Prevalence of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in clinical samples.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence of these resistant strains in the overall isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) in hospital settings. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted from November 2020 to November 2021. The identification and antibiotic susceptibility testing were performed using standard laboratory methods according to the EUCAST standards. The detection of ESBL and carbapenemase production was performed using phenotypic methods such as E-test, combined-disk test with various inhibitors (ROSCO Diagnostica A/S), chromogenic medium for the detection of ESBL/carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) isolates, and the VITEK 2 Compact system (BioMerieux). RESULTS: 944 isolates of K. pneumoniae were detected in various clinical specimens. Among these, ESBL-producing strains were detected in 349/944 (37%), whereas carbapenem- resistant strains in 188/944 (20%) of the isolates. The remaining isolates (407/944 [43%]) belonged to the wild type. ESBL isolates were the most common in wound swabs (138 [39.5%]), whereas CRKP isolates in screening samples (110 [58.5%]). The majority of ESBL isolates were detected in surgical departments (105 [30.1%]), whereas CRKP isolates in adult intensive care unit departments (79 [42.%]). CONCLUSION: Our results show an increasing frequency of CRKP strains. This presents a significant issue in terms of infection prevention and control in hospital settings.

Performance Characteristics and Utility of the Standard Q COVID-19 Antigen Test for Emergency Admissions to Healthcare Facilities.

This study evaluated the performance of the COVID-19 Ag-RDT compared to the real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (rtRT-PCR) for SARS-CoV-2 detection and its use among patients referred for emergency admission. A total of 120 nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from patients referred for emergency admission and immediately preceded for testing to the Unit of Clinical Microbiology. Out of 60 Ag positive tests, 53 (88.3%) were confirmed by rtRT-PCR, while 7 (11.7%) tested negative (false positives). Out of 60 Ag negative tests, 56 (93.3%) were confirmed negative by rtRT-PCR, and 4 (6.7%) were positive (false negatives). Ct value comparison was performed for 53 samples that were positive by both methods: 8 (15.1%) isolates had Ct value up to 20; 37 (69.8%) 21 to 30 and 8 (15.1%) 31 to 40, respectively. The sensitivity of the analyzed rapid Ag test was 92.9%, and specificity 88.9%. The accuracy of the Ag test was 90.8%. This study has shown that rapid Ag tests can be used in emergency admissions to healthcare facilities. However, rtRT-PCR should be considered after negative antigen test results in symptomatic patients, and after positive antigen test results in asymptomatic persons.