Pediatric Provider Education and Use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception in Adolescents.

INTRODUCTION: Pediatric primary care providers prescribe the majority of contraception to adolescents, but they often lack training in long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). Our objective was to assess whether a provider education initiative was associated with a change in LARC use for adolescents. METHOD: Using electronic medical records, we examined LARC use for 7,331 women ages 15 to 21 years with an established primary care provider before and after a provider education initiative on LARC. We used an interrupted time series design to examine trends in LARC use related to the intervention. RESULTS: Before the intervention, 3.4% to 3.8% of adolescents were using a LARC method, and LARC use was declining by 4 devices/10,000 adolescents per month (95% confidence interval = [-5, -2] per 10,000 adolescents). After the intervention, LARC use stabilized. The number of adolescents using a LARC method increased nonsignificantly at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the intervention. DISCUSSION: Education of pediatric primary care providers reversed a trend toward decreased use of long-acting reversible contraception.

Provider and Health System Factors Associated with Usage of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception in Adolescents.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is recommended as first-line contraception for adolescents. Surveys of primary care providers suggest that physician and clinic factors might influence LARC counseling, but their effect on usage is unknown. Our objective was to explore provider and clinic characteristics associated with LARC usage in adolescents. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTIONS, AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 5363 women ages 15-21 years receiving primary care within a large health system in Massachusetts in 2015. We used data abstracted from electronic medical records to characterize rates of LARC usage. We analyzed the association of provider (specialty, degree, gender, resident status, LARC credentialing) and clinic (Title X funding, onsite LARC provision, onsite obstetrician-gynecologist) factors with adolescents' LARC usage using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall, 3.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.9-3.9) of adolescents were documented as currently using a LARC method. Older adolescents were significantly more likely to use a LARC method (adjusted odds ratio, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.62-3.58 for women ages 20-21 years compared with ages 15-17 years). Adolescents whose primary care provider was a resident were significantly more likely to use a LARC method (adjusted odds ratio, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.02-2.68). Provider specialty, degree, gender, onsite LARC provision, and onsite obstetrician-gynecologist were not significantly associated with LARC usage in adolescents. CONCLUSION: Being older and having a primary care provider early in their training increased the odds of LARC usage among adolescents in a large Massachusetts health system. Across primary care specialties, educating providers about the appropriate uses of LARC methods in nulliparous adolescents might facilitate LARC usage.

Bag free in the Bay State.

BACKGROUND: The deleterious effect of formula company-sponsored discharge bags on breastfeeding is well established. As of July 2012, all 49 maternity facilities in Massachusetts had banned these bags, making it the second "bag-free" state in the United States. Obstacles to changing this long-standing practice were numerous, including concerns regarding the cost of a substitute gift. This study was designed to describe what practices maternity facilities in Massachusetts have adopted in place of giving out a formula company-sponsored discharge bag. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Maternity facilities in Massachusetts were surveyed regarding discharge gift practices. Information was collected regarding gifts given and cost. RESULTS: The response rate was 100%. Fifty-nine percent of the facilities replaced the formula company-sponsored bag with their own gift bag carrying the hospital's logo. Bags were either given empty or contained educational materials and/or a gift such as a T-shirt, hat, or baby book. Fourteen percent of the facilities gave a gift that did not include a bag. Twenty-seven percent of facilities gave no gift. Cost of the gifts ranged from $1 to $35, with a mean cost of $10.67. The hospital budget was used to partially or fully fund 58% of gifts; 22% were covered in part by donations. CONCLUSIONS: Although most maternity facilities surveyed replaced the formula company-sponsored discharge bag with a different gift, one-quarter gave no replacement. These data indicate that discontinuing discharge gifts can be a readily accepted, cost-neutral step toward evidence-based breastfeeding best practice.