Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Biochemistry ; 29(7): 1961-70, 1990 Feb 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2184894

ABSTRACT

The interaction of the entire LexA repressor and its amino-terminal DNA binding domain with poly[d(A-T)] and random DNA has been studied by circular dichroism. Binding of both protein species induces an about 2-fold increase of the positive circular dichroism band at about 270 nm of both polynucleotides, allowing a precise determination of the principal parameters as a function of mono- and divalent salt concentration and pH. Both proteins interact much more strongly (about 2000-fold) with poly[d(A-T)] than with random DNA as expected from the homology with the specific consensus binding site of LexA (CTGTATATATATACAG). For both LexA and its DNA binding domain we find that the interaction with poly[d(A-T)] is cooperative with a cooperativity factor omega of about 50-70 for both proteins over a wide range of solvent conditions, suggesting that the carboxy-terminal domain of LexA is not involved in this type of cooperativity. On the contrary, no cooperativity could be detected for the interaction of the LexA DNA binding domain with a random DNA fragment. The overall binding constant K omega (or simply K in the case of random DNA) depends strongly on the salt concentration as observed for most protein-DNA interactions, but the behavior of LexA is unusual in that the steepness of this salt dependence (delta log K omega/delta log [NaCl]) is much more pronounced at slightly acidic pH values as compared to that at neutral or slightly alkaline pH. The behavior is not easily understood in terms of the current theories on the electrostatic contribution to protein-DNA interactions on the basis of polyelectrolyte theory. A comparison of the overall binding constant K omega of the entire LexA repressor and its DNA binding domain reveals that LexA binds only 20-50-fold stronger under a wide variety of salt and pH conditions. This result tends to demonstrate further that the additional energy due to the dimerization of LexA via the carboxy-terminal domain should be rather weak as expected from the small dimerization constant of LexA (2 X 10(-4) M-1).


Subject(s)
Bacterial Proteins/metabolism , DNA/metabolism , Escherichia coli/metabolism , Poly dA-dT/metabolism , Polydeoxyribonucleotides/metabolism , Repressor Proteins/metabolism , Serine Endopeptidases , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Base Sequence , Circular Dichroism , Kinetics , Mathematics , Molecular Sequence Data , Nucleic Acid Conformation , Peptide Fragments/metabolism , Protein Conformation
2.
FEBS Lett ; 234(1): 56-60, 1988 Jul 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2968919

ABSTRACT

The ability of the isolated carboxy-terminal domain of the LexA repressor of Escherichia coli to form dimers and tetramers has been investigated by equilibrium ultracentrifugation. This domain, that comprises the amino acids 85-202, is readily purified after self-cleavage of the LexA repressor at alkaline pH. It turns out that the carboxy-terminal domain forms dimers and tetramers essentially as the entire LexA repressor. The corresponding association constants were determined after non-linear least squares fitting of the experimental concentration distribution. A dimer association constant of K2 = 3 X 10(4) M-1 and a tetramer association constant of K4 = 2 X 10(4) M-1 have been determined. Similar measurements on the entire LexA repressor [(1985) Biochemistry 24, 2812-2818] gave values of K2 = 2.1 X 10(4) M-1 and K4 = 7.7 X 10(4) M-1. Within experimental error the dimer formation constant of the carboxy-terminal domain may be considered to be the same as that of the entire repressor whereas the isolated domain forms tetramers slightly less efficiently. It should be stressed that the potential error in K4 is higher than that in K2. The overall conclusion is that the two structural domains of LexA have also well-defined functional roles: the amino-terminal domain interacts with DNA and the carboxy-terminal domain is involved in dimerisation reinforcing in this way the binding of the LexA repressor to operator DNA.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Proteins , Escherichia coli/analysis , Serine Endopeptidases , Bacteriophage lambda/analysis , Macromolecular Substances , Repressor Proteins , Ultracentrifugation
3.
EMBO J ; 7(1): 269-75, 1988 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3282882

ABSTRACT

Using hydroxyl radical footprinting and ethylation interference experiments, we have determined the backbone contacts made by the entire LexA repressor and its amino-terminal fragment with the recA operator DNA. These techniques reveal essentially the same contacts between both proteins and one side of the DNA helix if one assumes that the DNA stays in the normal B-conformation. This result is somewhat unexpected because protection of guanine bases against methylation suggested a somewhat twisted recognition surface. The backbone contacts revealed by both methods are symmetrically disposed with respect to the center of the operator, providing further evidence that the operator binds two LexA monomers. Each half-operator contains seven interfering phosphates. These phosphates are found on both sides of the 5'-CTGT sequence that is believed to be the principal recognition target. On the side close to the center of the operator are found two phosphates, whereas the other five are clustered on the side apart from the dyad axis. We are not aware of such an extended cluster of interfering phosphates for any other DNA-binding protein. A quantification of the hydroxyl radical footprints allowed us to compare further the affinity of the LexA repressor for the recA operator with that of its isolated DNA binding domain. We find an only 13-fold higher binding constant for LexA than for its amino-terminal domain, which is in good agreement with our earlier results for the uvrA operator using a completely different binding assay.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Escherichia coli/genetics , Genes, Bacterial , Genes , Operon , Rec A Recombinases/genetics , Repressor Proteins/genetics , Serine Endopeptidases , Transcription Factors/genetics , Alkylation , Bacterial Proteins/metabolism , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , DNA, Bacterial/metabolism , Genes, Regulator , Plasmids , Rec A Recombinases/metabolism , Transferases
4.
J Mol Biol ; 193(2): 293-302, 1987 Jan 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3298658

ABSTRACT

A comparative study of the interaction of the LexA repressor of Escherichia coli and of its amino-terminal DNA binding domain to the uvrA operator has been undertaken. Most of the binding constants are determined from competition experiments with RNA polymerase by measuring the time-course of the abortive initiation transcriptional activity. The presence of repressor increases the lag time, tau, without affecting the final maximum activity. The inhibition of transcription by LexA, at least in the case of the uvrA gene, is thus a transient, time-dependent phenomenon, because once the RNA polymerase is engaged in a stable "open" complex, it is quasi-irreversibly trapped in this state. A study of the binding constants as a function of ionic strength suggests the formation of 5.5(+/- 1) salt bridges between the uvrA operator and a LexA dimer. Surprisingly, the binding affinity of the amino-terminal domain was only about one order of magnitude smaller than that of the entire LexA repressor. The determination of the binding constant of the RNA polymerase to the "closed" uvrA promoter (KB approximately 1 X 10(7) to 2 X 10(7) M-1) allowed us to determine theoretical repression curves for the two repressor species. These calculations show that the binding constant found for LexA is sufficiently high to account for substantial or complete repression, and that of the amino-terminal domain is sufficiently low to account for partial or nearly full induction. Under solvent conditions used by others for the determination of binding constants to other SOS operators by DNAase I footprinting, the uvrA operator turns out to be a rather weak one (K approximately 3 X 10(7) M-1), being comparable with that of the uvrB gene. The uvrA promoter is "association-limited" with a KB X k2 product fitting very nicely the homology score for the promoter of 55.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Proteins/genetics , DNA, Bacterial/genetics , Escherichia coli/genetics , Gene Expression Regulation , Genes, Bacterial , Promoter Regions, Genetic , Repressor Proteins/genetics , Serine Endopeptidases , Transcription Factors/genetics , Binding Sites , Deoxyribonuclease I , Kinetics , Transcription, Genetic
5.
EMBO J ; 5(4): 793-8, 1986 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-3709524

ABSTRACT

Both the amino-terminal and the carboxy-terminal domain of the LexA repressor have been purified using the LexA protein autodigestion reaction at alkaline pH, which leads to the same specific products as the physiological RecA-catalyzed proteolysis of repressor. We show by circular dichroism (c.d) that, upon non-specific binding to DNA, the purified amino-terminal domain induces a very similar if not identical conformational change of the DNA as does the entire repressor. The positive c.d. signal increases approximately 3-fold if the DNA lattice is fully saturated with protein. Further, the amino-terminal domain of the LexA protein binds specifically to the operator of the recA gene, producing qualitatively the same effects on the methylation pattern of the guanine bases by dimethylsulfate as the entire repressor, consisting of a methylation inhibition effect at four distal operator guanines and a slight enhancement at the central bases. The spacing between these contacts suggests that LexA does not bind to the operator along the same face of the DNA helix. As shown by c.d. studies the amino-terminal domain harbours a substantial amount of residues in alpha-helical conformation, a prerequisite for DNA recognition via a helix--turn--helix structural motif as proposed for many other regulatory proteins.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Proteins/metabolism , Plasmids , Repressor Proteins/metabolism , Serine Endopeptidases , Transcription Factors/metabolism , Bacterial Proteins/isolation & purification , Base Composition , Base Sequence , Circular Dichroism , DNA, Bacterial/metabolism , Nucleic Acid Conformation , Peptide Fragments/isolation & purification , Protein Binding , Protein Conformation
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...