ABSTRACT
The initial uses of ultrasound waves in the medical field were limited to the thermal ablation of solid tumors and as a diagnostic tool. Recent advances at the preclinical stage have allowed the use of ultrasound as a powerful tool to improve drug delivery when the agent is administered encapsulated inside a nanoparticle. This spatial and temporal control of drug release, using a non-invasive modality, is a promising approach to decrease the side effects of conventional chemotherapy in cancer treatments, as it reduces the interaction of the anti-neoplastic agent with healthy tissues. In this review, we explain the physics of ultrasound, introduce and discuss several examples on the use of nanoparticles as drug carriers, with a focus on liposomes. Examples of in vitro and in vivo studies are presented and discussed.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Drug Delivery Systems , Liposomes/administration & dosage , Nanoparticles/administration & dosage , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Ultrasonics , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Drug Carriers , Humans , Liposomes/chemistry , Nanoparticles/chemistryABSTRACT
A custom ultrasonic exposure chamber with real-time fluorescence detection was used to measure acoustically-triggered drug release from Pluronic P-105 micelles under continuous wave (CW) or pulsed ultrasound in the frequency range of 20 to 90 kHz. The measurements were based on the decrease in fluorescence intensity when drug was transferred from the micelle core to the aqueous environment. Two fluorescent drugs were used: doxorubicin (DOX) and its paramagnetic analogue, ruboxyl (Rb). Pluronic P-105 at various concentrations in aqueous solutions was used as a micelle-forming polymer. Drug release was most efficient at 20-kHz ultrasound and dropped with increasing ultrasonic frequency despite much higher power densities. These data suggest an important role of transient cavitation in drug release. The release of DOX was higher than that of Rb due to stronger interaction and deeper insertion of Rb into the core of the micelles. Drug release was higher at lower Pluronic concentrations, which presumably resulted from higher local drug concentrations in the core of Pluronic micelles when the number of micelles was low. At constant frequency, drug release increased with increasing power density. At constant power density and for pulse duration longer than 0.1 s, peak release under pulsed ultrasound was the same as stationary release under CW ultrasound. Released drug was quickly re-encapsulated between the pulses of ultrasound, which suggests that upon leaving the sonicated volume, the non-extravasated and non-internalized drug would circulate in the encapsulated form, thus preventing unwanted drug interactions with normal tissues.
Subject(s)
Antibiotics, Antineoplastic/administration & dosage , Daunorubicin/analogs & derivatives , Doxorubicin/administration & dosage , Micelles , Antibiotics, Antineoplastic/chemistry , Daunorubicin/administration & dosage , Daunorubicin/chemistry , Doxorubicin/chemistry , Drug Compounding , Excipients , Free Radicals , Polymers/chemistry , Spectrometry, Fluorescence , UltrasonicsABSTRACT
To minimize adverse side effects of chemotherapy, we have developed a micellar drug carrier that retains hydrophobic drugs, and then releases the drug by ultrasonic stimulation. This study investigated the DNA damage induced by doxorubicin (DOX) delivered to human leukemia (HL-60) cells from pluronic P-105 micelles with and without the application of ultrasound. The comet assay was used to quantify the amount of DNA damage. No significant DNA damage was observed when the cells were treated with 0.1, 1 and 10 wt% P-105 with or without ultrasound (70 kHz, 1.3 W/cm(2)) for 1 h or for up to 3 h in 10 wt% P-105. However, when cells were incubated with 10 microg/ml free DOX for up to 9 h, DNA damage increased with incubation time (P=0.0011). Exposure of cells to the same concentration of DOX in the presence of 10-wt% P-105 showed no significant DNA damage for up to 9 h of incubation. However, when ultrasound was applied, a rapid and significant increase in DNA damage was observed (P=0.0001). The application of ultrasound causes the release of DOX from micelles or causes the HL-60 cells to take up the micelle encapsulated DOX. Our experiments indicated that the combination of DOX, ultrasound and pluronic P105 causes the largest DNA damage to HL-60 cells. We believe that this technique can be used for controlled drug delivery.