Incomprehensible treatment of retinoblastoma with high doses of vitamin C.

PURPOSES: To inform about a case of neglected retinoblastoma that was left untreated for more than 3 years by parents. During this time period the local finding worsened from endophytic retinoblastoma group B according IIRC (ABC classification) to extraorbital propagation. BACKGROUND: Retinoblastoma is the most common intraocular tumor in childhood, that occurs approximately in 1 : 15-20 000 births worldwide. In European region cases of extraocular propagation are very infrequent. Extraorbital propagation is extremely rare in middle and high income countries. METHODS: We report the preoperative ophthalmological findings, MRI imaging, treatment methods and postoperative results of this case. RESULTS: After initial dose of six courses of chemotherapy patient underwent surgery (orbital exenteration). In postoperative period patient received two more courses of chemotherapy. In spite of progressed stage of the disease, we obtained good results with our therapy. CONCLUSIONS: We suppose that good treatment results, in spite of extraordinary long lag interval and hopeless pretreatment condition, caused by alternative therapy with high doses vitamin C and no protein intake, were caused by therapeutic naïve retinoblastoma with an absence of RB1 gene mutation (Fig. 6, Ref. 7).

[Treatment Refusal in Pediatric Oncology]. / Odmietnutie liecby v detskej onkológii.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric oncologists are often faced with situations in which parents or guardians refuse recommended treatment for curable childhood cancer. Deciding how to proceed in such situations is an ethical dilemma. The aim of this article is to consider optimal approaches when parents are strongly against oncological treatment, potentially compromising their childrens rights for health care and to the chance for cure. CASES: In this paper, we report two cases of treatment refusal from our department and the impact of such decisions on the children themselves. Case no. 1 describes a child with retinoblastoma whose parents refused standard treatment in order to seek alternative treatment abroad. Case no. 2 describes a patient with a primary lymphoma of bone who received treatment by a court order after parental refusal. CONCLUSION: When parents refuse a treatment for potentially curable cancer, the medical team often focuses on the certainty of death without treatment. In the background, there is a smaller but still significant risk that - even if the treatment is eventually accepted or compelled - the child will still die from treatment-related complications or refractory disease, possibly with considerable suffering. The reasons for refusing a treatment vary. The entire medical team is tasked with trying to respectfully understand the reasoning behind the parents unwillingness to accept the treatment, in order to address all possible misunderstandings and to propose solutions that could be acceptable for the parents. In some situations however, it is necessary to resolve the dilemma by legal means in order to protect the life of the child.Key words: oncology - ethics - decision making - treatment refusal - legal guardians The authors declare they have no potential conflicts of interest concerning drugs, products, or services used in the study. The Editorial Board declares that the manuscript met the ICMJE recommendation for biomedical papers.Submitted: 7. 8. 2017Accepted: 7. 9. 2017.

[Embryonal Tumors with Multilayer Rosettes--Rare Central Nervous System Tumors in Infants]. / Embryonálne tumory s mnohovrstvovými rozetami--vzácne tumory centrálneho nervového systému v detskom veku.

INTRODUCTION: The most recent findings show a histopathological, genetic and clinical uniformity in cases of tumors called embryonal tumors with multilayer rosettes. This group is composed of medulloepithelioma, ependymoblastoma and embryonal tumor with abundant neuropil and true rosettes. Amplification of locus 19q13.42, which includes C19MC cluster containing genes for microRNA, and also LIN28A positivity are present in all three entities. Dysregulation of epigenetic modifiers is very important in pathogenesis of the disease. These tumors manifest in little children (median less than 3 years of age); overall survival is 5-10%. CASE REPORT: Almost three year-old boy diagnosed with brainstem tumor: meduloepithelioma, WHO grade IV confirmed by histological investigation. He presented with dysarthria, bulbar syndrome, central lesion of the facial nerve, quadriparesis with right-side dominancy. He received three induction cycles of chemotherapy from March to May 2014 (according to protocol COG ACNS0334). Only partial improvement of his clinical state was reached. Signs of an intracranial hypertension appeared resulting in VP shunt insertion; impairment of consciousness developed after the induction cycles and before any other treatment could be initiated. He underwent radiotherapy due to vital indication. After application of two fractions (boost in the center of the tumor), the patient became quickly comatose. Spinal cord metastasis was demarked by MRI scan (in the level of 3rd cervical vertebra). A bilateral infiltration in pulmonary parenchyma, according to a radiologist metastasis-wise, was detected by CT scan (histologisation of infiltration was not implemented). The patient died in August 2014--six months after manifestation of first symptoms. CONCLUSION: We reported our first documented case of a patient with tumor from embryonal tumors with multilayer rosettes group in Slovakia. Nowadays, there is no effective treatment of these tumors. Research of molecules targeting to epigenetic modifiers would be one of the possible promises for future therapy.

Clustering of mutations in the 5' tertile of the NF1 gene in Slovakia patients with optic pathway glioma.

Optic pathway gliomas (OPG) occur in 15% of patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1; OMIM 162200). Genotype-phenotype correlations in patients with NF1 may help to determine the risk group for developing complications such as OPG in coincidence with other NF1.features. We evaluated 52 patients with NF1 (25 with OPG and 27 without OPG). All subjects underwent a clinical examination focused on neurofibromatosis type 1 and molecular diagnostics of NF1 gene using protocol based on RNA analysis confirming the diagnosis of NF1. In the group with OPG patients, there was a significantly higher incidence of freckling (P=0.017), neurofibromatosis bright objects (NBO) (P=0.0038), compared to the group without OPG. The differences between the groups with respect to Lisch nodules were on the borderline of statistical significance (P=0.088). The frequency of neurofibromas in the group with OPG was not significant (P=0.9). From all patients with the mutation localized in the first tertile of the NF1 gene majority (71%) had optic glioma compared to individuals who didn't have the OPG 29% (P=0.0049). Our results present the clustering of mutations in the 5'tertile of NF1 gene in patients with optic nerve glioma and suggest higher incidence of freckling and neurofibromatosis brain objects in these patients. Molecular analysis of NF1 gene is important part in complex management of NF1 patients and contributes to a better understanding of clinical picture of NF1 patients. .