Methods for Biomechanical Testing of Posterior Malleolar Fractures in Ankle Fractures: A Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of posterior malleolar fractures (PMFs) is debated, including the need for surgery and method of fixation. Recent literature has suggested that fracture pattern, rather than fragment size, may be an important predictor for ankle biomechanics and functional outcome. Biomechanical studies have been conducted to provide evidence-based treatment on the effects of fracture and fixation on contact pressure and stability. The objective of this scoping review is to summarize the methodologies used in biomechanical studies on PMFs and assess whether they are sufficient to test the need for surgery and method of fixation. METHODS: A scoping review of publications before January 2022 was performed. PubMed/Medline and Embase Ovid were searched for cadaver or finite element analysis (FEA) studies that created and tested the effects of PMFs in ankle fractures. Both cadaver and FEA studies were included. Data about fragment characteristics, mode of testing, and outcomes were charted by 2 persons from the study group. The data were synthesized when possible and compared. RESULTS: We included 25 biomechanical studies, including 19 cadaver studies, 5 FEA studies, and 1 cadaver and FEA study. Aside from the fragment size, few other fragment characteristics were reported. Mode of testing varied with different loads and foot positions. Strong conclusions on the effects of fracture and fixation on contact pressure and stability could not be made. CONCLUSION: Biomechanical studies on PMFs demonstrate wide variability in fragment characteristics and mode of testing, which makes it difficult to compare studies and draw conclusions on the need for surgery and method of fixation. Additionally, limited reporting of fragment measurements questions the applicability to clinical practice. The biomechanical literature on PMFs would benefit from the use of a standard classification and universal fragment measurements to match clinical injuries in future biomechanical studies. Based on this review, we recommend the Mason classification, which addresses the pathomechanism, and use of the following fragment measurements in all 3 anatomic planes when creating and describing PMFs: fragment length ratio, axial angle, sagittal angle or fragment height, and interfragmentary angle. The testing protocol needs to reflect the purpose of the study. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This scoping review demonstrates wide methodological diversity of biomechanical studies. Consistency in methodology should enable comparison of study results, leading to stronger evidence-based recommendations to guide surgeons in decision making and offer PMF patients the best treatment.

Higher complication rate after nail compared with plate fixation of ankle fractures in patients aged 60 years or older: a prospective, randomized controlled trial.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to compare the functional and radiological outcomes and the complication rate after nail and plate fixation of unstable fractures of the ankle in elderly patients. METHODS: In this multicentre study, 120 patients aged ≥ 60 years with an acute unstable AO/OTA type 44-B fracture of the ankle were randomized to fixation with either a nail or a plate and followed for 24 months after surgery. The primary outcome measure was the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot score. Secondary outcome measures were the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire, the Olerud and Molander Ankle score, the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire, a visual analogue score for pain, complications, the quality of reduction of the fracture, nonunion, and the development of osteoarthritis. RESULTS: At 24 months, the median AOFAS score was equivalent in the two groups (nail 90 (interquartile range (IQR) 82 to 100), plate 95 (IQR 87 to 100), p = 0.478). There were statistically more complications and secondary operations after nail than plate fixation (p = 0.024 and p = 0.028, respectively). There were no other significant differences in the outcomes between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The functional outcome after nail and plate fixation was equivalent; however, the complication rate and number of secondary operations was significantly higher after nail fixation. These results suggest that plate fixation should usually be the treatment of choice for unstable ankle fractures in the elderly.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(1):72-81.

Intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures in polytraumatized patients. a longitudinal, prospective and observational study of the procedure-related impact on cardiopulmonary- and inflammatory responses.

BACKGROUND: Early intramedullary nailing (IMN) of long bone fractures in severely injured patients has been evaluated as beneficial, but has also been associated with increased inflammation, multi organ failure (MOF) and morbidity. This study was initiated to evaluate the impact of primary femoral IMN on coagulation-, fibrinolysis-, inflammatory- and cardiopulmonary responses in polytraumatized patients. METHODS: Twelve adult polytraumatized patients with femoral shaft fractures were included. Serial blood samples were collected to evaluate coagulation-, fibrinolytic-, and cytokine activation in arterial blood. A flow-directed pulmonary artery (PA) catheter was inserted prior to IMN. Cardiopulmonary function parameters were recorded peri- and postoperatively. The clinical course of the patients and complications were monitored and recorded daily. RESULTS: Mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 31 ± 2.6. No procedure-related effect of the primary IMN on coagulation- and fibrinolysis activation was evident. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) increased significantly from 6 hours post procedure to peak levels on the third postoperative day. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) increased from the first to the third postoperative day. Interleukin-10 (IL-10) peaked on the first postoperative day. A procedure-related transient hemodynamic response was observed on indexed pulmonary vascular resistance (PVRI) two hours post procedure. 11/12 patients developed systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), 7/12 pneumonia, 3/12 acute lung injury (ALI), 3/12 adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), 3/12 sepsis, 0/12 wound infection. CONCLUSION: In the polytraumatized patients with femoral shaft fractures operated with primary IMN we observed a substantial response related to the initial trauma. We could not demonstrate any major additional IMN-related impact on the inflammatory responses or on the cardiopulmonary function parameters. These results have to be interpreted carefully due to the relatively few patients included. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00981877.