Clinical Utility of Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging and Real-Time Quantification of Bowel Perfusion in Minimally Invasive Left-Sided Colorectal Resections.

BACKGROUND: Left-sided colorectal surgery demonstrates high anastomotic leak rates, with tissue ischemia thought to influence outcomes. Indocyanine green is commonly used for perfusion assessment, but evidence remains mixed for whether it reduces colorectal anastomotic leaks. Laser speckle contrast imaging provides dye-free perfusion assessment in real-time through perfusion heat maps and quantification. OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the efficacy of advanced visualization (indocyanine green versus laser speckle contrast imaging), perfusion assessment, and utility of laser speckle perfusion quantification in determining ischemic margins. DESIGN: Prospective intervention group using advanced visualization with case-matched, retrospective control group. SETTINGS: Single academic medical center. PATIENTS: Forty adult patients undergoing elective, minimally invasive, left-sided colorectal surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Intraoperative perfusion assessment using white light imaging and advanced visualization at 3 time points: T1-proximal colon after devascularization, before transection, T2-proximal/distal colon before anastomosis, and T3-completed anastomosis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraoperative indication of ischemic line of demarcation before resection under each visualization method, surgical decision change using advanced visualization, post hoc laser speckle perfusion quantification of colorectal tissue, and 30-day postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Advanced visualization changed surgical decision-making in 17.5% of cases. For cases in which surgeons changed a decision, the average discordance between the line of demarcation in white light imaging and advanced visualization was 3.7 cm, compared to 0.41 cm ( p = 0.01) for cases without decision changes. There was no statistical difference between the line of ischemic demarcation using laser speckle versus indocyanine green ( p = 0.16). Laser speckle quantified lower perfusion values for tissues beyond the line of ischemic demarcation while suggesting an additional 1 cm of perfused tissue beyond this line. One (2.5%) anastomotic leak occurred in the intervention group. LIMITATIONS: This study was not powered to detect differences in anastomotic leak rates. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced visualization using laser speckle and indocyanine green provides valuable perfusion information that impacts surgical decision-making in minimally invasive left-sided colorectal surgeries. See Video Abstract . UTILIDAD CLNICA DE LAS IMGENES DE CONTRASTE MOTEADO CON LSER Y LA CUANTIFICACIN EN TIEMPO REAL DE LA PERFUSIN INTESTINAL EN RESECCIONES COLORRECTALES DEL LADO IZQUIERDO MNIMAMENTE INVASIVAS: ANTECEDENTES:La cirugía colorrectal del lado izquierdo demuestra altas tasas de fuga anastomótica, y se cree que la isquemia tisular influye en los resultados. El verde de indocianina se utiliza habitualmente para evaluar la perfusión, pero la evidencia sobre si reduce las fugas anastomóticas colorrectales sigue siendo contradictoria. Las imágenes de contraste moteado con láser proporcionan una evaluación de la perfusión sin colorantes en tiempo real a través de mapas de calor de perfusión y cuantificación.OBJETIVO:Este estudio investiga la eficacia de la evaluación de la perfusión mediante visualización avanzada (verde de indocianina versus imágenes de contraste moteado con láser) y la utilidad de la cuantificación de la perfusión con moteado láser para determinar los márgenes isquémicos.DISEÑO:Grupo de intervención prospectivo que utiliza visualización avanzada con un grupo de control retrospectivo de casos emparejados.LUGARES:Centro médico académico único.PACIENTES:Cuarenta pacientes adultos sometidos a cirugía colorrectal electiva, mínimamente invasiva, del lado izquierdo.INTERVENCIONES:Evaluación de la perfusión intraoperatoria mediante imágenes con luz blanca y visualización avanzada en tres puntos temporales: T1-colon proximal después de la devascularización, antes de la transección; T2-colon proximal/distal antes de la anastomosis; y T3-anastomosis completa.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:Indicación intraoperatoria de la línea de demarcación isquémica antes de la resección bajo cada método de visualización, cambio de decisión quirúrgica mediante visualización avanzada, cuantificación post-hoc de la perfusión con láser moteado del tejido colorrectal y resultados posoperatorios a los 30 días.RESULTADOS:La visualización avanzada cambió la toma de decisiones quirúrgicas en el 17,5% de los casos. Para los casos en los que los cirujanos cambiaron una decisión, la discordancia promedio entre la línea de demarcación en las imágenes con luz blanca y la visualización avanzada fue de 3,7 cm, en comparación con 0,41 cm (p = 0,01) para los casos sin cambios de decisión. No hubo diferencias estadísticas entre la línea de demarcación isquémica utilizando láser moteado versus verde de indocianina (p = 0,16). El moteado con láser cuantificó valores de perfusión más bajos para los tejidos más allá de la línea de demarcación isquémica y al mismo tiempo sugirió 1 cm adicional de tejido perfundido más allá de esta línea. Se produjo una fuga anastomótica (2,5%) en el grupo de intervención.LIMITACIONES:Este estudio no tuvo el poder estadístico suficiente para detectar diferencias en las tasas de fuga anastomótica.CONCLUSIONES:La visualización avanzada utilizando moteado láser y verde de indocianina proporciona información valiosa sobre la perfusión que impacta la toma de decisiones quirúrgicas en cirugías colorrectales mínimamente invasivas del lado izquierdo. (Traducción-Dr. Ingrid Melo).

Colonic intussusception masquerading as diverticulitis: a case report of a 31 year old diagnosed with colorectal carcinoma after multiple presentations to the ED for episodes of acute diverticulitis.

Colonic intussusception is a rare occurrence in adults, with few reported cases in the literature. Patients often present with nonspecific and vague symptoms leading to diagnostic challenges and delayed treatment. Given the high incidence of underlying malignancy associated with cases of adult intussusception, it is important for clinicians to be able to recognize and coordinate appropriate follow-up. A 31-year-old female presented to the emergency department four times over a month with left lower quadrant abdominal pain. Multiple computed tomography scans showed inflammation and diverticulitis of the mid-descending colon along with a short segment of colonic intussusception. A colonoscopy was performed due to concern for malignancy. A partially obstructing mass was found in the descending colon that could not be traversed. Biopsies revealed necrosis and no evidence of malignancy. However, given high suspicion for malignancy, the patient underwent a laparoscopic left colectomy, which revealed a pT3N1b colon adenocarcinoma.

Compliance with preoperative care measures reduces surgical site infection after colorectal operation.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are a major cause of morbidity complicating colorectal operations. Several evidence-based preoperative strategies are associated with decreased SSI rates. We hypothesize that compliance with multiple strategies is associated with lower incidence of SSI after the elective colorectal operation. METHODS: Preoperative care measure compliance before colorectal operations were assessed. Measures included antiseptic wash the night before and day of operation, oral antibiotic, and mechanical bowel preparation, antibiotic prophylaxis, Chloraprep skin preparation, and hair clipping. Rates of SSI after colectomy and other pertinent outcomes were stratified by full and partial compliance with preoperative measures. Exclusion criteria included bowel perforation, ischemia, complete obstruction, intra-abdominal abscess, and no intraoperative skin closure. RESULTS: Eight hundred twenty-six subjects underwent colectomy between 2010 and 2016; 469 met inclusion criteria. Compliance with all measures occurred in 214 (46%) and was independently associated with lower postoperative infection rates (odds ratio [OR], 0.37; confidence interval [CI], 0.16-0.85; P = 0.02). SSI occurred in 51 (11%): was superficial in 35 (7%); deep in 5 (1%); and organ space in 11 (2%). SSI rates were reduced from 16% (partial or no compliance group) to 5% (full compliance group). No stand-alone intervention was independently associated with decreased SSI rate. Multivariate analysis found the following factors associated with a lower risk of SSI: full compliance with all five process measures, lower BMI, nonsmoker, and minimally invasive operation. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Compliance with preoperative care strategies reduces rates of SSI after colectomy with a cumulative effect more pronounced than any single intervention reinforcing the need for protocol-driven and evidence-based care for patients undergoing colorectal operations.

A risk score model of 30-day readmission in ulcerative colitis after colectomy or proctectomy.

INTRODUCTION: The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services established 30-day readmission rate as a key metric in measuring high-value, cost-conscious care; therefore, our aim is to develop a risk score for 30-day readmission in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients undergoing colectomy or proctectomy. METHODS: This study used data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) participant user file (2011-2015). Patients with UC undergoing colectomy or proctectomy were identified using ICD-9, 10, and CPT codes. Stepwise multivariate analyses were used to determine risk factors associated with readmission including pre-operative conditions, laboratory results, operative variables, and post-operative complications. For readmission risk score assessment, a weighted logistic regression model was built and validated using ACS NSQIP 2011-2014 and 2015 data, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 4797 patients were included with 963 (20%) patients readmitted within 30 days. Potentially modifiable risk factors included deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, renal insufficiency, wound infection, urinary tract infection, sepsis/septic shock, and pre-existing congestive heart failure. Ten percent of patients with a risk score between 0 and 9 were readmitted, 18.5% with a score between 10 and 19, 52.2% with a score between 20 and 29, and 59.6% in patients with a risk score >29. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple potentially preventable risk factors are associated with 30-day readmission following colectomy or proctectomy in UC patients. Higher risk scores are associated with increased risk of unplanned readmission.

Defining payments associated with the treatment of colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: While bundled payments aim to reduce variations in health care spending across the continuum of care, data reporting on variations in payments for privately insured patients undergoing treatment for colon cancer (CC) are lacking. The current study sought to characterize variations in payments received for the treatment of CC using a cohort of commercially insured patients. METHODS: Patients who underwent a colectomy for CC were identified using the MarketScan Database for 2010-2014. Multivariable regression analysis was used to calculate and compare risk-adjusted payments between patients. RESULTS: A total of 18,337 patients were identified who met inclusion criteria. The median risk-adjusted payment for surgery was $26,408 (IQR: $19,193-$38,037) ranging from $19,762 (IQR: $15,595-$25,636) among patients in the lowest quartile of payments to $33,809 (IQR: $24,783-$48,254) for patients in the highest (+△71.1%). The median risk-adjusted payment for chemotherapy was $70,090 (IQR: $57,813-$83,216); compared with patients in the lowest quartile of payments, payments associated with chemotherapy were 40.4% higher among patients in the highest quartile of payments (Q1 versus Q4: $56,827 [IQR: 49,173-65,353] versus $79,801 [IQR: 67,270-90,999]). When stratified by treatment type, patients in the highest two quartiles of risk-adjusted payments accounted for a total of 58.5% of all payments, whereas patients in the lower two quartiles of risk-adjusted payments accounted for only 41.5% of all payments. A younger patient age, increasing patient comorbidity and undergoing an open operation were associated with higher overall payments. CONCLUSIONS: Wide variations in payments exist for the treatment for colon cancer. Episode-based bundle payments for surgery and chemotherapy may differentially impact reimbursement for CC.

Effect of surgeon "experience" with laparoscopy on postoperative outcomes after colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Although the relationship between laparoscopic surgery and improved clinical outcomes has been well established across a variety of procedures, the effect of operative experience with laparoscopic surgery remains less defined. The present study sought to assess the comparative benefit of laparoscopic colorectal surgery relative to surgeon volume. METHODS: Commercially insured patients aged 18 to 64 years undergoing a colorectal resection were identified using the MarketScan Database from 2010-2014. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to calculate and compare postoperative mortality/morbidity by operative approach relative to surgeon volume. RESULTS: A total of 21,827 patients were identified who met inclusion criteria. The median age among patients was 53 years (interquartile range: 46-59) with a slight majority of patients being female (n = 11,248, 51.5%). Laparoscopic operations were performed in 49.2% of patients (n = 10,756), whereas 50.7% (n = 11,071) underwent an open colorectal resection. On multivariable analysis, laparoscopic surgery was associated with 64% decreased odds of developing a postoperative complication or mortality (odds ratio = 0.36, 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.41, P < .001). Patients who underwent colectomy performed by a higher operative volume surgeon (high versus low: odds ratio = 0.68, 95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.77, P < .001) demonstrated decreased odds of developing a postoperative complication/mortality. Interestingly the potential decrease in risk-adjusted morbidity/mortality between laparoscopic and open surgery was somewhat greater among high-operative-volume surgeons (odds ratio = 0.29, 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.34, P < .001) and intermediate-operative-volume surgeons (odds ratio = 0.30, 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.36, P < .001) compared with low-operative-volume surgeons (odds ratio = 0.36, 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.41, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Although laparoscopic surgery was associated with improved postoperative clinical outcomes, the effect of laparoscopic surgery varied somewhat according to surgeon volume.

Late stomal complications.

Ostomy creation is a common surgical procedure performed by a variety of surgical specialties. Complications associated with stomas are frequent and run the gamut from technical, mechanical, physiologic, and psychologic. The impact of these complications ranges from simple inconvenience to life threatening. The majority of these complications may not occur for years following creation of the stoma. In this article, the author reviews many of the late complications associated with stomas and options regarding their management.