Prescription opioids are commonly unused after ambulatory head and neck surgeries: Opioids prescription presence and size has no effect on patient satisfaction with pain control.

PURPOSE: To explore the opioid prescribing practices after common ambulatory head and neck surgeries in a large academic institution; and to examine the association between opioid prescription and the patient's satisfaction with pain control. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study conducted in a tertiary academic medical center. Phone interviews of patients who underwent ambulatory head and neck surgeries one month after their procedures were conducted. The interview included, among several questions, the amount of opioid prescribed and consumed, the use of non-opioid pain medications, and the patient's satisfaction with pain control. Logistic regression models were used to investigate the significant factors affecting the patient's satisfaction with pain control. RESULTS: Most patients were prescribed opioids at discharge (84%). Of those, 17% did not use their prescriptions. The median of leftover opioid was 76.50 morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) with IQR (45-130.95). Patient satisfaction with pain control is not associated with opioid prescription at discharge (OR 0.195 [95% CL, 0.036-1.036], p = 0.059) or the amount of the prescribed opioid (OR 1.001 [95% CL, 0.997-1.004], p = 0.717) after controlling for other patient and procedural factors. CONCLUSION: A significant portion of ambulatory head and neck surgery patients were discharged with opioid prescriptions they may not use. Patient satisfaction with pain control is not associated with the presence or the amount of opioid prescribed.

Business Modeling of Orthopaedic Trauma in the Emergency Department: An Untapped Revenue Stream.

INTRODUCTION: Emergency departments (EDs) and emergency medicine and orthopaedic residencies can be faced with financial challenges while caring for patients. Procedures performed by residents are a potentially viable source of revenue that may make orthopaedic coverage of the ED a financially viable service line. METHODS: A custom text-mining program was created and validated, which allowed evaluation of all orthopaedic resident notes. Procedures performed in the ED were quantified, allowing for the calculation of professional fee billing data. The patients with distal radius fractures were followed after fracture reduction through final outpatient clinic follow-up to identify additional professional fee billing. RESULTS: Over a 1-year period, more than $445,000 in uncaptured professional fees charged was identified in the 12 most common Current Procedural Terminology codes for splint application and fracture reduction in the ED. More than $395,000 of outpatient professional revenue was received for patients who had reduction of distal radius fractures in the ED. CONCLUSION: A notable, previously unrecognized and uncaptured source of revenue was identified and quantified. Professional fee billing for distal radius fracture reduction in the ED did not have a negative effect on outpatient professional fee revenue received for these patients.

A System-Wide Approach to Physician Efficiency and Utilization Rates for Non-Operating Room Anesthesia Sites.

There has been little in the development or application of operating room (OR) management metrics to non-operating room anesthesia (NORA) sites. This is in contrast to the well-developed management framework for the OR management. We hypothesized that by adopting the concept of physician efficiency, we could determine the applicability of this clinical productivity benchmark for physicians providing services for NORA cases at a tertiary care center. We conducted a retrospective data analysis of NORA sites at an academic, rural hospital, including both adult and pediatric patients. Using the time stamps from WiseOR® (Palo Alto, CA), we calculated site utilization and physician efficiency for each day. We defined scheduling efficiency (SE) as the number of staffed anesthesiologists divided by the number of staffed sites and stratified the data into three categories (SE < 1, SE = 1, and SE >1). The mean physician efficiency was 0.293 (95% CI, [0.281, 0.305]), and the mean site utilization was 0.328 (95% CI, [0.314, 0.343]). When days were stratified by scheduling efficiency (SE < 1, =1, or >1), we found differences between physician efficiency and site utilization. On days where scheduling efficiency was less than 1, that is, there are more sites than physicians, mean physician efficiency (95% CI, [0.326, 0.402]) was higher than mean site utilization (95% CI, [0.250, 0.296]). We demonstrate that scheduling efficiency vis-à-vis physician efficiency as an OR management metric diverge when anesthesiologists travel between NORA sites. When the opportunity to scale operational efficiencies is limited, increasing scheduling efficiency by incorporating different NORA sites into a "block" allocation on any given day may be the only suitable tactical alternative.