Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Inflammatory Breast Cancer Program for Quality Improvement.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory Breast Cancer (IBC) is a rare but aggressive subtype of breast cancer accounting for only 1% to 5% of cases but comprising 7% to 10% of breast cancer deaths. Diagnosis of IBC can be challenging which can lead to delays in diagnosis and treatment. We formed a multidisciplinary IBC program to address the unique challenges of diagnosing and treating patients with IBC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with an IBC CPT code and collected data on the date of the first visit with medical oncology, surgical oncology, or radiation oncology, date of biopsy, and initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In 2020, as part of the IBC program at The Ohio State University, the decision tree (DT) was revised to help identify potential IBC patients. These patients were prioritized with a multidisciplinary appointment within 3 days. RESULTS: After adjusting the call center DT, there was a significant decline in the median and mean time from initial contact to chemotherapy initiation and an insignificant decrease in the mean time from contact to biopsy (P = .71884). The median time of contact to chemotherapy was 10 days (range 9-14) in 2020, a decrease of 43% compared to 3 prior years (P = .0068). After initiation of the IBC program, 100% of patients underwent trimodality therapy-neoadjuvant systemic therapy, modified radical mastectomy, and post mastectomy radiation therapy. CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary IBC program that included scheduling DT with specific questions about IBC symptoms helped identify potential patients and significantly decrease time to treatment and assured completion of trimodality therapy.

Ergonomics of gastrointestinal endoscopies: Musculoskeletal injury among endoscopy physicians, nurses, and technicians.

BACKGROUND: Musculoskeletal injuries (MSI) have plagued endoscopists and ancillary staff for decades without any innovative and strong ergonomic guidelines. It has placed a physical and mental strain on our endoscopists and ancillary staff. We have very have limited data supporting this claim in our region and most data is supported by western literature. AIM: To document the prevalence of MSI, and awareness and practices of ergonomics by endoscopists and ancillary staff. METHODS: This is an observational cross-sectional study, conducted in Karachi, a city that boasts the maximum number of daily endoscopies in the country. An eleven-point self-administered questionnaire was distributed and used to evaluate MSI and ergonomic adjustments amongst three tertiary care setups in Karachi. An onsite survey via a 13-point checklist for endoscopy suite facilities was used to assess the ergonomically friendly conveniences at five tertiary care setups in Karachi. A total of 56 participants replied with a filled survey. RESULTS: There were 56 participants in total with 39 (69.6%) males. Pain and numbness were documented by 75% of the patients, with pain in the neck (41.1%), lower back (32.1%), shoulder (21.4%), thumb (12.5%), hand (23.2%), elbow (8.9%), and carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) (7.1%). Of those, 33.3% attributed their symptoms to endoscopy, 14.2% said that symptoms were not caused by endoscopy, and 52.4% were not certain whether endoscopy had caused their symptoms. Twenty-one point four percent of patients had to take time off their work, while 33.9% took medications for pain. Ergonomic modifications to prevent musculoskeletal injury, including placement of endoscopic monitor at eye level and the cardiac monitor in front, stopping the procedure to move patients, sitting while performing colonoscopy, and navigating height-adjustable bed were used by 21.4%. Nine out of 13 ergonomic facilities were not present in all five tertiary care hospitals. Conveniences, such as anti-fatigue mats, height-adjustable computer stations, and time out between patients were not present. CONCLUSION: Three-fourth of our endoscopists reported MSI, of which more than half were not sure or attributed this problem to endoscopy. The prevalence of MSI warrants urgent attention.

Impact of Gastrointestinal Diseases on Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients in Pakistan.

Objective This study aimed to evaluate the impact of gastrointestinal (GI) diseases on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in Pakistani patients. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted from 1st January 2019 to 15th February 2019 at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan by employing a self-administered questionnaire called Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI). Questionnaires were distributed among the patients presenting to outpatient gastroenterology clinics to evaluate their HRQoL. Results A total of 199 patients were included in this study, and their mean GIQLI score was 87.8 ± 17.8. Results showed that more severe core symptoms can lead to a poorer QoL. Overall GIQLI scores and most of its domain scores were lower in females as compared to males (p-value: 0.02). Obese patients had an overall lower mean GIQLI score including in the GI, psychological, and social domains while advanced age was associated with a higher disease-specific GIQLI score. Conclusion Based on our findings, GI diseases negatively impact the HRQoL in patients. Physicians need to consider the different domains of QoL as part of a holistic approach to treating these patients.