Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Violence Vict ; 32(2): 251-264, 2017 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28130901

ABSTRACT

Every day, 16 American youths between the ages of 10 and 24 years are murdered; 84% of these fatalities involve a firearm. Nearly half of traumatic youth deaths result from violence-related injuries. In 2013, 580,250 youth suffered nonfatal, assault-related injuries, necessitating emergency department treatment. The aim of this multisite pilot study was to examine the process, feasibility, and challenges of violence brief interventions (VBIs). The participants were youth between 15 and 25 years of age, at 2 major Level 1 trauma centers (TCs; TC1, TC2) in the Southeastern United States. Eligible participants (N = 38; TC1: n = 20, TC2: n = 18) received at least 1 VBI during their hospital stay, which provided information about individual screening results and elicited patients' perspectives on violent and risky behaviors. More participants at TC2 than at TC1 completed 2 VBI sessions. Barriers to and support of implementation were identified at both sites, and factors for improving implementation were identified, including the need for staff support through clinical guidelines and coordinated prevention and outreach programs. Further research is needed to identify factors for successful implementation of VBIs in TCs.


Subject(s)
Health Promotion/methods , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Psychotherapy, Brief/methods , Violence/prevention & control , Adolescent , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Pilot Projects , Risk Factors , Southeastern United States , Trauma Centers , Violence/psychology , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Young Adult
2.
Prev Med ; 52 Suppl 1: S43-50, 2011 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21281670

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Current literature supports the link between physical activity (PA) or fitness and a child's ability to achieve academically; however, little structured activity time is incorporated into elementary school classrooms. This paper explores the impact of a classroom-based PA program, TAKE 10!, and health-academic integration through existing state and federal policy and programming. METHODS: Evidence from journal articles, published abstracts, and reports were examined to summarize the impact of TAKE 10! on student health and other outcomes. This paper reviews 10 years of TAKE 10! studies and makes recommendations for future research. RESULTS: Teachers are willing and able to implement classroom-based PA integrated with grade-specific lessons (4.2 days/wk). Children participating in the TAKE 10! program experience higher PA levels (13%>), reduced time-off-task (20.5%), and improved reading, math, spelling and composite scores (p<0.01). Furthermore, students achieved moderate energy expenditure levels (6.16 to 6.42 METs) and studies suggest that BMI may be positively impacted (decreases in BMI z score over 2 years [P<0.01]). CONCLUSION: TAKE 10! demonstrates that integrating movement with academics in elementary school classrooms is feasible, helps students focus on learning, and enables them to realize improved PA levels while also helping schools achieve wellness policies.


Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Educational Status , Exercise/physiology , Health Promotion/methods , Motor Activity/physiology , Physical Education and Training/methods , Body Mass Index , Child , Child Behavior , Cognition , Energy Metabolism/physiology , Faculty , Humans , Learning/physiology , Schools , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...