Changes in Medical Charges Following Intensive Multidisciplinary Intervention for Pediatric Gastrostomy Tube Dependence.

OBJECTIVE: Intensive multidisciplinary intervention (IMI) is the most evidence-based approach to treat pediatric feeding disorders. The goal of this exploratory study was to assess changes in health care charges for patients with gastrostomy tube dependence following participation in IMI compared to a waitlist control. METHODS: Medical charges were assessed for 9 families who participated in IMI compared to 6 control families on a multi-year waitlist for IMI. The IMI and control groups were compared on raw charges submitted as well as individual year-over-year changes in medical charges. RESULTS: The IMI group decreased health care charges by 71% on average in the year following IMI compared to the control group increasing charges by 22% over the same period. CONCLUSIONS: IMI also holds potential cost-savings in the year following treatment compared to children who do not receive treatment and adds to previous research focusing on long-term cost effectiveness of IMI.

Unexpected Poor Growth in Pediatric Patients on Food-based Enteral Therapy: Case Series and Suggested Practice Changes.

INTRODUCTION: Enteral feeding pumps at times may deliver different volumes than are prescribed, which can negatively impact growth, nutrition, and well-being. This study sought to assess whether challenges with pump accuracy for patients on food-based formulas contributed to challenges with weight gain. METHODS: Chart review identified complex feeding patients receiving food-based enteral nutrition via feeding pump with unexpected weight loss. Relevant data, such as enteral formula type, and anthropometric information were extracted. RESULTS: Five complex pediatric feeding patients were identified and 2 of these cases were summarized as representative examples, showing weight loss in children following the introduction of enteral food-based formulas because of feeding pump inaccuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Complex pediatric feeding patients may display unexpected and poor weight gain and growth while receiving food-based enteral feeding interventions because of pump errors. It is vital for providers to be aware of these challenges for timely intervention.

Outcomes for Feeding Tube-Dependent Children With Oral Aversion in an Intensive Interdisciplinary Treatment Program.

Purpose Feeding challenges in children are common, at times reaching a severity that requires the placement and long-term use of enteral feedings. A significant barrier to advancing the oral eating of some tube-dependent children is the presence of oral aversion. Although some research exists regarding the treatment of tube-dependent children who are averse to food or the process of eating, specifically, there has yet to be an examination of children who are truly "orally" averse-resisting not just the presentation of food or liquid but also nonnutritive stimuli presented extra- or intra-orally. Method Using a retrospective chart review, the current study aimed to examine the treatment outcomes of 18 feeding tube-dependent children with significant oral aversion (nine boys, nine girls; M age = 46.7 months, SD = 20.0 months, range: 11.4-89.3 months) as compared to 29 tube-dependent, but nonorally averse, clinical controls. Children completed approximately 6-8 weeks of intensive interdisciplinary feeding treatment. Results Analyses revealed significant improvements in all measured treatment outcomes for both patient groups, including children's rates of acceptance and maladaptive mealtime behavior. Significant reductions in tube use were also observed across both groups, with tube utilization decreasing, on average, by 76.2% for orally averse and by 64.3% for nonorally averse children by program discharge. Conclusion Results demonstrate the therapeutic benefits of intensive interdisciplinary intervention for both groups of tube-dependent children, highlighting that orally averse children, believed to be an especially challenging subset of pediatric feeding patients, demonstrate similarly positive treatment responses. Interestingly, in this preliminary examination, orally averse children demonstrated significantly greater reductions in tube utilization following discharge when compared with their nonorally averse clinical peers.