The effect of surgeon experience on the detection of metastatic lymph nodes in the central compartment and the pathologic features of clinically unapparent metastatic lymph nodes: what are we missing when we don't perform a prophylactic dissection of central compartment lymph nodes in papillary thyroid cancer?

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic central neck dissection (PCND) for papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) is controversial. Recent publications suggest that the number and size of nodes and the presence of extranodal extension (ENE) are important features for risk stratification of lymph node metastases. We analyzed these features in clinically unapparent nodes that would not otherwise be removed. We also investigated the impact of surgeon experience on the ability to detect metastatic lymph nodes intraoperatively. METHODS: Forty-seven patients with well-differentiated PTC, with no preoperative evidence of central metastases, were included in this study. Intraoperatively, clinically apparent disease was determined by inspection and palpation by the senior surgeon and a fellow/senior resident, and recorded in a blinded fashion. Rate of occult metastases based on intraoperative evaluation were tabulated for each group of surgeons. Histopathologic features of occult nodes were analyzed to determine what clinicians would be missing by foregoing a PCND, and how that would have impacted the patient management. RESULTS: The rate of occult metastases, based on senior surgeon assessment, was 26%, and did not differ significantly from fellow/senior resident assessment. The level of agreement between these two surgeon groups was moderate (k=0.665). Analysis of the false negative cases revealed that the size of the largest undetected node ranged from 0.1 to 1.3 cm; 36% of patients with occult metastases demonstrated five or more positive nodes, and 27% showed ENE. DISCUSSION: Clinical assessment based on intraoperative inspection and palpation had poor sensitivity and specificity in identifying metastatic central nodes, regardless of the level of experience of the surgeon. There was moderate agreement between surgeons of different experience levels. Sensitivity improved significantly with larger size of positive nodes, but not with the presence of multiple positive nodes or presence of ENE. In foregoing PCND in this patient population, our results suggest that treating clinicians miss potentially virulent disease with a large number of occult positive central nodes and occult nodes with ENE. This is the first report to address the pathologic features of clinically nonevident central nodes showing a high incidence of clinically relevant, adverse histologic features, as well as the impact of surgeon experience in performing the important intraoperative determination of whether there are clinically evident nodes that require removal.

A survey of variables used by speech-language pathologists to assess function and predict functional recovery in oral cancer patients.

Oromotor and clinical swallow assessments are routinely performed by speech-language pathologists (SLPs) who see head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. However, the tools used to assess some of these variables vary. SLPs routinely identify and quantify abnormal functioning in order to rehabilitate the patient. However, function in terms of tongue range of motion (ROM) is typically described using a subjective severity rating scale. The primary objective of this study was to gain insight via survey into what variables SLPs consider important in assessing and documenting function after HNC treatment. A second objective was to seek feedback regarding a scale designed by the authors for assessing tongue ROM for this cohort of patients. This survey also was developed to elucidate salient factors that might have an impact on the prognosis for speech and swallow outcomes. Of the 1,816 SLPs who were sent the survey, 292 responded who work with HNC patients. Results revealed that although 95 % of SLPs assess tongue strength, only 13 % use instrumental methods. Although 98 % assess tongue ROM, 88 % estimate ROM based on clinical assessment. The majority of respondents agreed with the utility of the proposed tongue ROM rating scale. Several variables were identified by respondents as having an impact on overall prognosis for speech and swallow functioning. Tracking progress and change in function with treatment can be accomplished only with measurable assessment techniques. Furthermore, a consistent measuring system can benefit patients with other diagnoses that affect lingual mobility and strength.

Tongue strength as a predictor of functional outcomes and quality of life after tongue cancer surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Surgical resection of oral cancer can result in altered speech, swallowing, and quality of life (QOL). To date, the oral outcome variables of tongue strength, tongue and jaw range of motion, and saliva production have not been extensively assessed. This pilot study was done to assess tongue strength along with other oral outcomes and their relationship to performance status for speech, swallowing, and QOL after partial glossectomy. Our aim was to create a norm for what should be considered a normal tongue strength value in this population. We hypothesized that patients with tongue strength of 30 kPa or greater would perform better on the performance status scale and various QOL measures than do patients with tongue strength of less than 30 kPa. METHODS: We used a cross-sectional design in this study. The postoperative assessment included 1) Performance Status Scale and Karnofsky Performance Status Scale; 2) oral outcome variables of tongue strength, jaw range of motion. and saliva production; and 3) patient-rated QOL ratings via Eating Assessment Tool, M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory, EORTC-H&N35, and Speech Handicap Index. RESULTS: Patients with tongue strength of at least 30 kPa performed better on the performance status scales and various QOL measures. The cutoff score of 30 kPa for tongue strength measures revealed a trend in predicting performance on the scales and QOL measures. CONCLUSIONS: The oral outcome variables correlated with performance status for speech, swallowing, and QOL. We propose a norm for tongue strength in this population, based on the trend seen in this group of patients, as none previously existed. Future studies are under way that incorporate a larger sample size to further validate this norm. Future studies will also examine oral functional outcome measures in a larger population by inclu'ding other oral and oropharyngeal sites to help predict speech and swallow performance status and QOL.