ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) and recombinant Factor VIIa (rFVIIa) have been used for emergent reversal of warfarin anticoagulation. Few clinical studies have compared these agents in warfarin reversal. We compared warfarin reversal in patients who received either 3 factor PCC (PCC3) or low-dose rFVIIa (LDrFVIIa) for reversal of warfarin anticoagulation. METHODS: Data were collected from medical charts of patients who received at least one dose of PCC3 (20 units/kg) or LDrFVIIa (1000 or 1200 mcg) for emergent warfarin reversal from August 2007 to October 2011. The primary end-points were achievement of an INR 1.5 or less for efficacy and thromboembolic events for safety. RESULTS: Seventy-four PCC3 and 32 LDrFVIIa patients were analyzed. Baseline demographics, reason for warfarin reversal, and initial INR were equivalent. There was no difference in the use of vitamin K or fresh frozen plasma. More LDrFVIIa patients achieved an INR of 1.5 or less (71.9% vs. 33.8%, p =0.001). The follow-up INR was lower after LDrFVIIa (1.25 vs. 1.75, p < 0.05) and the percent change in INR was larger after LDrFVIIa (54.1% vs. 38.8%, p = 0.002). There was no difference in the number of thromboembolic events (2 LDrFVIIa vs. 5 PCC3, p = 1.00), mortality, length of hospital stay, or cost. CONCLUSIONS: Based on achieving a goal INR of 1.5 or less, LDrFVIIa was more likely than PCC3 to reverse warfarin anticoagulation. Thromboembolic events were equivalent in patients receiving PCC3 and LDrFVIIa.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) is recommended as a therapy to be considered for the reversal of warfarin's effects. Few published data are available on the use of PCC for this indication in traumatically injured patients. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the addition of PCC to standard approaches to warfarin reversal more rapidly corrects the international normalized ratio (INR) in injured patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed in trauma patients who were on warfarin preinjury from January 2007 to September 2009 at North Memorial Medical Center. Data were collected from medical records and the trauma registry. Patients were separated based on whether or not they received PCC. The groups were compared on the basis of demographics, units of fresh frozen plasma (FFP), vitamin K use, units of PCC, number of patients achieving an INR of 1.5 or less, time to an INR of 1.5 or less, mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital length of stay, and the incidence of thromboembolic events during hospitalization. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were included in the analysis; 13 patients who received a total mean (SD) dose of 2281 (1053) units (25.6 [12.2] units/kg) of PCC (Profilnine SD) were compared to 18 patients who did not receive PCC. There was no significant difference between groups in FFP units received or the number of patients who received vitamin K. Most patients in both groups achieved an INR of 1.5 or less (92% PCC vs 89% no PCC). However, the mean time to achieve an INR of 1.5 or less was 16:59 (20:53) hours in the PCC group versus 30:03 (23:10) hours in the no PCC group (p = 0.048). There were 3 deaths in the PCC group and no deaths in the no PCC group (p = 0.06). ICU and hospital length of stay and number of thromboembolic events did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: PCC, when added to FFP and vitamin K, resulted in a more rapid time to reversal of the INR.
