Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Clin Densitom ; 26(1): 36-44, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36372621

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Describe fracture risk assessment practices among physicians treating osteoporosis in a real-life setting. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study in a tertiary academic center. Inclusion criteria involved adults (aged ≥18 years) who received minimum adequate therapy (bisphosphates, raloxifene, or denosumab ≥ 3 years or teriparatide ≥ 18 months). Of 1,814 charts randomly selected and reviewed, 274 patients met the inclusion criteria. Risk stratification tools included fragility fractures, Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA), and fracture risk assessment using the FRAX tool. Fracture risk assessment was performed before therapy initiation (N= 274) and at the time of institution of the drug holiday (N=119). High-risk patients were defined as the presence of a fragility fracture, T-score ≤-2.5, or a high-risk score by FRAX calculation. FRAX scores were independently calculated by the research team for comparison and assessment purposes. RESULTS: Before initiation of therapy (N=274) versus upon starting a drug holiday (DH; N=119), 29.9% versus 3.4% had a history of fragility fractures (P<0.001), 58.8% versus 67.2% had a DXA scan performed (P>0.05), 10.5% versus 10.9% of physicians calculated a FRAX score (P>0.05), and 71.5% versus 66.4% were considered at high risk and eligible for therapy. A DXA scan was performed after DH in 40.2% of these patients and at least once in 95.3% of the entire cohort. CONCLUSION: The reporting of FRAX score in DXA scan reports may significantly increase its utilization in fracture risk assessment. We recommend comprehensive fracture risk assessment utilizing history of prevalent osteoporosis fractures, DXA assessment, and FRAX scoring.


Subject(s)
Osteoporosis , Osteoporotic Fractures , Adult , Humans , Adolescent , Bone Density , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Osteoporosis/epidemiology , Osteoporotic Fractures/epidemiology , Osteoporotic Fractures/etiology , Absorptiometry, Photon , Risk Factors
2.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 13: 978238, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36060940

ABSTRACT

Purpose: There has been debate regarding the appropriate cortisol cutoff during the cosyntropin stimulation test (CST) when newer cortisol assays are used. We aimed to evaluate the proper cortisol values during the standard dose CST in patients with normal hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis when the Elecsys® Cortisol II assay from Roche Diagnostics is used. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients evaluated for possible adrenal insufficiency using the standard-dose (250 mcg) CST from January 2018 to December 2020 and eventually judged to have a normal HPA axis. All the CSTs were done in the outpatient setting. Evaluation by an endocrinologist, restrictive exclusion criteria including prior glucocorticoid and opioid use, and lack of glucocorticoid treatment for at least 6 months after the CST was used to define normal HPA axis. The results are reported in the median (range). Results: We identified 63 patients who met the inclusion criteria and were considered to have a normal HPA axis. The median age was 54.7 (27.6-89.1) years; 32 (51%) were female, and 27 (43%) were white. The duration of follow-up after the CST without any glucocorticoid replacement was 13.9 (6.3-43.9) months. Cortisol levels were 21.7 (15.7-29.1) µg/dl and 24.4 (17.9-35.8) µg/dl at 30- and 60-minutes after cosyntropin administration, respectively. The lowest cortisol levels at 30 and 60 minutes for patients with either normal TSH or gonadal axis (n=47) or in whom both axes were normal (n=18) were similar to the ones of the entire cohort. Conclusion: Our study supports using a lower than previously recommended cortisol cutoff value at 30 minutes after Cosyntropin using the Roche Elecsys® Cortisol II assay. The lowest cortisol levels in our cohort were 15.7 and 17.9 µg/dL at 30 and 60 minutes after the CST, respectively. Therefore, it is essential to consider the time of cortisol draw after cosyntropin administration.


Subject(s)
Cosyntropin , Hydrocortisone , Female , Glucocorticoids , Humans , Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System , Male , Middle Aged , Pituitary-Adrenal System , Retrospective Studies
3.
Endocr Pract ; 28(10): 1078-1085, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35787466

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Published literature on physicians' preferences and sequential treatment patterns of osteoporosis therapy is scarce. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients who received bisphosphonates, denosumab, and/or raloxifene for at least 3 consecutive years or teriparatide for at least 18 months for osteoporosis. Data collection spanned 10 years, from October 2007 to September 2016, at a tertiary care center in the United States. RESULTS: In total, 12 885 patients were identified on the basis of receiving at least 1 treatment at any point in time; 1814 patients were randomly reviewed, and 274 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 68.8 ± 10.7 years, and women represented 90.9% of all the cases. Primary care physicians and rheumatologists constituted 65.7% and 22.6% of the prescribers, respectively. Before instituting a drug holiday, alendronate was the most common initial treatment (percentage, mean duration ± standard deviation in years: 69%, 5.4 ± 2.4 years) followed by ibandronate (9.5%, 4.9 ± 2.1 years) and raloxifene (9.1%, 5.2 ± 1.6 years). Denosumab was the most common second course of treatment, accounting for 29.3% of 82 patients who were subsequently prescribed another therapy, followed by alendronate (24.4%) and zoledronate (20.7%). Among patients who were placed on a drug holiday and eventually restarted on osteoporosis therapy, denosumab was the most common treatment instituted (n = 21), accounting for 40% of the total patients, followed by alendronate (32%) and zoledronate (16%). There was a progressive decline in osteoporosis therapy over the duration of the study. CONCLUSION: Alendronate was the most common initial therapy. Denosumab was the most common second course of treatment prescribed.


Subject(s)
Bone Density Conservation Agents , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal , Osteoporosis , Aged , Alendronate/therapeutic use , Denosumab/therapeutic use , Diphosphonates/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Ibandronic Acid/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Osteoporosis/drug therapy , Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal/drug therapy , Raloxifene Hydrochloride/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Teriparatide/therapeutic use , United States , Zoledronic Acid/therapeutic use
4.
Clin Case Rep ; 10(3): e05650, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35356161

ABSTRACT

Insulinomas are rare neuroendocrine pancreatic tumors that can be associated with severe episodes of hypoglycemia, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. These tumors are often difficult to localize, and hypoglycemia control can be challenging since glucose levels can be resistant to conventional therapies. Pasireotide is a novel somatostatin analog with a high affinity to multiple somatostatin receptors. It has up to 40 times higher affinity for somatostatin receptor subtype 5 in comparison with octreotide, leading to a higher inhibition of insulin release from beta cells. There are few case reports regarding the use of pasireotide in refractory hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia. We describe a challenging case of endogenous hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia refractory to standard medical treatment, in which pasireotide was used. In this case, imaging studies and calcium stimulation testing failed to localize an insulin-secreting tumor in an 83-year-old woman. Glucose levels remained low despite treatment with diazoxide, verapamil, and octreotide, necessitating the use of IV dextrose solutions. After starting subcutaneous (SC) pasireotide 0.9 mg twice a day, there was a significant improvement in the frequency and severity of hypoglycemic events, allowing the patient to be discharged from the hospital without needing IV glucose support.

5.
AACE Clin Case Rep ; 7(3): 226-227, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34095494
6.
Cureus ; 12(5): e8080, 2020 May 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32542135

ABSTRACT

Encephalopathy with autoimmune thyroid disease (EAATD) is mostly associated with Hashimoto's thyroiditis and has been uncommonly reported with Grave's disease. This case is aimed to report the association of EAATD with thyroid peroxidase (TPO) and thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI) antibodies in Grave's disease. We report a 55-year old male who presented with thyrotoxicosis and cerebellar ataxia and was diagnosed with Grave's disease based on clinical and biochemical findings. The patient was managed with anti-thyroid medications with resolution of both thyrotoxicosis and cerebellar symptoms proving the hypothesis that patient's encephalopathy was autoimmune and related to his thyroid disease. High index of suspicion should be maintained for EAATD in patients presenting with neurological deficits with associated clinical and biochemical evidence of autoimmune thyroid disease.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...