Effect of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirator on Venous Blood Carbon Dioxide Levels and Hemodynamic Changes in Health Care Workers.

Background: N95 filtering facepiece respirators (FFR) are used by health care workers for prevention of airborne infection, and its use has increased manifolds during COVID-19 pandemic. Prolonged use may result in carbon dioxide (CO2) accumulation, affect hemodynamics, and blood gas values. Although arterial blood gas values accurately measure the blood CO2 levels, venous blood gas values also show acceptable correlation. Aim: To evaluate the physiological impact of N95 FFRs on health care workers, including hemodynamic changes and venous blood levels of CO2 during a period of 6 h. Settings and Design: Prospective observational study in a tertiary care hospital. Methods: The study was conducted on 30 health care workers who performed routine duties while wearing N95 FFR. Venous blood gas values (CO2, pH, and bicarbonate) and vitals (respiratory rate, heart rate, blood pressure, and saturation) were noted at baseline, 2 (T2), and 6 h (T6) after wearing the mask. Discomfort level was also measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of 1-10. Statistical Analysis: Repeated measures analysis was done using repeated measures ANOVA or Friedman's test. Group comparisons for continuously distributed data were made using independent sample "t" test or Wilcoxon test. Results and Conclusion: Hemodynamic and blood gas values did not change over time. The VAS for discomfort because of respirator use was 1.33 (1.42) at T2 and 2.77 (1.91) at T6. This was a significant increase in discomfort over time (P = 0.001). About 80% of participants experienced discomfort during this period. N95 FFR did not lead to significant alteration in hemodynamics or change in blood gas values after 6 h of continuous usage. However, discomfort significantly increased over time.

Current practice of Rapid Sequence Induction (RSI) in pediatric anesthesia: A survey from India.

Background and Aims: Rapid Sequence Induction (RSI) is an established technique to secure the airway in patients who are at risk of aspiration. The practice of RSI in the pediatric population is highly variable due to numerous patient factors. We conducted a survey to find the prevalent practices and adherence of anesthesiologists to the practice of RSI in different pediatric age groups and whether it differs with the experience of the anesthesiologist or the age of the child. Material and Methods: The survey was conducted among residents and consultants attending the pediatric national anesthesia conference. The questionnaire consisted of 17 questions on anesthesiologist's experience, adherence, conduct of pediatric RSI, and the reason for nonadherence. Results: The response rate was 75% (192/256). Anesthetists having less than 10 years of experience adhered to RSI more often as compared to respondents with more experience. Succinylcholine was the most commonly used muscle relaxant for induction, with use increasing in higher age groups. The application of cricoid pressure increased with increasing age groups. Anesthetists with >10 years of experience used cricoid pressure more often in age groups of <1 year (P < 0.05). In a scenario of intestinal obstruction, adherence to RSI was low in pediatrics as compared to adults, with 82% of respondents agreeing to this. Conclusion: This survey on the practice of RSI in the pediatric population demonstrates wide variation in the practice among individuals and the reasons for nonadherence as compared to adults. It highlights the need felt by almost all the participants for more research and protocol in the practice of pediatric RSI.

Allaying Pediatric Preoperative Anxiety, Where are we Now? - A Nationwide Survey.

Background: Preoperative anxiety (PA) in children is a common phenomenon associated with various negative patient outcomes. Allaying PA is accepted as a standard of care, but its use is not universal and often overlooked. This survey is designed to evaluate the nationwide current practice patterns and attitudes of anesthesiologists toward the practice of allaying PA in children. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire of 25 questions, including information on methods of relieving PA in children, reasons for noncompliance, and associated complications, was framed. It was circulated among members of the Indian Society of Anaesthesiologists through an online survey of Google Forms and manually. Results: Four hundred and fifty anesthesiologists were surveyed. Responses were predominantly from anesthesiologists practicing in medical colleges across the country. Although 97% of the surveyed respondents practiced anxiety-relieving strategies, only 37% used it consistently. Seventy-three percent of anesthesiologists practiced both pharmacological and nonpharmacological techniques. The most common reason for avoiding premedication was an anticipated difficult airway (88%). Inadequate sedation was a commonly reported problem. Ninety-five percent of participants felt that PA-relieving strategies should be integral to pediatric anesthesia practice. The most common reason for not following these practices was an inadequate hospital infrastructure (67%). Ninety-seven percent of the participants believed that more awareness is required on this crucial perioperative issue. Conclusion: Only 37% of the surveyed anesthesiologists consistently used some form of PA-relieving strategy and the practice varied widely. Further improvement and team approach involving anesthesiologists, surgeons, and nurses is required to ensure the quality of pediatric PA-relieving services and establish it as a standard of care.

Comparative evaluation of landmark technique and ultrasound-guided caudal epidural injection in pediatric population: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Caudal block is a common regional anesthesia technique in pediatrics with landmark method predominantly being practiced. Ultrasound-guided technique provides real-time visualization of the structures and injection while performing caudal block. We performed this meta-analysis to determine the utility of ultrasound in caudal blocks in children over the landmark-based technique. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials comparing ultrasound-guided caudal blocks and landmark technique in pediatrics were searched from databases-PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and CENTRAL from inception until August 2020. The primary objective was success rate between the two techniques and secondary objectives included time to perform the block, first puncture success, and complications. RESULTS: Five trials with 904 participants were included for this meta-analysis. There was no difference in success rate between the two techniques (Risk ratio-1.07; 95% CI [0.97, 1.18]; p = .15). Time to perform the block was similar (Mean difference-8.88 s; 95% CI [-21.64, 39.40; p = .57) while first puncture success was higher with ultrasound-guided technique (Risk ratio-1.31; 95% CI [1.15, 1.49]; p = .0001). Complications like vascular puncture and needle misplacement were lower in the ultrasound group, and no serious complications were seen in any patient. Needle visualization and sacral canal distension were seen in 82% and 97.5% of the cases, respectively, in ultrasound group. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided caudal injection does not improve the success rate or time to perform the block but results in higher first puncture success and lower incidence of complications compared to landmark technique.

Analgesic efficacy and spread of local anesthetic in ultrasound-guided paravertebral, pectoralis II, and serratus anterior plane block for breast surgeries: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) has become the gold standard to provide postoperative analgesia in breast surgery. Recently, ultrasound-guided (USG) pectoralis (PECS) block and serratus anterior plane (SAP) block have been described as an alternative to TPVB. The objectives were to compare TPVB, PECS, and SAP block in terms of analgesic efficacy and the spread of local anesthetic by ultrasound imaging, correlating it with the sensory blockade. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective randomized interventional study conducted in 45 ASA grades I-II patients scheduled for the elective breast surgery. Patients were randomly allocated into three groups, i.e., Gr.1 (USG -TPVB) (ropivacaine 0.375% 20 ml), Gr.2 (USG-PECS II) block (ropivacaine 0.375% 30 ml), and Gr.3 (USG-SAP) (ropivacaine 0.375% 30 ml). Spread of the local anesthetics was seen with ultrasound imaging. Onset of sensory blockade, postoperative fentanyl consumption, and pain scores was measured. RESULTS: TPVB and SAP group had comparatively higher spread and sensory block compared to PECS group. Postoperative fentanyl requirement (mean ± SD) was 428.33 ± 243.1 µg, 644.67 ± 260.15 µg, and 415 ± 182.44 µg in the TPVB group, PECS II group, and SAP group, respectively. SAP group had significantly lesser requirement than PECS II group (P = 0.028) but similar requirement as in TPVB group (P = 1.0). Pain scores were not significantly different among the group in the postoperative period. CONCLUSION: TPVB and SAP group result in a greater spread of the drug and provide equivalent analgesia and are superior to the PECS II block in providing analgesia for breast surgeries. SAP block is easier to perform than TPVB with lesser chances of complications and results in faster onset.

Evaluation and Comparison of Clonidine and Dexmedetomidine for Attenuation of Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation are noxious stimuli which evoke a transient but marked sympathetic response. Alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonists attenuate the sympathoadrenal responses by inhibiting noradrenaline release. AIM: This study aims to evaluate and compare the effect of intravenous dexmedetomidine and clonidine on cardiovascular response resulting from laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This was a prospective randomized controlled study carried out in the operating room. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status I and II patients were randomly allocated into three groups, that is, Group C (clonidine 2 µg/kg), Group D (dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg), and Group S (normal saline) infused over 10 min. Blood pressures - systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR) were recorded after drug administration and intubation at subsequent intervals. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Quantitative data were analyzed using ANOVA test (with post hoc Bonferroni correction for intragroup comparison). Qualitative data were analyzed using Chi-square test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: HR, SBP, DBP, and MAP were lower in Group C and D compared to Group S at all times measured. HR was significantly lower in Group D compared to Group C after drug infusion. At 1 min after intubation, SBP and MAP were lower in Group D compared to Group C. At 3, 5, and 10 min after intubation, SBP, DBP, and MAP were lower in Group D compared to Group C. CONCLUSION: There was significant reduction in hemodynamic response by dexmedetomidine and clonidine as compared to controls. Furthermore, attenuation of the pressor response to intubation was better following premedication with dexmedetomidine than with clonidine.