Anxiety/uncertainty reduction as a motivation for interest in prophylactic oophorectomy in women with a family history of ovarian cancer.

Most women at familial risk for ovarian cancer must decide about prophylactic oophorectomy without conclusive genotypic information about their risk level. Some women with relatively low-risk profiles seek prophylactic oophorectomy or are recommended the procedure by their physicians, if they appear "cancerphobic." This study investigated the desire to reduce anxiety in relation to other factors associated with interest in prophylactic oophorectomy in a group of women with varying degrees of familial risk for ovarian cancer. Ninety-four women enrolled in an ongoing program for women with a family history of ovarian cancer received personalized risk counseling and were classified as having a sporadic, familial, or putative hereditary pedigree by a genetics counselor. Eligible enrollees were interviewed by telephone about current and future interest in prophylactic oophorectomy, perceived risk of ovarian cancer, severity of cancer anxiety, stress-related ideation, and reasons for and against surgery. Reduction of anxiety/uncertainty was the factor most strongly associated with current interest in prophylactic oophorectomy, independent of objective risk classification, perceived risk, severity of cancer anxiety, intrusive ideation, or other variables. Future interest in prophylactic oophorectomy was predicted by other perceived benefits of surgery. Current, but not future, interest in prophylactic oophorectomy appears motivated in part by seeking immediate relief from anxiety. Interest in prophylactic oophorectomy may fluctuate based on varying exposure to cues that trigger anxiety. Women seeking prophylactic oophorectomy, particularly those with lower-risk family pedigrees, should be offered options for anxiety management as part of informed consent for prophylactic oophorectomy.

Time of rehabilitation admission and severity of trauma: effect on brain injury outcome.

Outcome after traumatic brain injury, defined by the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) and length of stay in acute rehabilitation, was measured in 59 patients admitted to an intensive rehabilitation program to examine the effects of severity of the initial brain injury, severity of multiple trauma, and length of stay in the acute care hospital. Severity of initial brain injury, best measured by length of coma, was the most significant predictor of GOS outcome. Length of acute hospitalization was a small, but significant, predictor of GOS. Severity of initial brain injury, length of acute hospitalization, and gender emerged as predictors of length of rehabilitation hospital stay. Although length of acute hospitalization is apparently affected by severity of brain injury, it adds significantly--more than severity of brain injury--to the prediction of length of rehabilitation.