alignment, CBCTs were acquired with the isocenter centered and offset superiorly 8 cm, inferiorly 8 cm, anteriorly 7 cm, posteriorly 7 cm, and right 5 cm. There were six degrees of freedom corrections applied to the plans, as well as intentional rotational and translational errors for dose comparisons. Dose accuracy checks were performed with MOSFET and PTW Pinpoint chamber, and targeting accuracy was assessed with GafChromic films. RESULT: (A) Compared to centered CBCT, off-centered CBCT scan showed some alignment errors, with a maximum difference of 0.6-degree pitch and 0.9 mm translation when the phantom was placed 8 cm inferior off center. (B) For the single isocenter plan, measured doses of the five MOSFET were 95%-100% of the planned dose, whereas the multiple isocenter plans were 96%-100%. With intentional setup errors of 1-degree pitch, doses were 97.1%-100.4% compared to the perfect setup. The same was found for the two pinpoint chamber readings with 1-degree rotation and 1 mm translation. (C) Targeting accuracy for targets at the isocenter is 0.67 mm, within the machine specification of 0.75 mm. Targeting accuracy for isocenters 6-12 cm away from the target is in the range 0.67-1.18 mm. CONCLUSION: (A) Single isocenter HyperArc treatments for multiple brain metastases are feasible and targeting accuracy is clinically acceptable. (B) The vertex in a cranial scan is very important for proper alignment.

Is Halcyon feasible for single thoracic or lumbar vertebral segment SBRT?

PURPOSE: Halcyon linear accelerators employ intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) techniques. The Halcyon offers translational, but not rotational, couch correction, which only allows a 3 degrees of freedom (3-DOF) correction. In contrast, the TrueBeam (TB) linear accelerator offers full 6-DOF corrections. This study aims to evaluate the difference in treatment plan quality for single thoracic or lumbar vertebral segment SBRT between the Halcyon and TB linear accelerators. In addition, this study will also investigate the effect of patient rotational setup errors on the final plan quality. METHODS: We analyzed 20 patients with a single-level spine metastasis located between the T7 and L5 vertebrae near the spinal canal. The median planning target volume was 52.0 cm3 (17.9-138.7 cm3 ). The median tumor diameter in the axial plane was 4.6 cm (range 1.7-6.8 cm), in the sagittal plane was 3.3 cm (range 2-5 cm). The prescription doses were either 12-16 Gy in 1 fraction or 18-24 Gy in 3 fractions. All patients were treated on the TB linear accelerator with a 2.5 mm Multi-Leaf Collimator (MLC) leaf width. Treatment plans were retrospectively created for the Halcyon, which has a 5 mm effective MLC leaf width. The 20 patients had a total of 50 treatments. Analysis of the 50 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans showed average rotational setup errors of 0.6°, 1.2°, and 0.8° in pitch, yaw, and roll, respectively. Rotational error in roll was not considered in this study, as the original TB plans used a coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique, and each 1° of roll will contribute an error of 1/360. If a plan has 3 arcs, the contribution from errors in roll will be < 0.1%. To simulate different patient setup errors, for each patient, 12 CT image datasets were generated in Velocity AI with different rotational combinations at a pitch and yaw of 1°, 2°, and 3°, respectively. We recalculated both the TB and Halcyon plans on these rotated images.  The dosimetric plan quality was evaluated based on the percent tumor coverage, the Conformity Index (CI), Gradient Index (GI), Homogeneity index (HI), the maximum dose to the cord/cauda, and the volume of the cord/cauda receiving 8, 10, and 12 Gy (V8Gy, V10Gy and V12Gy). Paired t-tests were performed between the original and rotated plans with a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: The Eclipse based VMAT plans on Halcyon achieved a similar target coverage (92.3 ± 3.0% vs. 92.4 ± 3.3%, p = 0.82) and CI (1.0 ± 0.1 vs. 1.1 ± 0.2, p = 0.12) compared to the TB plans. The Gradient index of Halcyon is higher (3.96 ±0.8) than TB (3.85 ±0.7), but not statistically significant. The maximum dose to the spinal cord/cauda was comparable (11.1 ± 2.8 Gy vs. 11.4 ± 3.6 Gy, p = 0.39), as were the V8Gy, V10Gy and V12Gy to the cord/cauda. The dosimetric influence of patient rotational setup error was statistically insignificant for rotations of up to 1° pitch/yaw (with similar target coverage, CI, max cord/cauda dose and V8Gy, V10Gy, V12Gy for cord/cauda). The total number of monitor units (MUs) for Halcyon (4998 ± 1688) was comparable to that of TB (5463 ± 2155) (p = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: The Halcyon VMAT plans for a single thoracic or lumbar spine metastasis were dosimetrically comparable to the TB plans. Patient rotation within 1° in the pitch and yaw directions, if corrected by translation, resulted in insignificant dosimetric effects. The Halcyon linear accelerator is an acceptable alternative to TB for the treatment of single thoracic or lumbar spinal level metastasis, but users need to be cautious about the patient rotational setup error.  It is advisable to select patients appropriately, including only those with the thoracic or lumbar spine involvement and keeping at least 2 mm separation between the target and the cord/cauda. More margin is needed if the distance between the isocenter and cord/cauda is larger. It is advisable to place the planning isocenter close to the spinal canal to further mitigate the rotational error. SUMMARY: We simulated various scenarios of patient setup errors with different rotational combinations of pitch and yaw with 1°, 2°, and 3°, respectively. Rotation was corrected with translation only to mimic the Halcyon treatment scenario. Using the Halcyon for treating a tumor in a single thoracic or lumbar vertebral segment is feasible, but caution should be noted in patients requiring rotational corrections of > 1° in the absence of 6-DOF correction capabilities.

Optimization of the accelerated partial breast brachytherapy fractionation considering radiation effect on planning target and organs at risk.

The same fractionation scheme of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) with brachytherapy is usually applied to APBI patients without considering the radiaton effect on the planning target and organs at risk (OARs) for an individual patient. The purpose of this study is to report the results of optimization of the fractionation scheme by evaluating the radiation effect on target and OARs with a modified linear-quadratic model, universal survival curve (USC), based on dose-volume histograms (DVHs). Ten breast patients treated with multilumen balloon brachytherapy were selected. The minimum skin and chest wall/rib (CW/rib) spacing ranged from 2.5 to 14.3 mm and from 0.5 to 25.0 mm, respectively. The USC model parameters were set as: (1) breast:α = 0.3, ß = 0.05; (2) skin: acute reaction α = 0.101, ß = 0.009; late reaction α = 0.064, ß = 0.029; (3) CW/rib: α = 0.3, ß = 0.12. Boundary dose Dt was 6 Gy for both target and OARs. The relation between radiation effects on the target (ET) and OARs (EOAR) were plotted for fraction numbers (N) from 1 to 20. If ET is set at a certain value, the fractionation that results in a minimum EOAR value corresponds to the optimal fractionation. The results show that the optimal fractionation is different for different OAR damage effects. For most of the patients, N = 2 is best for minimizing skin acute reactions while N = 20 is best for minimizing skin late reactions. N varies from 3 to 20 among patients for minimizing CW/rib toxicity. The determined unique optimal N for treatment delivery was found to vary from 1 to 20 among these 10 patients resulted from balancing the different damage effects considering the spatial dose for a given patient geometry. Optimal fractionation can be achieved for an individual patient by evaluating the radiation effect on tumor and OARs with the USC model based on the patient specific DVHs with APBI brachytherapy.

A Mobile Alert System for Preparing the Delivery of Radiation Mitigators.

BACKGROUND/AIM: A mobile system allowing hospital medical personnel to prepare for the administration of radiation mitigators prior to receiving casualties is desirable. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated a portable spectroscopic personal radiation detector for use as an ambulance-based unit for early detection and identification of gamma radiation. We tested the sensitivity, time-to-identification, and radionuclide identification accuracy rates, change in detector response to vehicle operation, interference from cardiac equipment, and internal versus external radiation source location. RESULTS: We detected radiation sources in each of 119 trials using a humanoid phantom in a moving ambulance with a primary radionuclide identification accuracy of 96%. Typical identification time was around two minutes (149±95 s). CONCLUSION: Our observations suggest this mobile system is a potential pre-hospital arrival tool allowing for rapid preparation of radiation mitigators.

Dosimetric definitions of total lung volumes in calculating parameters predictive for radiation-induced pneumonitis.

OBJECTIVES: The volume of normal lung receiving 20 Gy (V20) and the mean lung dose (MLD) represent dosimetric parameters used for identifying risk of radiation pneumonitis. However, the total lung volume for dosimetric analysis has been defined differently. Herein we investigate to quantify the dosimetric differences when analysis is based on either definition (ie, excluding planning target volume [PTV] vs. gross tumor volume [GTV] from the total bilateral lung volume). METHODS: Sixty-one patients with lung cancer who had undergone definitive radiation therapy were retrospectively reviewed. Dosimetric parameters were calculated when excluding GTV or PTV from the total bilateral lung volume. RESULTS: Median GTV to PTV margin was 1.3 cm (range, 0.4 to 3.8 cm). Median heterogeneity-corrected RT dose was 74 Gy with the median GTV of 110 mL (range, 13.79 to 665.8 mL) and the median PTV of 346 mL (range, 39.8 to 1258 mL).The MLD, V5, V10, V20, and V30 were all slightly higher and significant when excluding GTV from the total bilateral lung volume compared with similar dosimetric parameters when excluding PTV (P<0.001). Average MLD was 14.8 and 16.7 Gy when excluding PTV and GTV, respectively. Mean V5, V10, V20, and V30 were 49.8%, 38%, 25%, and 18.8% when excluding PTV versus 51.3%, 40%, 28%, and 21.5% when excluding GTV. There were 4 patients with clinical pneumonitis and all had the V20>23% when excluding the PTV versus the V20>27% when excluding the GTV from total bilateral lung volume. CONCLUSIONS: A small but significant difference exists between the 2 approaches used to calculate dosimetric variables for lung dose. This difference should be taken into account when comparing dosimetric information between different institutions and when optimizing treatment plans.

Improved survival of mice after total body irradiation with 10 MV photon, 2400 MU/min SRS beam.

BACKGROUND/AIM: We evaluated the radiobiological effects of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) photon beams on survival of C57BL/6NTac mice following total body irradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Survival of Lewis lung carcinoma (3LL) cells was tested after irradiation using 6 MV: 300 MU/min or 1400 MU/min; or 10 MV: 300 MU/min or 2400 MU/min. Survival of C57BL/6NTac mice after a dose which is lethal to 50% of the mice in 30 days (LD50/30) (9.25 Gy) total body irradiation (TBI) and 21 Gy to orthotopic 3LL tumors was tested. We quantitated levels of organ-specific gene transcripts by Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR). RESULTS: While 3LL cell survival and inhibition of orthotopic tumor growth was uniform, 10 MV photons at 2400 MU/min TBI led to significantly greater survival (p=0.0218), with higher levels of intestinal (Sod2), (Gpx1), (Nrf2), and (NFκB) RNA transcripts. CONCLUSION: Clinical 10 MV-2400 cGy/min SRS beams led to unexpected protection of mice on TBI and increased radioprotective gene transcripts.