Trends and Outcomes of Synchronous Resection of Colorectal Metastasis in the Modern Era-Analysis of Targeted Hepatic NSQIP Database.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies using the NSQIP database to study hepatectomies lacked hepatic specific variables and outcomes. We used the targeted NSQIP hepatectomy database to examine the nationwide trend and the safety profile of synchronous liver and colorectal resection compared with hepatectomy alone for colorectal liver metastasis. METHODS: The targeted NSQIP hepatectomy database from 2014 was used to study patients who underwent hepatectomy for diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum. RESULTS: Of the 3064 hepatic resections in the database, 1138 cases were performed for colorectal metastasis. Of these, 1040 were liver-alone surgery and 98 were synchronous liver and colorectal resection. Most (58.7%) patients received neoadjuvant therapy. The rate of neoadjuvant therapy, intraoperative ablation, biliary reconstruction, and the use of minimally invasive technique were similar between the two groups. The overall 30-d mortality in this cohort was low (1.1%). While the mortality rate in the synchronous group was similar to liver-only group (3.1% versus 0.9%, P = 0.077). The rate of liver failure (3.3% versus 4.1%, P = 0.722) and biliary leak (5.3% versus 9.6%, P = 0.084) were similar between the two groups. However, the rate of major complications was higher on multivariable analyses (25.5% versus 12.1%, OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.5-4.1, P < 0.001) for the synchronous group. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic resection for colorectal metastasis in the modern era has low short-term mortality. While synchronous resection was associated with a higher incidence of major complications, liver-specific complications did not increase with synchronous resection.

Racial disparities in breast cancer persist despite early detection: analysis of treatment of stage 1 breast cancer and effect of insurance status on disparities.

PURPOSE: Prior research demonstrates racial disparities in breast cancer treatment. Disparities are commonly attributed to more advanced stage at presentation or aggressive tumor biology. We seek to evaluate if racial disparities persist in the treatment of stage 1 breast cancer patients who by definition are not delayed in presentation. METHODS: We selected stage 1 breast cases in the National Cancer Data Base. Patients were divided into two cohorts based on race and included White and Black patients. We also performed a subgroup analysis of patients with private insurance for comparison to determine if private insurance diminished the racial disparities noted. We analyzed differences in time to treatments by race. RESULTS: Our analysis included 546,351 patients of which 494,784 (90.6%) were White non-Hispanic and 51,567 (9.4%) were Black non-Hispanic. Black women had significantly longer times to first treatment (35.5 days vs 28.1 days), surgery (36.6 days vs 28.8 days), chemotherapy (88.1 days vs 75.4 days), radiation (131.3 days vs 99.1 days), and endocrine therapy (152.1 days vs 126.5 days) than White women. When patients with private insurance were analyzed the difference in time to surgery decreased by 1.2 days but racial differences remained statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Despite selecting for early-stage breast cancer, racial disparities between White and Black women in time to all forms of breast cancer treatment persist. These disparities while likely not oncologically significant do suggest institutional barriers for obtaining care faced by women of color which may not be addressed with improving access to mammography alone.

Thirty-Day Readmission Rate Using an Outpatient Infusion Pathway after Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

The objective of this study was to determine whether implementing an outpatient infusion pathway (OIP) resulted in a decreased 30-day readmission rate after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). Data were retrospectively gathered on all patients who underwent LRYGB at our institution between April 1, 2015, and March 31, 2016, after instituting an OIP (postinfusion group). Thirty-day readmission rate, length of stay, and 30-day mortality rate were compared with patients who underwent LRYGB between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2014, before implementing the OIP (preinfusion group). Patients not able to take 40 ounces of fluid orally at discharge after surgery were enrolled in the OIP. One OIP session would include an antiemetic, 1 liter bolus of 0.9 per cent saline, and intravenous multivitamin, thiamine, and folic acid. A total of 174 patients were included for analysis. Seventy-nine patients were in the preinfusion group and 95 patients in the postinfusion group. Of the 95 patients in the postinfusion group, 18 patients (18.9%) met inclusion criteria for the OIP. There was a 45 per cent decrease in 30-day readmission rate after the institution of the OIP for patients who underwent LRYGB, however this was not statistically significant (11.39% vs 6.31%; OR 1.907; 95% confidence interval: 0.648-5.613, P = 0.235). There was no difference in postoperative length of hospital stay (1.65 vs 1.41 days, P = 0.114) or mortality (0.7% vs 0%, P = 0.454), in the pre- and postinfusion groups, respectively. Implementation of an OIP decreased 30-day readmission rate after LRYGB by 45 per cent; however, this was not statistically significant.

Outcomes associated with resident involvement in ventral hernia repair: A population based study using the NSQIP database.

INTRODUCTION: This study evaluated the effect of resident involvement on patient outcomes following major ventral hernia repair (VHR). METHODS: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried to identify patients with major VHR between 2007 and 2010. Patient outcomes were compared based on presence or absence of resident in the operating room. RESULTS: Residents participated in 57% of the 27,773 identified cases. There was no significant difference in return to operating room or 30-day mortality. A higher incidence of superficial surgical site infection (SSI) (4.9% vs 3.9%, P = 0.013) and longer operative time (129.2 vs 99.1 min, P < 0.001) were observed with resident involvement in open inpatient cases. We found no evidence of a "July effect" on outcomes. CONCLUSION: Resident involvement in VHR has little impact on morbidity, and patients can be reassured that resident participation in their care is safe.

Work-Related Quality of Life of US General Surgery Residents: Is It Really so Bad?

PURPOSE: The quality of working life of US surgical residents has not been studied, and given the complexity of interaction between work and personal life there is a need to assess this interaction. We utilized a validated Work Related Quality of Life (WRQoL) questionnaire to evaluate the perceived work-related quality of life of general surgery residents, using a large, nationally representative sample in the United States. METHODS: Between January 2016 and March 2016, all US general surgery residents enrolled in an ACGME general surgery training program were invited to participate. The WRQoL scale measures perceived quality of life covering six domains: General Well-Being (GWB), Home-Work Interface (HWI), Job and Career Satisfaction (JCS), Control at Work (CAW), Working Conditions (WCS) and Stress at Work (SAW). RESULTS: After excluding for missing data, the final analysis included 738 residents. The average age was 30 (±3) years, of whom 287 (38.9%) were female, 272 (36.9%) were from a community hospital, and 477 (64.6%) were juniors (postgraduate year ≤ 3). Demographically, the respondents matched expected percentages. When male and female residents were compared, males had statistically better HWI (p<0.001), better GWB (p = 0.03), more CAW (p = 0.0003) and WCS (p = 0.001). Junior residents had a lower JCS (p = 0.002) and CAW (p = 0.04) compared to seniors. There were no differences between university and community residents in any of the domains of WRQoL. Although residents were more stressed than other professions but the overall WRQoL was comparable. CONCLUSIONS: The nature of surgical residency and a surgical career may in fact be more "stressful" than other professions, yet may not translate into a worsened Quality of Life. Our findings suggest further study is needed to elucidate why female residents have or experience a lower perceived WRQoL than their male colleagues.

Efficacy in Deep Vein Thrombosis Prevention With Extended Mechanical Compression Device Therapy and Prophylactic Aspirin Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Control Trial.

BACKGROUND: Aspirin at 325 mg twice daily is now included as a nationally approved venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis protocol for low-risk total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. The purpose of this study is to examine whether there is a difference in deep vein thrombosis (DVT) occurrence after a limited tourniquet TKA using aspirin-based prophylaxis with or without extended use of mechanical compression device (MCD) therapy. METHODS: One hundred limited tourniquet TKA patients, whose DVT risk was managed with aspirin 325 mg twice daily for 3 weeks, were randomized to either using an MCD during hospitalization only or extended use at home up to 6 weeks postoperatively. Lower extremity duplex venous ultrasonography (LEDVU) was completed on the second postoperative day, 14 days postoperatively, and at 3 months postoperatively to confirm the absence of DVT after treatment. RESULTS: The DVT rate for the postdischarge MCD therapy group was 0% and 23.1% for the inpatient MCD group (P < .001). All DVTs resolved by 3 months postoperatively. Patient satisfaction was 9.56 (±0.82) for postdischarge MCD patients vs 8.50 (±1.46) for inpatient MCD patients (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Limited tourniquet TKA patients who were mobilized early, managed with aspirin for 3 weeks postoperatively, and on MCD therapy for up to 6 weeks postoperatively experienced superior DVT prophylaxis than patients receiving MCD therapy only as an inpatient (P < .05). The 0% incidence of nonsymptomatic DVTs prevented by aspirin and extended-use MCD further validates this type of prophylaxis in low DVT risk TKA patients.

Urinary Retention Following Colorectal Surgery.

Literature on postoperative urinary retention (POUR) after colorectal resections is limited. The aim of our study was to evaluate the incidence of and risk factors for POUR after elective colorectal resections in men ≥55 years without genitourinary issues. A retrospective review of elective colorectal resections (June 1, 2014 to June 1, 2015) in men ≥55 years without genitourinary conditions was performed at our institution. Patient demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologist score, body mass index (BMI), surgical history, type of disease, extent of resection, surgical approach, operating room (OR) time, volume of OR fluids administered, and intra- and postoperative urine output were included for analysis. Seventy patients were identified. Nine (12.9%) experienced POUR. Patients with POUR experienced longer OR time (324 vs 239 minutes; P = 0.048) and had a lower median BMI (23.8 vs 28 kg/m2; P = 0.038). There were no significant differences in regards to age, comorbidities, diagnosis, type of resection, surgical approach, intravenous fluids administered operatively, or postoperative urine output. The incidence of POUR in male patients at least 55 years of age after elective colorectal resection in our institution was 12.9 per cent. Longer operative time and lower BMI were associated with a higher incidence of POUR.

Initial Experiences with Endovascular Management of Submassive Pulmonary Embolism: Is It Safe?

BACKGROUND: Interventional strategies for massive and submassive pulmonary embolism (smPE) have historically included either systematic intravenous thrombolytic alteplase or surgical embolectomy, both of which are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. However, with the advent of endovascular techniques, recent studies have suggested that an endovascular approach to the treatment of acute smPE may be both safe and effective with excellent outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of patients who have undergone catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for smPE at our institution in an effort to determine the safety of the procedure. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted from December 2012 to June 2015 to identify patients whom underwent CDT in the treatment of a smPE at our institution. Primary measure was safety of the procedure. Outcome variables were classified as serious or minor adverse events. Serious events included death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and bleeding complications requiring surgical intervention or transfusion. Minor events included groin hematoma, development of arteriovenous fistula, and bleeding requiring interruption or cessation of CDT. In addition, a secondary measure included effectiveness of CDT based on preinterventional and postinterventional clinical examination and radiographic findings. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients undergoing CDT for smPE at our institution were evaluated. The standard procedure included access via bilateral femoral veins and placement of bilateral EKOS catheters for ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis (USAT), with Activase (alteplase) at 1 mg per hour in each catheter for a total of 12 hr. There were no serious adverse events and only 4 patients (14.8%) had minor events, of which only 1 patient required premature termination of therapy due to bleeding resulting in a 3.7% clinically relevant bleeding rate. In addition, a reduction in a right-to-left ventricular end-diastolic diameter ratio (RV/LV ratio) on follow-up imaging was observed in each of the 18 patients where preinterventional and postinterventional imaging was available. Likewise, via chart review, all patients reported significant cessation of shortness-of-breath and resolution of chest pain with associated decrease in supplemental oxygen requirement. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence, the majority of which has been industry funded, suggests that CDT should be considered as the first-line therapy for smPE. Our experience, in this single-institution retrospective review, demonstrates that CDT with USAT in the treatment of smPE is safe, while providing immediate resolution of both RV strain and clinical symptoms such as shortness-of-breath and chest pain. We hope that these data will allow other institutions to consider CDT as a plausible option in the treatment of smPE.

Improving Patient Safety Event Reporting Among Residents and Teaching Faculty.

BACKGROUND: A June 2012 site visit report from the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Clinical Learning Environment Review revealed that residents and physicians at TriHealth, Inc., a large, nonprofit independent academic medical center serving the Greater Cincinnati area in Ohio, had an opportunity to improve their awareness and understanding of the hospital's system for reporting patient safety concerns in 3 areas: (1) what constitutes a reportable patient safety event, (2) who is responsible for reporting, and (3) how to use the hospital's current reporting system. METHODS: To improve the culture of patient safety, we designed a quality improvement project with the goal to increase patient safety event reporting among residents and teaching faculty. An anonymous questionnaire assessed physicians' and residents' attitudes and experience regarding patient safety event reporting. An educational intervention was provided in each graduate medical education program to improve knowledge and skills related to patient safety event reporting, and the anonymous questionnaire was distributed after the intervention. We compared the responses to the preintervention and postintervention questionnaires and tracked monthly patient safety event reports for 1 year postintervention. RESULTS: The number of patient safety event reports increased following the educational intervention; however, we saw wide variability in reporting per month. On the postintervention questionnaire, participants demonstrated improved knowledge and attitudes toward patient safety event reporting. CONCLUSION: The goal of this unique project was to increase patient safety event reporting by both residents and teaching faculty in 6 residency programs through education. We achieved this goal through an educational intervention tailored to the institution's new event reporting system delivered to each residency program. We clearly understand that improvements in quality and patient safety require ongoing effort. The keys to ongoing sustainability include (1) developing patient safety faculty and resident experts in each training program to teach patient safety and to be role models, (2) working toward decreasing the barriers to reporting, and (3) providing timely feedback and system changes.

Factors Influencing Primary Care Physicians' Referral for Bariatric Surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Bariatric surgery has been shown to be an effective weight loss treatment for the morbidly obese, but some primary care physicians remain hesitant about postoperative treatment and management of patients who have undergone the surgery and recommend it to their obese patients infrequently. The purpose of this study was to evaluate perceptions of primary care physicians of the role of bariatric surgery in the management of obese patients and to identify possible barriers to treatment. METHODS: A survey of PCPs within our institution was conducted to determine attitudes, knowledge, and practices regarding the treatment of morbidly obese patients,with a specific focus on identifying factors that influence referral patterns for bariatric surgery. RESULTS: Among 161 eligible PCPs, 57 (35.4%) responded. Most respondents (59%) reported that at least 1 in 4 of their patients had a BMI 35 kg/m2. Although 39% thought that diet and exercise were an effective means of sustained weight loss, only 12% were satisfied with prescribing nonsurgical interventions. Sixty-three percent agreed that bariatric surgery is generally effective in the long term. All respondents were aware of the commonly established benefits, including improvement of diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. In addition, 65% were familiar with the indications for bariatric surgery, and 70% felt comfortable discussing it with patients as a treatment option. Fewer than half of the respondents felt confident in providing postoperative management. Cost was a perceived limitation, with 53%reporting that most of their patients could not afford bariatric surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The general attitude of PCPs toward bariatric surgery is supportive. Physicians are largely aware of the indications and benefits; however, far fewer are comfortable in management of patients after surgery. A lack of supplemental information and concerns regarding the cost of surgery can impede treatment and referrals.