Abortion Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions of Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents at Four Midwestern Residency Programs Prior to Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health.

INTRODUCTION: In June 2022, the United States Supreme Court announced its decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization to overturn Roe v Wade. As a result, half of US states now face proposed or in-effect abortion bans, which affect the ability of obstetrics and gynecology (ObGyn) residency programs to provide abortion training. We sought to establish ObGyn residents' pre-Dobbs attitudes toward abortion, desire to learn about abortion, and intentions about providing abortion care in their future practice. METHODS: From January through December 2021, we surveyed 70 ObGyn residents at 4 programs in Wisconsin and Minnesota to assess their attitudes toward abortion, desire to learn about abortion, and intentions about providing abortion care in their future practice. RESULTS: Fifty-five out of 70 (79%) ObGyn residents completed the survey. Most reported highly favorable attitudes toward abortion, nearly all found the issue of abortion important, and the majority planned to incorporate abortion care into their future work. There were no differences in median attitude scores or behavioral intentions among institutions. CONCLUSIONS: Prior to the Dobbs decision, ObGyn residents in Minnesota and Wisconsin viewed abortion as important health care and intended to provide this care after graduation.

"It's important to foster open discussion about the topic": development, implementation, and evaluation of an ethics of abortion independent learning module for second year medical students.

PURPOSE: Despite the frequency of abortions, one-third of medical schools in the US and Canada did not include coverage of that topic, according to a survey conducted in 2002-2005. The purpose of this project was to develop, implement, and evaluate a module for second year medical students related to the ethics of abortion. METHODS: The module was designed as Independent Learning Time (ILT). The stated purpose was for students to consider some of the recent debate in the ethics literature related to conscientious objection and abortion and how personal views may influence future practice. The ILT included readings and Power Points to view. Students were asked to write a one-page reflection on one of three writing prompts. RESULTS: The most commonly selected writing prompt in three classes was on personal values in relation to abortion (56.5%), followed by information about nearest provider of reproductive services to rural preceptor site (34.7%), followed by conscientious objection (23.3%). We received many positive comments about the ILT, including: "First, I would like to acknowledge my gratitude for this assignment and its subject. I believe it is very important that future physicians learn the entirety of women's reproductive health care, including abortion and contraception, but unfortunately this is not always the case in medical training". CONCLUSIONS: There has been an extremely positive response to the ILT. With the exception of the prompt specific to our regional campus mission that includes rural preceptorships during the preclinical years, this module could be implementable at other medical schools.

Necrotizing fasciitis after placement of intraperitoneal catheter.

•Necrotizing fasciitis has not previously been reported in association with placement of intraperitoneal port at time of cytoreductive surgery.•Consensus is lacking regarding the placement of intraperitoneal ports at the time of bowel surgery.•Delayed placement of intraperitoneal ports may be considered in patients undergoing bowel resection.

The effect of selected hospital characteristics on the timeliness of antibiotic administration for pneumonia.

In this study, we compared large urban teaching hospitals (group 1) with small nonurban nonteaching hospitals (group 2) in terms of administering antibiotics to patients admitted with pneumonia within 4 hours of hospital arrival. The following 2 independent data sets were used: hospital-reported data (comprising 22 193 patients with pneumonia discharged from Michigan hospitals in 2003) and hospital surveillance data (comprising 1053 randomly selected patients with pneumonia in Michigan from 2002 to 2004, reviewed by a central data abstraction center). Using hospital-reported data, the mean antibiotic timeliness rates were 65.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 61.5%-70.2%) for group 1 and 79.5% (95% CI, 76.8%-80.2%) for group 2 (P<.001). Using hospital surveillance data, the mean antibiotic timeliness rates were 58.2% (95% CI, 52.9%-63.5%) for group 1 and 70.1% (95% CI, 63.7%-76.6%) for group 2 (P = .01). These results support efforts to reduce logistical barriers to pneumonia antibiotic timeliness at large hospitals.