ABSTRACT
Different hyperelastic material models (Mooney-Rivlin, Yeoh, Gent, Arruda-Boyce and Ogden) are able to estimate Treloar's test data series containing uniaxial and biaxial tension and pure shear stress-strain characteristics of rubber. If the rubber behaviour is only determined for the specific load of the product, which, in the case of rubber bumpers, is the compression, the time needed for the laboratory test can be significantly decreased. The stress-strain characteristics of the uniaxial compression test of rubber samples were used to fit hyperelastic material models. Laboratory and numerical tests of a rubber bumper with a given compound and complex geometry were used to determine the accuracy of the material models. Designing rubber products requires special consideration of the numerical discretization process due to the nonlinear behaviours (material nonlinearity, large deformation, connections, etc.). Modelling considerations were presented for the finite element analysis of the rubber bumper. The results showed that if only uniaxial compression test data are available for the curve fitting of the material model, the Yeoh model performs the best in predicting the rubber product material response under compressive load and complex strain state.