Pain Intensity of Skeletally Anchored Maxillary Molar Distalization in Conjunction with Micro-osteoperforations: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Objective To assess pain intensity levels during orthodontic therapy of Class II malocclusion patients undergoing skeletally anchored maxillary molar distalization assisted with different micro-osteoperforation (MOP) approaches. Methods Twenty-seven patients (12 males and 18 females) with a mean age of 16.1 ± 0.3 years were randomized into three equal groups (n=9): Group 1 comprised MOPs on buccal surface, Group 2 comprised MOPs on buccal and palatal surface, and Group 3 comprised the control or no-MOP group. The patients underwent maxillary molar distalization using skeletally anchored distal jet appliance assisted with or without MOPs. The MOPs were applied repeatedly on the buccal and buccal and palatal sides, or no MOP (control). Pain intensity was assessed using a 10 cm visual analog scale after each device activation at 24, 48, 72 hours, and at seven days. Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and repeated measures ANOVA for non-paired and paired means. Results Both approaches of buccal and buccal and palatal application of MOPs showed statistically significant (p< 0.01) higher levels of pain intensity after the first activation at 24 hours. Nevertheless, pain intensity levels decreased significantly in both MOP groups and between the two activations. Conclusion The repeated application of MOPs on either the buccal side only or on both buccal and palatal sides during maxillary molar distalization did not affect the levels of pain experienced; however, these levels were reported to be higher than that obtained in the control group. Moreover, it is observed that these pain levels tend to gradually reduce to mild levels over the subsequent days.

Clinical Evaluation of Single Versus Repeated Micro-Osteoperforations During Orthodontic Canine Retraction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION: In the majority of orthodontic premolar extraction cases, the canine retraction phase is the most laborious procedure. This randomized clinical trial aimed to assess the effect of single versus repeated micro-osteoperforations (MOPs) during orthodontic canine retraction. METHODS: In this split-mouth study, two equal groups of 18 patients who required maxillary first premolar extractions and fixed orthodontic therapy were randomly assigned (n=9). In Group I, MOPs were only performed once on one site before retraction, whereas in Group II, MOPs were performed on one site repeatedly once a month for four months. In both groups, the contralateral control sites received no MOPs. The canines were retracted using mini-screws and closed-coil nickel-titanium springs. Using the patients' 3D models, the primary outcome measure at four months was the amount of orthodontic canine distal movement. The amount of anchorage loss (AL), degree of molar rotation (MR) and canine rotation (CR), and degree of canine tipping (CT) were measured as the secondary outcomes. The comparison of mean changes in the primary and secondary outcomes between the groups was done using the independent sample t-test (p<0.05). RESULTS: The rate of canine retraction, degree of CT, and rotation were not significantly different between the two groups (p>0.05). Additionally, there were no statistically significant variations in the maxillary first MR and the degree of AL (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: When maxillary canine retraction was performed with a single and repeated regimen of MOPs, comparable levels of distal CR and tipping were observed, along with an identical minimal degree of MR and AL.

Treatment effects of Herbst appliance in skeletal Class II cases during pre-pubertal and post-pubertal periods: a cone-beam computed tomographic study.

In the present study, Thirty-six Class patients II (A condition in which the upper jaw is larger than the lower jaw) were randomly selected and assigned to one of two groups based on their maturation stage: the pre-pubertal group (18 patients, mean age 9.15 ± 1.5 years) and post-pubertal group (18 patients, mean age 16.3 ± 1.0 years). All patients were treated with a metallic splint-supported Herbst IV appliance (An appliance that acts like artificial joint working between the upper and power jaws that keeps the lower jaw in a forward position, thus improving the Class II condition). Pretreatment (T1) and post-Herbst IV treatment (T2) scans were obtained for both groups. Dental and skeletal measurements were made on the scans and statistically analyzed using paired and independent t-tests. The study hypothesis was that; the dentoskeletal changes in Class II malocclusion treatment using Herbst appliance in the Pre-pubertal is more than the Post-pubertal growth stage due to the remaining growth potential for the pre-pubertal patients. The comparison between the two groups revealed statistically significant differences in horizontal skeletal parameters in the lower jaw only, while other readings were similar.

Digital evaluation of Bolton's tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusions categories of Egyptian adolescent orthodontic population: A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective investigation aimed to compare Bolton's ratios among different malocclusion groups of Egyptian adolescent orthodontic patients with original Bolton's standards. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Pre-treatment dental casts of 588 Egyptian subjects, 290 males and 298 females with mean age 16.7±2.2 years, were randomly selected and classified into 220 class I (108 males and 112 females), 230 class II (112 males and 118 females), and 138 class III (68 males and 70 females) groups. Mesiodistal widths from first molar to first molar were measured on 3-dimensionally scanned models via software and ratios were calculated. Two-way analysis of variance compared ratios as a function of skeletal classification and gender. Additionally, percentages of significant discrepancy outside 2 standard deviations (SDs) were calculated. RESULTS: The anterior mean ratio for the total sample were higher (79.4±4.7) and overall mean ratio was lower (90.1±5) than Bolton's standards. The differences between the obtained and standard values were statistically significant (P<0.001). However, there were no significant differences in either anterior ratio (P=0.637) or overall ratio (P=295) regarding gender. Class I cases showed the highest mean anterior ratio of 80±5.7 whereas class II and class III cases had the lowest ratio of 78.5±4.6 and 78.7±3.5, respectively. Concerning overall ratio, class III subjects had the highest ratio of 91.8±2.6 with no substantial distinction from class II cases (90.2±4.7) but was significantly different from class I cases that demonstrated the lowest ratio (89.7±5, P=0.020). High percentages of patients displayed clinically significant tooth size discrepancies (TSD), exceeding either above or below 2SD of Bolton's values, which were more marked in the anterior ratio. These were 25.2% and 7.4% for anterior ratio and 3.4% and 15.4% for overall ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Tooth size ratios of Egyptian orthodontic patients are generally different than the original Bolton's standards. Patients with class I and class III malocclusions had greater anterior and overall ratios than those with class II malocclusions with no considerable gender differences in either ratio.

Three-Dimensional Assessment of Mandibular Condylar Volume and Position Subsequent to Twin Block Functional Therapy of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion Accompanied by Low-Level Laser Therapy.

This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on mandibular condylar volume and position following treatment of a Class II malocclusion with a twin block (TB) appliance employing cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Twenty-four growing patients, aged 9-12 years, were randomly allocated into control and laser groups. All patients were treated with a TB appliance. The patients in the laser group were treated weekly with a gallium-aluminum-arsenide (GaAlAs) diode laser around the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) region for three months. CBCT images were obtained before and after TB therapy and the changes in TMJ and skeletal variables were evaluated and compared among and between the groups. In the laser group, the condylar volume of the right and left sides significantly increased by 213.3 mm3 and 231.2 mm3, respectively (p < 0.05), whereas in the control group it significantly increased by 225.2 mm3, and 244.2 mm3, respectively (p < 0.05), with forward and lateral positioning of both sides. Furthermore, effective mandibular, ramus, and corpus lengths were increased, which were not significant between the groups. Low-Level Laser therapy accomplished no considerable effect on mandibular condylar volume and position following the functional orthopedic treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusions using a TB appliance.

Outcome of photodynamic therapy on orthodontic leveling and alignment of mandibular anterior segment: A controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a non-invasive approach that has drawn attention to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement (OTM). However, no studies have been published that evaluates the outcome of PDT on orthodontic leveling and alignment. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate outcome of PDT on orthodontic leveling and alignment of mandibular anterior segment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients (18 females and 12 males) were included who had moderate mandibular crowding with average age was 19.23 ± 3.1 years. They were randomly divided into a control group without PDT intervention and a laser group. All patients followed non-extraction approach using one category of fixed appliance and matching NiTi archwire sequence for 3 months. In PDT group, methylene blue mediated gallium aluminum arsenide laser was applied with 635 nm, 6.5 J/cm2, for 10 s at 10 points (0.2 J/point) started immediately after first wire then at days 3,7,14 of first month and repeated for additional 2 months. Relief of crowding was assessed by Little`s irregularity index (LII) scores after 4, 8, and 12 weeks through scanned 3-dimensional models via a software. RESULTS: Both groups showed improvements in mandibular crowding as evidenced by significant decreases (p ≤ 0.001) in LII scores during all observation intervals with no significant differences (p > 0.05). Moreover, the alignment`s rate showed no significant differences between groups. CONCLUSION: PDT produced a negligible effect concerning alignment of crowded mandibular anterior teeth. Besides, OTM's rate at different observation intervals showed an equivalent pattern either with or without PDT.

Three-dimensional assessment of transverse dentoskeletal mandibular dimensions after utilizing two designs of fixed mandibular expansion appliance: A prospective clinical investigation.

The aim of this clinical study was to evaluate and compare the dentoskeletal transverse mandibular arch dimensions following the use of two designs of fixed mandibular expanders using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Twenty orthodontic patients, 12 females and 8 males, with mean age of 13.4 ± 0.5 years were selected and randomly divided into two equivalent groups; group A consisted of 10 patients (4 boys, 6 girls) who were treated with modified Williams expander and group B consisted of 10 patients (4 boys, 6 girls) who were treated with a two-arm fixed expander. Consistent expansion instructions were given to all patients according to a standardized slow protocol of one quarter turn twice/week for both expanders. Routine orthodontic records as well as mandibular CBCTs were obtained before (T1) and immediately after expansion (T2) to estimate changes in dentoskeletal mandibular transverse dimensions. The data was statistically analyzed and the significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05. Mandibular intercanine, inter-premolar, intermolar widths; and arch perimeter were significantly increased (p ≤ 0.05) following expansion with both fixed expanders. However, the changes in inter-premolar width, intercanine width, and arch perimeter were significantly augmented in two-arm fixed expander group than modified Williams's group. In contrast, their effects on the skeletal mandibular body width were non-significant (p > 0.05). Both expanders yielded significant and equivalent dentoalveolar effects that were more evident with two-arm fixed expander than the William one. Both fixed designs enhanced mandibular transverse dental dimensions; however, they were unsuccessful to create any considerable skeletal effects.

The impact of chlorhexidine mouth rinse on the bond strength of polycarbonate orthodontic brackets.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the current in-vivo study was to assess the effect of using 0.12% chlorhexidine (CHX) mouth rinse, before bonding, on shear bond strength of polycarbonate brackets bonded with composite adhesive. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eighteen orthodontic patients with a mean age 21.41 ± 1.2 years, who were scheduled to have 2 or more first premolars extracted, were included in this study. Patients were referred for an oral prophylaxis program which included, in part, the use of a mouth rinse. Patients were divided into 2 groups, a test group of 9 patients who used 0.12% CHX gluconate mouth rinse twice daily and a control group of 9 patients who used a mouth rinse without CHX, but with same color. After 1 week, polycarbonate brackets were bonded to first premolars with Transbond XT composite adhesive. Premolars were extracted after 28 days and tested for shear bond strength on a universal testing machine. Student's t-test was used to compare shear bond strengths of both groups. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found in bond strengths' values between both groups. The test group (with CHX) has mean shear bond strength of 14.21 ± 2.42 MPa whereas the control group (without CHX) revealed a mean strength of 14.52 ± 2.31 MPa. CONCLUSION: The use of 0.12% CHX mouth rinse, for one week before bonding, did not affect the shear bond strength of polycarbonate brackets bonded with Transbond composite. Furthermore, these brackets showed clinically acceptable bond strength.

Coating failure of commercial orthodontic magnets and DNA fragmentation of oral mucosa cells.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate possible adverse effects of orthodontic magnets on the oral mucosa. METHODS: Twenty orthodontic patients, between 14 and 20 years of age, were used. All patients consented to participate in the trial, which ran for six months. Following extraction of the first premolars, samarium-cobalt (SmCo5) orthodontic magnets were used to move the upper right canines into the extraction spaces. The contralateral canines were retracted with elastomeric chain. The orthodontic appliance consisted of direct-bonded standard edgewise fibreglass brackets and molar tubes, and teflon-coated preformed archwires. At regular scheduled visits the following were recorded: the condition of the protective magnet coating; weight loss by the magnets; levels of nickel, iron and chromium ions in unstimulated saliva; viability of recovered oral mucosa cells with trypan blue. DNA fragmentation of the oral mucosa cells was analysed at the start of the trial, after one week, one month, three months and six months with the single cell gel electrophoresis assay (Comet assay). The elemental compositions of five magnets were assessed with energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis. RESULTS: By the third month the magnets had lost their protective resin coats. At six months the magnets had lost 3 per cent of their initial weights. Significant weight loss and raised saliva levels of nickel, iron and chromium ions occurred from the first week. The number of oral mucosa cells with DNA fragmentation increased steadily on both sides of the mouth from the first week. More DNA fragmented cells occurred on the Magnet side than on the Non-magnet side. The trial was discontinued when half of the subjects showed DNA damaged mucosal cells. CONCLUSIONS: Because the protective coating failed after a few weeks, orthodontic magnets are unsuitable for long-term intra-oral use. It is uncertain if the greater cell damage on the Magnet side was due to the corrosion products, proximity to the static magnetic field or both factors.