Comparison of the effects of aprotinin and tranexamic acid on blood loss and red blood cell transfusion requirements during the late stages of liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: During liver transplantation (LT), profound activation of the fibrinolytic system can contribute significantly to perioperative bleeding. Prophylactic administration of antifibrinolytic agents has been shown to reduce blood loss and the need for allogeneic transfusion in these conditions. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This prospective randomized trial included 51 cirrhotic patients undergoing LT. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 280 mg of aprotinin (AP) followed by 70 mg per hour or 40 mg per kg tranexamic acid (TA) followed by 40 mg per kg per hour, administered from the end of the anhepatic phase until 2 hours after reperfusion of the graft, and the effects on blood loss and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion requirements were compared. Transfusion policy was standardized in all patients. In addition, the biological effects of the two drugs, as assessed by coagulation and fibrinolytic markers obtained during surgery, were evaluated in a subgroup of patients from each treatment group and compared with an historical control group that did not receive antifibrinolytic drugs. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups in perioperative blood losses (AP, 6200 [4620-8735] mL; TA, 5945 [4495-8527] mL; median [range]) or in RBC transfusions requirements (AP, 9 [6.75-15.25] units; TA, 10 [6.5-13.5] units). Inhibition of fibrinolysis was observed with both drugs compared with the control group. Coagulation appeared to be activated more with AP, however, whereas fibrinolysis was inhibited more by TA. CONCLUSION: Blood losses and RBC transfusion requirements were comparable regardless of the drug administered. TA may be as valuable as AP for controlling fibrinolysis in LT.

Pediatric en bloc dual kidney-pancreas transplantation into an adult recipient: a simplified technique. Benefits of the en bloc kidney-pancreas transplantation technique in pediatric donors.

The lower age limit for pancreas donors is not well defined. Fear of inadequate islet beta-cell mass and of technical complications has hampered the use of pediatric donors. A surgical technique of 'en bloc' kidney-pancreas is described. Both kidneys and pancreas were removed en bloc from a 13-kg, 31-month-old child. During bench preparation, one anastomosis was performed between the portal vein and the inferior vena cava. The proximal end of the aorta was closed. The bloc was transplanted into a 36-year-old type I diabetic patient intraperitoneally in the right iliac fossa. The kidneys functioned immediately. Pancreatic graft function resumed after POD 15 but insulin therapy was maintained until POD 112. Currently, the patient retains excellent kidney and pancreas graft functions. Very young donors can be accepted as pancreas donors for adult recipients, although slow recovery of pancreatic function can be expected. Use of the en bloc technique is well suited for very small children, as it prevents potential vascular complications.