Chemotherapy-related striate melanonychia: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy medications are reported to cause discoloration of the nails known as melanonychia. Depending on the nail structure affected and the severity of the insult, the clinical features can be variable. There are a great deal of unreported cases of pigmentary nail changes associated with chemotherapy treatment. By sharing our knowledge, we hope to raise the awareness of these nail changes amongst clinicians. Early recognition is crucial to allay anxiety among patients and avoid any unnecessary investigations. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of 36-year-old woman of south Asian origin, who developed dark pigmentation in the left thumb nail during neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, and docetaxel (FEC-D) for triple negative breast cancer. Upon examination, the left thumb nail pigmentation was strikingly linear, uniform, and well demarcated extending from proximal nail fold to free margin. Despite the reassuring clinical features, the patient was understandably anxious that this could be a presentation of acral melanoma and was referred to the plastic surgeons for a nail matrix biopsy. Biopsy reassuringly was reported as melanosis and a diagnosis of striate melanonychia was made. The patient was discharged after 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy medications have improved survival rates and patient outcomes. It is important for clinicians to be aware of the association of melanonychia with certain chemotherapy medications to reduce anxiety and allow successful management of these patients without delay. Striate melanonychia in this patient was felt most likely due to the synergistic effect of chemotherapy drugs compounded with racial predisposition. Chemotherapy agents most likely to have contributed include cyclophosphamide, docetaxel, and 5-fluorouracil.

Venous thromboembolism prevention post neck of femur fractures - does it make a difference?

Neck of femur fractures predispose patients to venous thromboembolism (VTE). NICE has issued guideline 46 to reduce this risk through the use of antithrombic agents. We audited our department's VTE practise by reviewing the clinical notes of 123 consecutive patients with no exclusions. We found our compliance to be a low 6%. We also found that patients were likely to be given low molecular heparin (LMWH) only during their hospital stay. Reasons for the low adherence were probably secondary to confusion caused by the multiple thromboprophylaxis protocols used in our department. The correlation between duration of heparin administration and length of hospital stay was due to logistical difficulty in administering VTE prophylaxis out of hospital setting.