"Plasma cell gingivitis" encompasses multiple entities: a retrospective series of 37 cases.

BACKGROUND: Plasma cell gingivitis is defined as gingival inflammation comprised of plasma cell infiltrates. This diagnostic criterion is non-specific and underlying mechanisms remain unknown. OBJECTIVES: We performed a multidisciplinary clinico-pathological review of cases previously identified as "gingivitis with plasma cell infiltrates", with assessment of putative contributing factors and critical appraisal of the final diagnosis. MATERIALS & METHODS: Cases previously identified as "gingivitis with plasma cell infiltrates" between 2000 and 2020 were included from archives from the GEMUB group, a French multidisciplinary network of physicians with expertise on oral mucosa. RESULTS: Among the 37 included cases, multidisciplinary clinico-pathological review allowed differential diagnosis in seven cases (oral lichen planus n=4, plasma cell granuloma n=1, plasmacytoma n=1, and mucous membrane pemphigoid n=1). The remaining cases were classified as "reactive plasma cell gingivitis" (induced by drugs, trauma/irritation or periodontal disease) (n=18) or "idiopathic plasma cell gingivitis" when no contributing factors were identified (n=12). Clinico-pathological characteristics did not differ significantly between "reactive" and "idiopathic" cases, preventing us from identifying specific features of "idiopathic" plasma cell gingivitis. CONCLUSION: "Plasma cell gingivitis" is a polymorphous, non-specific entity with various aetiologies, of which the diagnosis requires multidisciplinary anatomo-clinical correlation for exclusion of secondary causes of plasma cell infiltration. Although our study was limited by its retrospective design, most cases of "plasma cell gingivitis" appeared to be associated with an underlying cause. We propose a diagnostic algorithm to properly investigate such cases.

Oral forms of secondary syphilis: An illustration of the pitfalls set by the great imitator.

INTRODUCTION: Syphilis is reemerging in certain populations, such as in men who have sex with men in particular. Oral manifestations are not uncommon and can render diagnosis difficult, particularly if occurring in isolation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recovered clinical data for all patients receiving a diagnosis of secondary syphilis who were referred to the National Reference Center for Syphilis in Paris, France, from January 2000 to July 2019. We selected patients presenting oral symptoms only and analyzed their general characteristics, time to diagnosis, and clinical presentations. RESULTS: Secondary syphilis was diagnosed in 206 patients, 38 of whom (18%) presented oral manifestations, which were isolated in 14 patients (37%). The main oral manifestations were subacute erosive or ulcerative lesions (55%), mucous patches on the tongue (53%), and nodular (10%) and leukokeratotic lesions (5%). Mean time to diagnosis was 4.5 months, but was significantly longer for patients with isolated oral symptoms (8.8 vs 1.8 months; P = .02). CONCLUSION: Oral presentations of secondary syphilis are frequent and challenging for diagnosis, even in patients with epidemiologic risk factors. Clinicians confronted with subacute oral lesions in such patients should bear in mind the possibility of this contagious, curable, and sometimes severe disease.

Molecular detection of Cellulosimicrobium cellulans as the etiological agent of a chronic tongue ulcer in a human immunodeficiency virus-positive patient.

Ulcerations appeared on the tongue of a 48-year-old human immunodeficiency virus-positive man. Histological findings of the biopsy specimen and the fact that the patient had resided in Louisiana led us to suspect "American histoplasmosis". A new ulcer appeared while the patient was being treated with itraconazole, and the gene for 16S rRNA of Cellulosimicrobium cellulans was amplified. The lesions healed during treatment with oral penicillin and azithromycin.